Cited by 164Birth, Development, and HealthPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compensatory placental growth after restricted maternal nutrition in early pregnancy

Open access
Lunney, L.H.·1998·Placenta

Abstract

This study examined the effects of undernutrition in pregnancy on fetal and placental growth among infants born in 1944-1946 in The Netherlands, including infants born during the war-induced Dutch famine of 1944-1945. There was an increase in placental weight, but not in birthweight, in infants whose mothers' nutrition was compromised around conception or in the first trimester of pregnancy. Therefore, the placental index was also increased. Compared to pre-famine controls, the relative increase after first trimester exposure to undernutrition was larger in the northern part of the country (5.2 per cent, 95 per cent confidence interval 1.4, 9.0) where nutritional deprivation was presumably moderate compared to the west (3.5 per cent, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.2, 7.2) where nutritional deprivation was severe. The increase in placental weight is interpreted as compensatory for the reduction in maternal caloric intake. Whereas this suggests that pregnancy undernutrition can stimulate compensatory placental growth, the latter was only seen after first trimester undernutrition, which does not affect infant size at birth. For these infants, therefore, birthweight is not an appropriate proxy measure of undernutrition in pregnancy. These factors need to be considered in future studies relating pregnancy nutrition to adult health outcomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0143-4004(98)90105-9

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sindram, 1953, De invloed van ondervoeding op de groei van de vrucht, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Verloskunde en Gynaecology, 53, 30

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lunney, L. H.
Affiliations
Institute for Cancer Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Lunney, L.H.
Venue
Placenta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
105-111
ISSN
0143-4004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024706817
Cited by
164
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 16
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Placenta (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd026492-02)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1RO1-HD26492-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
placental development, maternal undernutrition, early pregnancy, Dutch famine, fetal growth, birth weight, fetal programming, adult health outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Weight, Female, Humans, Netherlands, Nutrition Disorders, Organ Size, Placentation, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Starvation, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review