Cited by 127Memory and Neural MechanismsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

MRI volume of the amygdala: a reliable method allowing separation from the hippocampal formation

Open access
Convit, Antonio, McHugh, Pauline, Wolf, Oliver T, de Leon, Mony J, Bobinski, Maciek, De Santi, Susan, Roche, Alexandra, Tsui, Wai·1999·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

Studies of MRI-derived volume of the amygdala have been mostly performed on coronal sections where its boundaries with the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex are indistinct. To date, all reports of in vivo amygdala volume have consistently overestimated the size of the structure. We have developed a method for the MRI-based in vivo measurement of the amygdala volume which allows a better separation of the amygdala from the adjoining hippocampal formation. In nine normal volunteers we obtained three-dimensional spoiled gradient recalled acquisition, 1.3-mm thick, T1 weighted sagittal MR images and created electronically linked reformatted images in the coronal and axial planes. On the original sagittal and the reformatted axial planes, where it is more readily apparent, we delineated the boundaries between the amygdala and the hippocampus and the amygdala and the hippocampo-amygdala transition area, respectively. We then projected those markings onto the coronal plane, where the other boundaries of the amygdala are more easily seen. Using these markings as a guide and utilizing extra-amygdalar coronal landmarks for the anterior end, we outlined the whole amygdala on the coronal plane and determined its volume. We observed that 45% of the coronal slices that contained amygdala also contained some hippocampus. The amygdala measurement had high test-retest reliability, with an intra-class correlation coefficient (rICC) of 0.99 for the total volume and an rICC of 0.93 for the measurement at the level of the individual slice. The average amygdala volume was 1.05 +/- 0.17 cm3 on the right and 1.14 +/- 0.15 cm3 on the left. Our amygdala volumes are in agreement with those reported in postmortem studies, which provides the reported method with face validity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0925-4927(99)00007-4

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. E.G., Peters, A. Eds. , Cerebral Cortex. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 345᎐456.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Convit, A., McHugh, P., Wolf, O. T., de Leon, M. J., Bobinski, M., De Santi, S., Roche, A., & Tsui, W.
Affiliations
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Convit, Antonio
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-04
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
113-123
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108412665
Cited by
127
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • New York State Office of Mental Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P30 AG 08051, R01AG13616, R01AG012101, P30AG008051, R01-AG-12101, R01AG013616)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
amygdala volume, hippocampal formation, entorhinal cortex, volumetric MRI, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Anatomy, Cross-Sectional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review