Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 755

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Slowly digestible starch – its structure and health implications: a review

Lehmann, U., Robin, F.·2007·Trends in Food Science & Technology
DOI 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.02.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2007.02.009

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Anderson, 2002, Digestibility and pasting properties of rice starch heat-moisture treated at the melting temperature (Tm), Starch/Stärke, 54, 401, 10.1002/1521-379X(200209)54:9<401::AID-STAR401>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  2. Axelsen, 1999, Breakfast glycaemic response in patients with type 2 diabetes: effects of bedtime dietary carbohydrates, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53, 706, 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600837 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bauer, 2003, Estimates of starch digestion in the rat small intestine differ from those obtained using in vitro time-sensitive starch fractionation assays, Journal of Nutrition, 133, 2256, 10.1093/jn/133.7.2256 · DOI
  4. Behall, 1988, Effect of starch structure on glucose and insulin responses in adults, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 47, 428, 10.1093/ajcn/47.3.428 · DOI
  5. Benmoussa, 2004, Distinctive sorghum starch granule morphologies appear to improve raw starch digestibility, Starch/Stärke, 58, 92, 10.1002/star.200400344 · DOI
  6. Benton, 2003, Carbohydrate, memory, and mood, Nutrition Reviews, 11, S61, 10.1301/nr.2003.may.S61-S67 · DOI
  7. Benton, 2003, The delivery rate of dietary carbohydrates affects cognitive performance in both rats and humans, Psychopharmacology, 166, 86, 10.1007/s00213-002-1334-5 · DOI
  8. Berti, 2004, In vitro starch digestibility and in vivo glucose response of gluten-free foods and their gluten counterparts, European Journal of Nutrition, 43, 198, 10.1007/s00394-004-0459-1 · DOI
  9. Bravo, 1998, Nutritional evaluation of carbohydrates in the Spanish diet: non-starch polysaccharides and in vitro starch digestibility of breads and breakfast products, Food Research International, 31, 129, 10.1016/S0963-9969(98)00072-6 · DOI
  10. Buléon, 1998, Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 23, 85, 10.1016/S0141-8130(98)00040-3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Campfield, 2003, Blood glucose dynamics and control of meal initiation: a pattern detection and recognition theory, Physiological Reviews, 83, 25, 10.1152/physrev.00019.2002 · DOI
  12. Cecil, 1999, Comparison of the effects of a high-fat and high-carbohydrate soup delivered orally and intragastrically on gastric emptying, appetite, and eating behavior, Physiology and Behavior, 67, 299, 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00069-4 · DOI
  13. Champ, 2004, Physiological aspects of resistant starch and in vivo measurements, Journal of AOAC International, 87, 749, 10.1093/jaoac/87.3.749 · DOI
  14. Colonna, 1990, Enzymic susceptibility of starch from pasta, Journal of Cereal Science, 11, 59, 10.1016/S0733-5210(09)80181-1 · DOI
  15. Colonna, 1992, Limiting factors of starch hydrolysis, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, S17
  16. Ells, 2005, Postprandial glycaemic, lipaemic and haemostatic responses to ingestion of rapidly and slowly digested starches in healthy young women, British Journal of Nutrition, 94, 948, 10.1079/BJN20051554 · DOI
  17. Englyst, 1992, Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, S33
  18. Faisant, 1995, Digestion of raw banana starch in the small intestine of healthy humans: structural features of resistant starch, British Journal of Nutrition, 73, 111, 10.1079/BJN19950013 · DOI
  19. Fannon, 1992, Surface pores of starch granules, Cereal Chemistry, 69, 284
  20. Fardet, 1998, Involvement of the protein network in the in vitro degradation of starch from spaghetti and lasagne: a microscopic and enzymic study, Journal of Cereal Science, 27, 133, 10.1006/jcrs.1997.0157 · DOI
  21. Franco, 1992, Factors that affect the enzymatic degradation of natural starch granules: effect of the size of the granules, Starch/Stärke, 44, 422, 10.1002/star.19920441106 · DOI
  22. Gallant, 1997, Microscopy of starch: evidence of a new level of granule organisation, Carbohydrate Polymers, 32, 177, 10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00008-8 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Gallant, 1992, Physical characteristics of starch granules and susceptibility to enzymatic degradation, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, S3
  24. Galliard, 1987, Starch: properties and potential, Vol. 13
  25. Gannon, 1988, The insulin and glucose responses to meals of glucose plus various proteins in type II diabetic subjects, Metabolism, 37, 1081, 10.1016/0026-0495(88)90072-8 · DOI
  26. Golay, 1992, The effect of muesli or cornflakes at breakfast on carbohydrate metabolism in type 2 diabetic patients, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 15, 135, 10.1016/0168-8227(92)90017-L · DOI
  27. Gunaratne, 2002, Effect of heat-moisture treatment on the structure and physicochemical properties of tuber and root starches, Carbohydrate Polymers, 49, 425, 10.1016/S0144-8617(01)00354-X · DOI · Paper page
  28. Guraya, 2001, Effect of cooling and freezing on the digestibility of debranched rice starch and physical properties of the resulting material, Starch/Stärke, 53, 64, 10.1002/1521-379X(200102)53:2<64::AID-STAR64>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  29. Guraya, 2001, Effect of enzyme concentration and storage temperature on the formation of slowly digestible starch from cooked debranched rice starch, Starch/Stärke, 53, 131, 10.1002/1521-379X(200104)53:3/4<131::AID-STAR131>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  30. Harbis, 2004, Glycemic and insulinemic meal responses modulate postprandial hepatic and intestinal lipoprotein accumulation in obese, insulin resistant subjects, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 80, 896, 10.1093/ajcn/80.4.896 · DOI
  31. Holm, 1983, Digestibility of amylose–lipid complexes in vitro and in vivo, Starch/Stärke, 35, 294, 10.1002/star.19830350902 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hoover, 1996, Effect of heat-moisture treatment on the structure and physicochemical properties of legume starches, Food Research International, 29, 731, 10.1016/S0963-9969(97)86873-1 · DOI
  33. Hoover, 1993, Studies on the physiological properties of native, defatted, and heat-moisture treated pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L) starch, Carbohydrate Research, 246, 185, 10.1016/0008-6215(93)84032-2 · DOI
  34. Hoover, 1994, Effect of heat-moisture treatment on the structure and physiochemical properties of cereal, legume, and tuber starches, Carbohydrate Research, 252, 33, 10.1016/0008-6215(94)90004-3 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Hoover, 1994, The effect of annealing on the physicochemical properties of wheat, oat, potato and lentil starches, Journal of Food Biochemistry, 17, 303, 10.1111/j.1745-4514.1993.tb00476.x · DOI
  36. Hoover, 2003, In vitro and in vivo hydrolysis of legume starches by α-amylase and resistant starch formation in legumes – a review, Carbohydrate Polymers, 54, 401, 10.1016/S0144-8617(03)00180-2 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Imberty, 1991, Recent advances in knowledge of starch structure, Starch/Stärke, 43, 375, 10.1002/star.19910431002 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Jacobs, 1998, Impact of annealing on the susceptibility of wheat, potato and pea starches to hydrolysis with pancreatin, Carbohydrate Research, 305, 193, 10.1016/S0008-6215(97)10035-0 · DOI
  39. Jane, 1997, Branch-structure difference in starches of A- and B-type X-ray patterns revealed by their naegeli dextrins, Carbohydrate Research, 300, 219, 10.1016/S0008-6215(97)00056-6 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Juntunen, 2002, Postprandial glucose, insulin, and incretin responses to grain products in healthy subjects, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 75, 254, 10.1093/ajcn/75.2.254 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Korol, 1998, Glucose, memory, and aging, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 67, S764, 10.1093/ajcn/67.4.764S · DOI · Paper page
  42. Leathwood, 1988, Effects of slow release carbohydrates in the form of bean flakes on the evolution of hunger and satiety in man, Appetite, 10, 1, 10.1016/S0195-6663(88)80028-X · DOI
  43. Le François, 1989, In vitro availability of starch in cereal products, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 49, 499, 10.1002/jsfa.2740490413 · DOI
  44. Lehmann, 2002, Characterization of resistant starch type III from banana (Musa acuminata), Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 5236, 10.1021/jf0203390 · DOI
  45. Leloup, 1992, Microstructure of amylose gels, Carbohydrate Polymers, 18, 189, 10.1016/0144-8617(92)90063-V · DOI
  46. Lorenz, 1984, Steeping of barley starch, Starch/Stärke, 36, 116
  47. Ludwig, 2002, The Glycemic Index: Physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2414, 10.1001/jama.287.18.2414 · DOI
  48. Mayer, 1953, Glucostatic mechanism of the regulation of food intake, New England Journal of Medicine, 249, 13, 10.1056/NEJM195307022490104 · DOI · Paper page
  49. McCleary, 2002, Measurement of resistant starch by enzymatic digestion in starch and selected plant materials. Collaborative study, J AOAC International, 85, 1103, 10.1093/jaoac/85.5.1103 · DOI
  50. Niba, 2003, Processing effects on susceptibility of starch to digestion in some dietary starch sources, International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 54, 97, 10.1080/0963748031000042038 · DOI
  51. Normand, 2001, Influence of dietary fat on postprandial glucose metabolism (exogenous and endogenous) using intrinsically 13C-enriched durum wheat, British Journal of Nutrition, 86, 3, 10.1079/BJN2001359 · DOI
  52. Oates, 1997, Towards an understanding of starch granule structure and hydrolysis, Trends in Food Science & Technology, 8, 375, 10.1016/S0924-2244(97)01090-X · DOI · Paper page
  53. de Oliveira-Serrano, 2005, Annealing and enzymatic hydrolysis of cassava starch, Brazilian Journal of Food Technology, 5, 220
  54. Park, 1994, Effects of substrate branching characteristics on kinetics of enzymatic depolymerization of mixed linear and branched polysaccharides: I. Amylose/amylopectin α-amylolysis, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 44, 792, 10.1002/bit.260440704 · DOI
  55. Quattrucci, 1997, Effects of technological processes on starch digestibility in pasta, Italian Food & Beverage Technology, 9, 14
  56. Sajilata, 2006, Resistant starch – a review, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 5, 1, 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2006.tb00076.x · DOI · Paper page
  57. Schweizer, 1988, Definition and measurement of a starch digestion index and a study of factors determining starch digestion rates in foods, Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie, 21, 352
  58. Seal, 2003, Postprandial carbohydrate metabolism in healthy subjects and those with type 2 diabetes fed starches with slow and rapid hydrolysis rates determined in vitro, British Journal of Nutrition, 90, 853, 10.1079/BJN2003972 · DOI
  59. Shin, 2004, Slowly digestible starch from debranched waxy sorghum starch: preparation and properties, Cereal Chemistry, 81, 404, 10.1094/CCHEM.2004.81.3.404 · DOI
  60. Shin, 2005, Effect of hydrothermal treatment on formation and structural characteristics of slowly digestible non-pasted granular sweet potato starch, Starch/Stärke, 57, 421, 10.1002/star.200400377 · DOI
  61. Srichuwong, 2005, Starches from different botanical sources I: Contribution of amylopectin fine structure to thermal properties and enzyme digestibility, Carbohydrate Polymers, 60, 529, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Stute, 1992, Hydrothermal modification of starches: the difference between annealing and heat/moisture-treatment, Starch/Stärke, 44, 205, 10.1002/star.19920440603 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Tester, 2000, Annealing of starch – a review, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 27, 1, 10.1016/S0141-8130(99)00121-X · DOI · Paper page
  64. Tester, 2004, Starch structure and digestibility enzyme–substrate relationship, World's Poultry Science Journal, 60, 186, 10.1079/WPS20040014 · DOI
  65. Tormo, 2004, Hypoglycaemic and anorexigenic activities of an alpha-amylase inhibitor from white kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Wistar rats, British Journal of Nutrition, 92, 785, 10.1079/BJN20041260 · DOI
  66. Vonk, 2000, Digestion of so-called resistant starch sources in the human small intestine, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72, 432, 10.1093/ajcn/72.2.432 · DOI
  67. Wachters-Hagedoorn, 2006, The rate of intestinal glucose absorption is correlated with plasma glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide concentrations in healthy men, Journal of Nutrition, 136, 1511, 10.1093/jn/136.6.1511 · DOI
  68. Weurding, 2001, In vitro starch digestion correlates well with rate and extent of starch digestion in broiler chicken, Journal of Nutrition, 131, 2336, 10.1093/jn/131.9.2336 · DOI
  69. Wolever, 2003, Carbohydrate and the regulation of blood glucose and metabolism, Nutrition Reviews, 61, S40, 10.1301/nr.2003.may.S40-S48 · DOI
  70. Wolf, 1999, Effects of chemical modification on in vitro rate and extent of food starch digestion: an attempt to discover a slowly digested starch, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47, 4178, 10.1021/jf9813900 · DOI
  71. Wu, 1978, The double-helical molecular structure of crystalline A-amylose, Carbohydrate Research, 61, 27, 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)84464-X · DOI
  72. Würsch, 1986, Cell structure and starch nature as key determinants of the digestion rate of starch in legume, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 43, 25, 10.1093/ajcn/43.1.25 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Zhang, G., Ao, Z., & Hamaker, B. R. Slow digestion property of native cereal starches. Biomacromolecules, in press, published on web 10/25/2006. · DOI · Paper page
  74. Zhang, G., Venkatachalam, M., & Hamaker, B. R. Structural basis for the slow digestion property of native cereal starch. Biomacromolecules, in press, published on web 10/25/2006. · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lehmann, U., & Robin, F.
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
346-355
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.tifs.2007.02.009
OpenAlex
W2063358400
Cited by
755
References
5
FWCI
13.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.