Cited by 514Reproductive tract infections researchProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and health

Oral use of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and L. fermentum RC-14 significantly alters vaginal flora: randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 64 healthy women

Open access
Reid, Gregor, Charbonneau, Duane, Erb, Julie, Kochanowski, Barbara, Beuerman, Dee, Poehner, Russ, Bruce, Andrew W.·2003·FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology

Abstract

Urogenital infections afflict an estimated one billion people each year. The size of this problem and the increased prevalence of multi-drug resistant pathogens make it imperative that alternative remedies be found. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 64 healthy women given daily oral capsules of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus fermentum RC-14 for 60 days showed no adverse effects. Microscopy analysis showed restoration from asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis microflora to a normal lactobacilli colonized microflora in 37% women during lactobacilli treatment compared to 13% on placebo (P=0.02). Lactobacilli were detected in more women in the lactobacilli-treated group than in the placebo group at 28 day (P=0.08) and 60 day (P=0.05) test points. Culture findings confirmed a significant increase in vaginal lactobacilli at day 28 and 60, a significant depletion in yeast at day 28 and a significant reduction in coliforms at day 28, 60 and 90 for lactobacilli-treated subjects versus controls. The combination of probiotic L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. fermentum RC-14 is not only safe for daily use in healthy women, but it can reduce colonization of the vagina by potential pathogenic bacteria and yeast.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0928-8244(02)00465-0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lm. fermentum is not typically a dominant species in the gastrointestinal tract or vagina, but its established probiotic characteristics make it a promising candidate.

    “WhileLm. fermentumis not typically a dominant species in the gastrointestinal tract or in the vagina, its established probiotic characteristics make it a promising candidate [48, 50–52].”

    From Women's health is a team effort: probiogenomics supports the development of a multi-species vaginal probiotic (2026) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Bacterial strains section (p. not provided) says L. fermentum RC-14 was selected for its ability to colonize the vagina and inhibit urogenital pathogens; the Discussion (p. not provided) describes beneficial effects of the oral probiotic combination. The paper does not establish that L. fermentum is typically non-dominant in either the gastrointestinal tract or the vagina, and its findings concern the RC-14 strain given with L. rhamnosus GR-1 rather than the species generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reid, G., Charbonneau, D., Erb, J., Kochanowski, B., Beuerman, D., Poehner, R., & Bruce, A. W.
Affiliations
  • Lawson Health Research Institute (CA)
  • Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Reid, Gregor
Venue
FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology
Published
2003-03
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
131-134
ISSN
  • 0928-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1574-695X
OpenAlex
W2149188810
Cited by
514
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 32
FWCI
18.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Procter and Gamble
  • Kidney Foundation of Canada
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1, probiotics, vaginal microbiota, bacterial vaginosis, vaginal lactobacilli, coliform bacteria, yeast colonization, urogenital infections, oral probiotic supplementation, healthy women
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Enterobacteriaceae, Female, Fungi, Humans, Lactobacillus, Middle Aged, Vagina, Colony Count, Microbial, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review