Cited by 151Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerSignaling Pathways in DiseaseDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Rethinking WNT signaling

Tolwinski, Nicholas S, Wieschaus, Eric·2004·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

Recent research on the WNT signaling pathway warrants a reassessment of the basic mechanism that transmits signal from the membrane-bound receptor to the nucleus. This article incorporates these findings into a revised model for pathway activation. We propose that the control of Axin stability, rather than the control of ZW3 phosphorylation of the Armadillo protein, is the key step in signaling. Axin degradation is controlled by a stabilizing effect of ZW3-dependent phosphorylation, and a destabilizing effect of active Arrow. Removing Axin enables Armadillo to accumulate and re-localize to the nucleus. We argue that nuclear localization of Armadillo is required for transcriptional pathway activity. Finally, we speculate on the effects this revision will have on the major questions facing the WNT field of research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2004.02.003

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GSK-3β controls cell survival through regulation of β-catenin, and inhibition of Akt suppresses the Wnt pathway by activation of GSK-3β and degradation of β-catenin.

    “At the same time, GSK-3β also controls cell survival through regulation of β-catenin, 1 of the key molecules in Wnt signaling (11), and inhibition of Akt suppresses the Wnt pathway by activation of GSK-3β and degradation of ß-catenin (51).”

    From Anabolic effect of plant brassinosteroid (2011) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tolwinski, N. S., & Wieschaus, E.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wieschaus, Eric
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
177-181
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965204519
Cited by
151
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA041086, P01CA41086)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Signaling Pathways in Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
Wnt signaling, armadillos, arrows, signal transduction, transcriptional activation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Cell Nucleus, Models, Biological, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Signal Transduction, Zebrafish Proteins, Wnt Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review