Cited by 176Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceVisual perception and processing mechanismsFree Will and Agency

What is wrong with the no-report paradigm and how to fix it

Open access
Block, Ned·2019·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Is consciousness based in prefrontal circuits involved in cognitive processes like thought, reasoning, and memory or is it based in sensory areas in the back of the neocortex? The no-report paradigm has been crucial to this debate because it aims to separate the neural basis of the cognitive processes underlying post-perceptual decision and report from the neural basis of conscious perception itself. However, the no-report paradigm is problematic because, even in the absence of report, subjects might engage in post-perceptual cognitive processing. Therefore, to isolate the neural basis of consciousness, a no-cognition paradigm is needed. Here, I describe a no-cognition approach to binocular rivalry and outline how this approach can help to resolve debates about the neural basis of consciousness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.001

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroimaging and electrophysiology findings that the contents of conscious perceptual experience can be decoded from PFC activity might be confounded by postperceptual cognitive processes not necessary for consciousness.

    “Neuroimaging and electrophysiology studies have revealed that the contents of conscious perceptual experience can be successfully decoded from PFC activity, but these findings might be confounded by postperceptual cognitive processes, such as thinking, reasoning, and decision-making, that are not necessary for consciousness.”

    From Does the Prefrontal Cortex Play an Essential Role in Consciousness? Insights from Intracranial Electrical Stimulation of the Human Brain (2021) · cites this paper as Block, 2019

    In “No-Report Paradigm in Binocular Rivalry” (page unavailable), Block reports electrophysiological decoding of perceptual contents from prefrontal activity. In “The Need for a No-Post-Perceptual Cognition Paradigm” (page unavailable), he argues that such activity might instead reflect post-perceptual thinking. The claim goes further in saying that neuroimaging studies successfully decoded perceptual contents from PFC: the paper describes fMRI findings chiefly as frontal correlates of perceptual transitions, and reports no detectable frontal difference for one set of stimuli. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • According to some authors, the contrast between seen and unseen conditions includes neural processes that correlate with but are not part of the underlying neural mechanism of consciousness because they include report-related neural activity.

    “According to some authors, the result of the contrast between seen and unseen conditions includes neural processes that correlate with but are not part of the underlying neural mechanism of consciousness because they include—for example—report-related neural activity (for discussion on this issue, see Tsuchiya et al. 2015b; Block 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Block, N.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Block, Ned
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
1003-1013
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982586787
Cited by
176
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
no-report paradigm, neural basis of consciousness, conscious perception, binocular rivalry, prefrontal cortex, sensory cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Consciousness, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Neurosciences, Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review