Cited by 92Spinal Cord Injury ResearchNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Implanted stimulators for restoration of function in spinal cord injury

Bhadra, N, Kilgore, K.L, Peckham, P.H·2001·Medical Engineering & Physics

Abstract

Neuroprostheses that electrically stimulate paralyzed muscles provide functional enhancements for individuals with spinal cord injury and stroke such as standing and stepping, reaching and grasping, and bladder and bowel function. For chronic applications, implanted neuroprostheses lead to reliable, low-maintenance and patient-acceptable systems. The advantages of such systems are discussed followed by a generic description of implantable stimulators. Features of current first and second generation neuroprostheses developed at our centre are discussed followed by our experience in the application of these devices in the rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1350-4533(01)00012-1

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epimysial electrodes have proven their suitability in current complex motor prostheses that require coordinated stimulation of several muscles, for example, grasping system for tetraplegics (Freehand System) and standing and walking systems for paraplegics.

    “Epimysial electrodes have proven their suitability in current complex motor prostheses that require coordinated stimulation of several muscles, for example, grasping system for tetraplegics (Freehand System) (Bhadra et al., 2001) and standing and walking systems for paraplegics”
  • Forces generated by stimulating two completely independent populations of motor units will add linearly, even if one population is stimulated while neurons from the other population are in their absolute refractory period.

    “Conversely, the forces generated by stimulating two completely independent populations of motor units will add linearly, even if one population is stimulated while neurons from the other population are in their absolute refractory period [14].”
  • Motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation.

    “Another method for quantifying selectivity takes advantage of the concept that motor units in their absolute refractory period, which lasts between 1.5 and 2.1 ms, will not respond to stimulation [1,3,6,11-15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhadra, N., Kilgore, K. L., & Peckham, P. H.
Affiliations
  • MetroHealth Medical Center (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Corresponding author
Bhadra, N
Venue
Medical Engineering & Physics
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
19-28
ISSN
  • 1350-4533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-4030
OpenAlex
W2149989616
Cited by
92
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Engineering & Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000080, 5M01RR 00080)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
spinal cord injury, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, implantable stimulator, stroke rehabilitation, bowel and bladder function, functional restoration, chronic stimulation
MeSH terms
Arm, Biomedical Engineering, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Leg, Prosthesis Design, Spinal Cord Injuries, Prostheses and Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review