The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The actor, who intentionally committed abusive actions (Jones & Davis, 1965; Malle et al., 2014) and had the ability to control them (Weiner, 1979), was blamed by an observer.”
From Blame or Justification: A Conceptual Model of How Attributions Shape Observers’ Deviant Responses to Abusive Supervision (2026) · cites this paper as Jones & Davis, 1965
In the citing paper
“the attribution of responsibility is based on the tendency to view the act as unwanted or morally false.”
From Blame or Justification: A Conceptual Model of How Attributions Shape Observers’ Deviant Responses to Abusive Supervision (2026) · cites this paper as Jones & Davis, 1965
Citations
Cites
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
Social perception and phenomenal causality.
Heider, F. (1944) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0055425 · Cited by 1,346
Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness
Aronson, E., & Linder, D. E. (1965) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(65)90043-0 · Cited by 343
Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception.
Jones, E. E., Davis, K. E., & Gergen, K. J. (1961) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0048514 · Cited by 265
Self-citationSome Determinants and Consequences of the Perception of Social Causality1
THIBAUT, J. W., & RIECKEN, H. W. (1955) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1955.tb01178.x · Cited by 219
Reactions to Evaluations by Others as Influenced by Self-Evaluations
Deutsch, M., & Solomon, L. F. (1959) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2786014 · Cited by 135
Tactics of ingratiation among leaders and subordinates in a status hierarchy.
JONES, E. E., Gergen, K. J., & Jones, R. G. (1963) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093832 · Cited by 113
Self-citationChanges in Social Perception as a Function of the Personal Relevance of Behavior
JONES, E. E., & deCharms, R. (1957) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2786115 · Cited by 84
Self-citationSome conditions affecting the use of ingratiation to influence performance evaluation.
JONES, E. E., Gergen, K. J., Gumpert, P., & Thibaut, J. W. (1965) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0022076 · Cited by 71
Self-citationMental illness, predictability, and affective consequences as stimulus factors in person perception.
Gergen, K. J., & JONES, E. E. (1963) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040797 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Davis, K. E. (1962). Impressions of others and interaction context as determinants of social interaction and perception in two-person discussion groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke Univer.
- Gergen, K. J. (1962). Interaction goals and personalistic feedback as factors affecting the presentation of the self. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke Univer.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,009 of 1,009
Intellectual humility in conversation: Distinct behavioral indicators of self and peer ratings
Meagher, B. R., Leman, J. C., Heidenga, C. A., Ringquist, M. R., & Rowatt, W. C. (2021) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2020.1738536 · Cited by 42
Attribution Theory: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Information Systems Success
Snead, K. C., Magal, S. R., Christensen, L. F., & Ndede-Amadi, A. A. (2015) · Systemic Practice and Action Research · doi:10.1007/s11213-014-9328-x · Cited by 42
The Motivational Underpinnings of Belief in God
Laurin, K., & Kay, A. C. (2017) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.02.004 · Cited by 38
Empathy and biased assimilation of testimonies in cases of alleged rape.
Wiener, R. L., Wiener, A. T. F., & Grisso, T. (1989) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01056407 · Cited by 35
Do Consumers Understand What Different Green Claims Actually Mean? An Experimental Approach in Italy
Iovino, R., Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2024) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2023.2175279 · Cited by 30
Emotional Schema Therapy: A Bridge Over Troubled Waters
Leahy, R. L. (2011) · Acceptance and Mindfulness in Cognitive Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1002/9781118001851.ch5 · Cited by 26
Belief–desire reasoning in the explanation of behavior: Do actions speak louder than words?
Wertz, A. E., & German, T. C. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.08.002 · Cited by 24
Ağaoğlu, M., & Erdil, O. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16071191
THE CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE LINK
WADDOCK, S. A., & GRAVES, S. B. (1997) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199704)18:4
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Venue
- Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1965
- Pages
- 219-266
- ISSN
- 0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066057850
- Semantic Scholar
- 9c794c43a3e196e94e05659f792c1b22fe8ea0a5
- Cited by
- 3,424
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 88
- FWCI
- 48.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- person perception, attribution theory, intention attribution, in-role behavior, distinctiveness, personal involvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review