Cited by 127Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatment

State and trait influences on mood regulation in bipolar disorder: blood flow differences with an acute mood challenge

Krüger, Stephanie, Seminowicz, David, Goldapple, Kim, Kennedy, Sidney H, Mayberg, Helen S·2003·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Even in remission, patients with bipolar disorder (BD) remain sensitive to external stressors that can trigger new episodes. Imitating such stressors by the controlled transient exposure to an emotional stimulus may help to identify brain regions modulating this sensitivity.Methods Transient sadness was induced in 9 euthymic and in 11 depressed subjects with BD. Regional blood flow (rCBF) changes were measured using (15)O-water positron emission tomography.Results Common changes in both groups were increased rCBF in anterior insula and cerebellum and decreased rCBF in dorsal-ventral-medial frontal cortex, posterior cingulate, inferior parietal, and temporal cortices. Decreases in dorsal ventral medial frontal cortices occurred in both groups, but subjects in remission showed a greater magnitude of change. Unique to remitted subjects with BD were rCBF increases in dorsal anterior cingulate and in premotor cortex. Lateral prefrontal rCBF decreases were unique to depressed subjects with BD. At baseline, remitted subjects showed a unique increase in dorsal anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex.Conclusions Common rCBF changes in remitted and depressed subjects identifies potential sites of disease vulnerability. Unique cingulate and orbitofrontal changes both at baseline and with induced sadness seen in the absence of prefrontal rCBF decreases may identify regional interactions important to the euthymic state in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00691-7

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krüger, S., Seminowicz, D., Goldapple, K., Kennedy, S. H., & Mayberg, H. S.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Krüger, Stephanie
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-12
Volume
54
Issue
11
Pages
1274-1283
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040533544
Cited by
127
References
70
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
bipolar disorder, mood regulation, regional cerebral blood flow, remission, depression, anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, cerebellum, stress sensitivity, emotional challenges
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Bipolar Disorder, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Male, Oxygen Radioisotopes, Regional Blood Flow, Remission Induction, Tomography, Emission-Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review