Cited by 7Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Do Unified Protocol modules exert general or unique effects on anxiety, depression, and transdiagnostic targets?

Open access
Southward, Matthew W., Lane, Sean P., Shroyer, Sara E., Sauer-Zavala, Shannon·2023·Journal of Mood & Anxiety Disorders

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Several transdiagnostic cognitive-behavior therapies include multiple treatment components. However, it is unclear whether some components are more efficacious than others at reducing symptoms or whether these components uniquely influence their putative mechanism of change. Participants (N = 70; Mage = 33.7; 67.1% female, 74.3% White) with a primary anxiety or depressive disorder were randomized to one of three standard or personalized sequences of core UP modules. Using hierarchical linear modeling, we tested (a) whether the average session-to-session change in anxiety and depression differed between modules and (b) whether the average session-to-session change in the putative mechanism of each module differed between modules. All modules led to similar changes in anxiety, but Confronting Physical Sensations led to significantly less change in depression than other modules. There were no significant differences among modules predicting putative mechanisms of change, although there was a trend for Mindful Emotion Awareness to predict greater improvements in mindfulness than Understanding Emotions. Consistent with its transdiagnostic nature, UP modules may exert similar effects on anxiety and putative mechanisms of change, although interoceptive exposures may be less impactful for changing depressive symptoms and the mindfulness module may promote relatively specific improvements in mindfulness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100022

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These evidence-based psychotherapies include "active elements" such as therapy concepts, emotion regulation skills, and behavior change skills that impart unique therapeutic benefits.

    “These evidence-based psychotherapies include “active elements” such as therapy concepts, emotion regulation skills, and behavior change skills that impart unique therapeutic benefits [4,5].”

    From Clinical Effects of Asynchronous Provider-Guided Practice Sessions During Blended Care Therapy for Anxiety and Depression: Pragmatic Retrospective Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [4]

    The paper describes Unified Protocol modules containing psychoeducation, emotion-awareness, cognitive, and behavior-change skills, and reports some module-specific effects. But its Discussion (page not provided) says it found little evidence that the modules had differential effects overall. The claim overstates the evidence by presenting unique therapeutic benefits as a general feature of these elements. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Southward, M. W., Lane, S. P., Shroyer, S. E., & Sauer-Zavala, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Southward, Matthew W.
Venue
Journal of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
3
Pages
100022
ISSN
2950-0044 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386142847
Cited by
6
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Mood and Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH126211)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Unified Protocol, anxiety disorders, depression, treatment modules, mechanisms of change, interoceptive exposure, emotional understanding, mindfulness, emotional awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review