Cited by 725Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Safety, efficacy, and biomarker findings of PBT2 in targeting Aβ as a modifying therapy for Alzheimer's disease: a phase IIa, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Lannfelt, Lars, Blennow, Kaj, Zetterberg, Henrik, Batsman, Stellan, Ames, David, Harrison, John, Masters, Colin L, Targum, Steve +4 more·2008·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background PBT2 is a metal-protein attenuating compound (MPAC) that affects the Cu2(+)-mediated and Zn2(+)-mediated toxic oligomerisation of Abeta seen in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Strong preclinical efficacy data and the completion of early, clinical safety studies have preceded this phase IIa study, the aim of which was to assess the effects of PBT2 on safety, efficacy, and biomarkers of AD.Methods Between December 6, 2006, and September 21, 2007, community-dwelling patients over age 55 years were recruited to this 12-week, double-blind, randomised trial of PBT2. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 50 mg PBT2, 250 mg PBT2, or placebo. Inclusion criteria were early AD (mini-mental state examination [MMSE] score between 20 and 26 points or Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) score between 10 and 25 points), taking a stable dose of acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (donepezil, galantamine, or rivastigmine) for at least 4 months, a modified Hachinski score of 4 points or less, and CT or MRI results that were consistent with AD. The principal outcomes were safety and tolerability. Secondary outcomes were plasma and CSF biomarkers and cognition. Analysis was intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00471211.Findings 78 patients were randomly assigned (29 to placebo, 20 to PBT2 50 mg, and 29 to PBT2 250 mg) and 74 (95%) completed the study. 42 (54%) patients had at least one treatment emergent adverse event (10 [50%] on PBT2 50 mg, 18 [62%] on PBT2 250 mg, and 14 [48%] on placebo). No serious adverse events were reported by patients on PBT2. Patients treated with PBT2 250 mg had a dose-dependent (p=0.023) and significant reduction in CSF Abeta(42) concentration compared with those treated with placebo (difference in least squares mean change from baseline was -56.0 pg/mL, 95% CI -101.5 to -11.0; p=0.006). PBT2 had no effect on plasma biomarkers of AD or serum Zn(2+) and Cu(2+) concentrations. Cognition testing included ADAS-cog, MMSE, and a neuropsychological test battery (NTB). Of these tests, two executive function component tests of the NTB showed significant improvement over placebo in the PBT2 250 mg group: category fluency test (2.8 words, 0.1 to 5.4; p=0.041) and trail making part B (-48.0 s, -83.0 to -13.0; p=0.009).Interpretation The safety profile is favourable for the ongoing development of PBT2. The effect on putative biomarkers for AD in CSF but not in plasma is suggestive of a central effect of the drug on Abeta metabolism. Cognitive efficacy was restricted to two measures of executive function. Future trials that are larger and longer will establish if the effects of PBT2 on biomarkers and cognition that are reported here translate into clinical effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70167-4

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a clinical trial of 78 patients with Alzheimer's disease, patients receiving PBT2 250 mg/day showed a substantial reduction in CSF of Aβ concentration, and some cognitive improvement (executive function) was noted.

    “Patients receiving 250 mg/day showed a substantial reduction in CSF of Aβ concentration, and some cognitive improvement (executive function) was noted.219”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lannfelt, L., Blennow, K., Zetterberg, H., Batsman, S., Ames, D., Harrison, J., Masters, C. L., Targum, S., Bush, A. I., Murdoch, R., Wilson, J., & Ritchie, C. W.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Mental Health Research Institute (AU)
  • Prana Biotechnology (Australia) (AU)
Corresponding author
Ritchie, Craig W
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-09
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
779-786
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128124856
Cited by
725
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 63
FWCI
43.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2009-11-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
PBT2, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, CSF amyloid-beta 42, CSF tau, plasma biomarkers, cognitive function, early Alzheimer's disease, drug safety and tolerability, dose-dependent effects, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, biomarker-guided therapy
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Clioquinol, Ionophores, Male, Metals, Middle Aged, Peptide Fragments, Quinolines, Safety, Biomarkers, Down-Regulation, Placebo Effect, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review