CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 200Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and Cortisol

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship of anhedonia and anxiety to social rank, defeat and entrapment

Gilbert, P, Allan, S, Brough, S, Melley, S, Miles, J.N.V·2002·Journal of Affective Disorders
DOI 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00392-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is good evidence to suggest that depression is highly correlated with perceptions of low rank and subordinate status (i.e. feeling inferior, low-self esteem, feeling that others look down on the self, and submissive behaviour). However, it is possible for people to feel inferior and anxious, and behave submissively but not necessarily be depressed. More recently two other processes, defeat and entrapment, have attracted attention as possible processes linked specifically to depression and anhedonia. This research explored the relationship of these variables (social rank variables and defeat and entrapment) to two measures of hedonic tone (low positive affectivity and anhedonia) and anxiety in both a clinical and student population. All variables were strongly associated with lowered hedonic tone and anxiety. However, partial correlations, and a structural equation model fitted to the data from combined groups, suggests that perceptions of defeat play a specifically important role in anhedonia as measured by low positive affect. Framed within an evolutionary model the data suggest that the mechanisms which evolved to help animals accommodate and respond to defeats may have important regulatory effects over positive affect, reducing exploration of and engagement with the environment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00392-5

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Allan, 1994, An exploration of shame measures: II: Psychometric properties and relationship to psychopathology, Personal. Individ. Differences, 19, 293, 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00086-L · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 200

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gilbert, P., Allan, S., Brough, S., Melley, S., & Miles, J. N. V.
Corresponding author
Gilbert, P
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
71
Issue
1-3
Pages
141-151
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00392-5
OpenAlex
W1970053035
Cited by
200
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
anhedonia, anxiety, social rank, social defeat, entrapment, positive affect, hedonic tone, depression, evolutionary psychology, social status
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Depression, Biological Evolution, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Social Dominance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review