Cited by 661Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesEmployment and Welfare Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social inequalities in health: Next questions and converging evidence

Abstract

Mortality studies show that social inequalities in health include, but are not confined to, worse health among the poor. There is a social gradient: mortality rises with decreasing socio-economic status. Three large sample studies, one British and two American, brought together for their complementarity in samples, measures, and design, all show similar social gradients for adult men and women in physical and mental morbidity and in psychological well-being. These gradients are observed both with educational and occupational status and are not explained by parents' social status or lack of an intact family during childhood. They are also not accounted for by intelligence measured in school. This suggests that indirect selection cannot account for inequalities in health. Possible mediators that link social position to physical and mental health include smoking and features of psycho-social environment at work and outside.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00194-3

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stevenson, 1928, The vital statistics of wealth and poverty (report of a paper to Royal Statistical Society), Britsh Medical Journal, 1, 354
  2. Marks, 1996, Socioeconomic status, gender, and health at midlife: evidence from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study, Vol. 13A, 135

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Marmot, M., Ryff, C. D., Bumpass, L. L., Shipley, M., & Marks, N. F.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Wisconsin System (US)
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-03
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
901-910
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966184844
Cited by
661
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 27
FWCI
23.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (5RO1 HS06516)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG9775, R01AG009775)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (2 RO1 HL36310-04, R01HL036310)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
health disparities, social gradient, mortality, socioeconomic status, educational attainment, occupational status, psychiatric morbidity, physical morbidity, psychological well-being, indirect selection, parental social status, family structure, intelligence, smoking, work environment, psychosocial environment
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, United Kingdom, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mortality, Social Class, Social Justice, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Causality, Odds Ratio, Occupational Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review