Cited by 1,415Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): a phase 2, single-arm trial

Open access
Rizvi, Naiyer A, Mazières, Julien, Planchard, David, Stinchcombe, Thomas E, Dy, Grace K, Antonia, Scott J, Horn, Leora, Lena, Hervé +22 more·2015·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background Patients with squamous non-small-cell lung cancer that is refractory to multiple treatments have poor outcomes. We assessed the activity of nivolumab, a fully human IgG4 PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor antibody, for patients with advanced, refractory, squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.Methods We did this phase 2, single-arm trial at 27 sites (academic, hospital, and private cancer centres) in France, Germany, Italy, and USA. Patients who had received two or more previous treatments received intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg) every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a confirmed objective response as assessed by an independent radiology review committee. We included all treated patients in the analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01721759.Findings Between Nov 16, 2012, and July 22, 2013, we enrolled and treated 117 patients. 17 (14·5%, 95% CI 8·7-22·2) of 117 patients had an objective response as assessed by an independent radiology review committee. Median time to response was 3·3 months (IQR 2·2-4·8), and median duration of response was not reached (95% CI 8·31-not applicable); 13 (77%) of 17 of responses were ongoing at the time of analysis. 30 (26%) of 117 patients had stable disease (median duration 6·0 months, 95% CI 4·7-10·9). 20 (17%) of 117 patients reported grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events, including: fatigue (five [4%] of 117 patients), pneumonitis (four [3%]), and diarrhoea (three [3%]). There were two treatment-associated deaths caused by pneumonia and ischaemic stroke that occurred in patients with multiple comorbidities in the setting of progressive disease.Interpretation Nivolumab has clinically meaningful activity and a manageable safety profile in previously treated patients with advanced, refractory, squamous non-small cell lung cancer. These data support the assessment of nivolumab in randomised, controlled, phase 3 studies of first-line and second-line treatment.Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)70054-9

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nivolumab is a first-in-class fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibody inhibitor that suppresses PD-1 activity by selectively targeting and blocking the interaction between PD-L1 and PD-L2 and the PD-1 receptor.

    “Nivolumab (BMS-936558, ONO-4538, or MDX1106, trade name Opdivo; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA) is a first-in-class fully human immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) monoclonal antibody (mAb) inhibitor that suppresses PD-1 activity through selectively targeting and blocking the interaction between ligands (PD-L1 and PD-L2) and PD-1 receptor [35].”

    From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy (2022) · cites this paper as [35]

  • In CheckMate 017, PD-L1 expression was neither prognostic nor predictive of clinical benefit in a retrospective analysis using various cut points.

    “The expression of PD-L1 was neither prognostic nor predictive of clinical benefit in a retrospective analysis using various cut points in this study.”
  • In CheckMate 017, nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks improved survival by 3.2 months compared with docetaxel in previously treated SCC.

    “A phase III trial (CheckMate 017) in patients previously treated for SCC compared 3 mg/kg of nivolumab given every 2 weeks with docetaxel, showing an improvement of 3.2 months [97,98]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizvi, N. A., Mazières, J., Planchard, D., Stinchcombe, T. E., Dy, G. K., Antonia, S. J., Horn, L., Lena, H., Minenza, E., Mennecier, B., Otterson, G. A., Campos, L. T., Gandara, D. R., Levy, B. P., Nair, S. G., Zalcman, G., Wolf, J., Souquet, P.-J., Baldini, E., Cappuzzo, F., Chouaid, C., Dowlati, A., Sanborn, R., Lopez-Chavez, A., Grohe, C., Huber, R. M., Harbison, C. T., Baudelet, C., Lestini, B. J., & Ramalingam, S. S.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
  • Institut Gustave Roussy (FR)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera S.Maria (IT)
  • Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg (FR)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Mount Sinai Beth Israel (US)
  • Lehigh Valley Hospital (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie (FR)
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
  • Ospedale di Livorno (IT)
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
  • Providence Portland Medical Center (US)
  • German Center for Lung Research (DE)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Rizvi, Naiyer A
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
257-265
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106511606
Cited by
1,415
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 128 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 179 · 2017: 228 · 2016: 229 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
108.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P30CA076292)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
PD-1 inhibitors, lung squamous cell carcinoma, refractory lung cancer, objective response rate, treatment safety, pneumonitis, immune-related adverse events, immune checkpoint blockade, non-relapse mortality, ischemic stroke, pneumonia, fatigue, diarrhea, previously treated patients, duration of response, stable disease, time to response
MeSH terms
Nivolumab, Aged, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Drug Administration Schedule, Europe, Female, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Signal Transduction, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression, Disease-Free Survival, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review