Cited by 436SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesViral Infections and Outbreaks Research

Memory T cell responses targeting the SARS coronavirus persist up to 11 years post-infection

Open access
Ng, Oi-Wing, Chia, Adeline, Tan, Anthony T., Jadi, Ramesh S., Leong, Hoe Nam, Bertoletti, Antonio, Tan, Yee-Joo·2016·Vaccine

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a highly contagious infectious disease which first emerged in late 2002, caused by a then novel human coronavirus, SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV). The virus is believed to have originated from bats and transmitted to human through intermediate animals such as civet cats. The re-emergence of SARS-CoV remains a valid concern due to the continual persistence of zoonotic SARS-CoVs and SARS-like CoVs (SL-CoVs) in bat reservoirs. In this study, the screening for the presence of SARS-specific T cells in a cohort of three SARS-recovered individuals at 9 and 11 years post-infection was carried out, and all memory T cell responses detected target the SARS-CoV structural proteins. Two CD8(+) T cell responses targeting the SARS-CoV membrane (M) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins were characterized by determining their HLA restriction and minimal T cell epitope regions. Furthermore, these responses were found to persist up to 11 years post-infection. An absence of cross-reactivity of these CD8(+) T cell responses against the newly-emerged Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was also demonstrated. The knowledge of the persistence of SARS-specific celullar immunity targeting the viral structural proteins in SARS-recovered individuals is important in the design and development of SARS vaccines, which are currently unavailable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.02.063

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following natural infection of humans with SARS-CoV, neutralizing antibody and memory B cell responses in some individuals are short lived (~3 years), whereas memory T cells persist for at least 6 years.

    “Following natural infection of humans with the related SARS-CoV, neutralizing antibody and memory B cell responses in some individuals are reported to be short lived (~ 3 years), whereas memory T cells persist for at least 6 years (54–56)”

    From An <i>Alphavirus</i> -derived replicon RNA vaccine induces SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody and T cell responses in mice and nonhuman primates (2020) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Introduction reports that SARS-specific memory T cells persisted for up to six years after recovery, and the Conclusion reports their detection at nine and eleven years. The Introduction also says SARS-specific antibody levels were undetectable at six years, but our copy does not establish that neutralizing antibodies or memory B cells were short-lived at approximately three years. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In humans, T cells contribute to the resolution of SARS-CoV infection and can form a long-lasting memory response to SARS-CoV up to 11 years post-infection in recovered patients.

    “In humans, T cells contribute to the resolution of SARS-CoV infection and can form a long-lasting memory response to SARS-CoV up to 11 years post-infection in recovered patients.27”

    From Safety and immunogenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 ARCoV mRNA vaccine in Chinese adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial (2022) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Conclusion reports SARS-specific memory T cells in three recovered individuals at 9 and 11 years post-infection. The Introduction links lower T-cell numbers in humans with severe disease, but attributes evidence for T-cell-mediated viral clearance to animal studies; it does not establish that T cells contribute to resolution of infection in humans. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, O.-W., Chia, A., Tan, A. T., Jadi, R. S., Leong, H. N., Bertoletti, A., & Tan, Y.-J.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Singapore General Hospital (SG)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Tan, Anthony T.
  • Tan, Yee-Joo
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
34
Issue
17
Pages
2008-2014
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2292472819
Cited by
436
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 136 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
A*STAR BMRC (10/1/21/19/652)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Keywords
SARS coronavirus, memory T cell responses, CD8+ T cells, SARS survivors, membrane proteins, nucleocapsid protein, HLA restriction, T cell epitopes, cross-reactivity, MERS-CoV, zoonotic coronaviruses
MeSH terms
Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins, Coronavirus M Proteins, Cross Reactions, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Immunologic Memory, Viral Matrix Proteins, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte, Nucleocapsid Proteins, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review