Cited by 71Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Individual histone deacetylases in Drosophila modulate transcription of distinct genes

Cho, Younsook, Griswold, Anthony, Campbell, Catherine, Min, Kyung-Tai·2005·Genomics

Abstract

Lysine residues on the N-terminal tails of histones in chromatin are the primary targets of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) in eukaryotes. Regulation of histone acetylation by these two classes of enzymes plays significant roles in controlling transcriptional activity in cells. Eukaryotic organisms have several different HDACs, but the biological roles of each HDAC are still not clear. To understand the physiological functions of HDACs, we characterized six different Drosophila HDACs, including Rpd3, HDAC3, HDAC4, HDAC6-S, HDAC6-L, and Sir2, by developmental expression pattern, transcriptional profiles of target genes, and sensitivity to HDAC inhibitors. We found that each HDAC has a distinct temporal expression pattern and regulates transcription of a unique set of genes. Furthermore, we demonstrated differential sensitivity of HDACs to inhibitors. These results show that each individual HDAC plays different roles in regulating genes involved in various biological processes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygeno.2005.07.007

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Invertebrates like Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster conserve the canonical Y and should retain canonical HDAC catalytic activity.

    “Invertebrates like Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster conserve the canonical Y and, accordingly, should retain canonical HDAC catalytic activity as suggested previously (25,26).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, Y., Griswold, A., Campbell, C., & Min, K.-T.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Min, Kyung-Tai
Venue
Genomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
606-617
ISSN
0888-7543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965804460
Cited by
71
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
histone deacetylase, Drosophila, histone acetylation, transcriptional regulation, Rpd3, HDAC3, HDAC4, HDAC6, Sir2, histone deacetylase inhibitors, developmental gene expression, chromatin regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromatin, Drosophila, Enzyme Inhibitors, Gene Expression Regulation, Histone Deacetylases, Histones, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review