Cited by 114Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

From effect size into number needed to treat

Furukawa, Toshi A·1999·The Lancet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)01163-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reduction in young women in the Malawi program was partially explained by increased social support.

    “The reduction in young women was partially explained by increased social support, reiterating the importance of giving attention to peer support strategies and evidence of the synergistic impact of diverse sectors, through increased school attendance.”
  • In Malawi's scaled-up Social Cash Transfer Program, depressive symptomatology in youth was reduced by 15 percentage points.

    “As one example, in Malawi's scaled-up Social Cash Transfer Program , 478 a program aimed at reducing poverty, hunger and improving school attendance, that reached 330,000 impoverished households, depressive symptomatology in youth was reduced by 15 percentage points.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Furukawa, T. A.
Affiliations
Nagoya City University (JP)
Corresponding author
Furukawa, Toshi A
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-05
Volume
353
Issue
9165
Pages
1680
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W3021516239
Cited by
114
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
number needed to treat, effect size, treatment effectiveness, clinical trial reporting, meta-analysis reporting
MeSH terms
Research Design, Statistics as Topic, Meta-Analysis as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review