Cited by 214Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 126 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Impact of socio-emotional context, brain development, and pubertal maturation on adolescent risk-taking

Open access
Smith, Ashley R., Chein, Jason, Steinberg, Laurence·2013·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

While there is little doubt that risk-taking is generally more prevalent during adolescence than before or after, the underlying causes of this pattern of age differences have long been investigated and debated. One longstanding popular notion is the belief that risky and reckless behavior in adolescence is tied to the hormonal changes of puberty. However, the interactions between pubertal maturation and adolescent decision making remain largely understudied. In the current review, we discuss changes in decision making during adolescence, focusing on the asynchronous development of the affective, reward-focused processing system and the deliberative, reasoned processing system. As discussed, differential maturation in the structure and function of brain systems associated with these systems leaves adolescents particularly vulnerable to socio-emotional influences and risk-taking behaviors. We argue that this asynchrony may be partially linked to pubertal influences on development and specifically on the maturation of the affective, reward-focused processing system.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that adolescent risk-taking reflects an imbalance between a rapidly sensitized affective/reward system and a slower-maturing cognitive-control system, with puberty likely influencing mainly reward sensitivity. It calls for more direct research because existing evidence is indirect, inconsistent, and insufficient for firm conclusions.

Key findings

  • The authors propose that puberty has a stronger impact on reward sensitivity and sensation-seeking than on cognitive control and self-regulation; behavioral evidence links sensation-seeking more closely to pubertal maturation than to chronological age, and animal and human hormone studies tie testosterone/estradiol to greater reward seeking.
  • In a cross-sectional analysis of more than 7,500 people aged 12–24, sensation-seeking followed an inverted-U pattern peaking in mid-adolescence, while impulsivity declined linearly across adolescence and into young adulthood.
  • Neuroimaging results are mixed but often suggest adolescent hypersensitivity to reward: one study found mid/late pubertal adolescents showed weaker striatal and stronger prefrontal responses to reward than pre/early pubertal peers, while another found testosterone positively associated with striatal reward activation in 10–16-year-olds. Rodent data indicate striatal dopamine receptor binding peaks in adolescence at 30–45% above adult levels.
  • Context matters: in laboratory tasks, adolescents resemble adults under “cold” conditions but take more risks under “hot” conditions, such as turning over more cards when given immediate feedback and driving more riskily when observed by peers.

Methods

  • Narrative review and speculative synthesis, not an empirical study; it integrates behavioral, neuroimaging, animal, and hormonal literature to sort puberty-dependent from puberty-independent processes in adolescent decision making.
  • No new sample, data collection, or statistical analysis is reported; the authors describe selected studies and advance hypotheses, especially a dual-systems account.

Limitations

  • Stated by the authors: few studies directly examine puberty and decision making; constructs and measures vary widely; puberty is measured inconsistently; age and puberty are confounded; findings support hypotheses rather than firm conclusions; social experiences may influence pubertal timing, complicating causal direction.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not describe a systematic search or formal quality appraisal, and it relies on indirect and sometimes contradictory evidence, including conflicting findings the authors themselves note (e.g., Forbes et al. versus Op de Macks et al.; Warren and Brooks-Gunn versus Steinberg et al.).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.03.006

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 126 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 73 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 10
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 42
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
52 of 52
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Heightened reward sensitivity is implicated in increased sensation-seeking, novelty-seeking, attention to reward, emotional arousal, and attention to social information.

    “Heightened sensitivity to reward is implicated in increased sensation- and novelty-seeking, attention to reward, emotional arousal, and attention to social information.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Post-pubertal levels of sex hormones remain high long after sensation-seeking begins to decline.

    “The fact that post-pubertal levels of sex hormones remain high long after sensation-seeking begins to decline”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Puberty occurs alongside numerous other developmental changes in adolescence.

    “because puberty coincides with many other changes in adolescent functioning”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 132 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 210

Metadata

Authors
Smith, A. R., Chein, J., & Steinberg, L.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Ashley R.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
323-332
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003794799
Cited by
214
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 11
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA020006)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA022546)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
adolescent risk-taking, pubertal development, brain development, decision-making, reward processing, emotional processing, deliberative processes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Brain, Emotions, Humans, Puberty, Risk-Taking, Sexual Maturation, Social Environment, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review