Cited by 35Computational Drug Discovery MethodsSteroid Chemistry and BiochemistryPhytochemical Studies and Bioactivities

Ecdysteroid Structure-Activity Relationships

·2003·Studies in natural products chemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1572-5995(03)80004-2

Cites

198 of 198 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Studies in natural products chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2003
Pages
3-71
ISSN
1572-5995 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1535630692
Cited by
35
References
198
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.48
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Studies in natural products chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Phytochemical Studies and Bioactivities
Keywords
ecdysteroids, structure-activity relationship, insect steroid hormones, phytoecdysteroids, ecdysteroid receptor, receptor cloning, QSAR, molecular modeling, CoMFA, 4D-QSAR, ligand-binding domain, homology model, pest control agents, signal transduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review