Cited by 910Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesGambling Behavior and TreatmentsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Gender differences in substance use disorders

Brady, Kathleen T., Randall, Carrie L.·1999·Psychiatric Clinics of North America

Abstract

Despite the fact that the rate of substance abuse and dependence is higher among men than it is among women, the prevalence rates, especially the more recent ones, indicate that a diagnosis of substance abuse is not gender specific. From the emerging literature on gender differences over the past 25 years, male and female substance abusers are clearly not the same. Women typically begin using substances later than do men, are strongly influenced by spouses or boyfriends to use, report different reasons for maintaining the use of the substances, and enter treatment earlier in the course of their illnesses than do men. Importantly, women also have a significantly higher prevalence of comorbid psychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety, than do men, and these disorders typically predate the onset of substance-abuse problems. For women, substances such as alcohol may be used to self-medicate mood disturbances, whereas for men, this may not be true. Although these comorbid disorders might complicate treatment for women, women are, in fact, responsive to treatment and do as well as men in follow-up. Gender differences and similarities have significant treatment implications. This is especially true for the telescoping phenomenon, in which the window for intervention between progressive landmarks is shorter for women than for men. This is also true for the gender differences in physical and sexual abuse, as well as other psychiatric comorbidity that is evident in female s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0193-953x(05)70074-5

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women who become addicted to opioids progress from initial use to dependence at a faster rate than men.

    “For opioids, clinical reports indicate that women who become addicted to opioids progress through the stages of addiction, from initial use to dependence, at a faster rate than men (Brady and Randall, 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brady, K. T., & Randall, C. L.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
241-252
ISSN
0193-953X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148152055
Cited by
910
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 43
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
gender differences, substance use disorders, women, alcohol consumption, self-medication, psychiatric comorbidity, depression, anxiety, barriers to treatment, family therapy, couple therapy, physical and sexual abuse, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Sex Characteristics, Social Adjustment, Socioeconomic Factors, Comorbidity, Women's Health, Sex Distribution, Disease Progression, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review