Cited by 495Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Stressful life events and maltreatment in conversion (functional neurological) disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies

Open access
Ludwig, Lea, Pasman, Joëlle A, Nicholson, Timothy, Aybek, Selma, David, Anthony S, Tuck, Sharon, Kanaan, Richard A, Roelofs, Karin +2 more·2018·The Lancet Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Stressful life events and maltreatment have traditionally been considered crucial in the development of conversion (functional neurological) disorder, but the evidence underpinning this association is not clear. We aimed to assess the association between stressors and functional neurological disorder.Methods We systematically reviewed controlled studies reporting stressors occurring in childhood or adulthood, such as stressful life events and maltreatment (including sexual, physical abuse, and emotional neglect) and functional neurological disorder. We did a meta-analysis, with assessments of methodology, sources of bias, and sensitivity analyses.Findings 34 case-control studies, with 1405 patients, were eligible. Studies were of moderate-to-low quality. The frequency of childhood and adulthood stressors was increased in cases compared with controls. Odds ratios (OR) were higher for emotional neglect in childhood (49% for cases vs 20% for controls; OR 5·6, 95% CI 2·4-13·1) compared with sexual abuse (24% vs 10%; 3·3, 2·2-4·8) or physical abuse (30% vs 12%; 3·9, 2·2-7·2). An association with stressful life events preceding onset (OR 2·8, 95% CI 1·4-6·0) was stronger in studies with better methods (interviews; 4·3, 1·4-13·2). Heterogeneity was significant between studies (I 2 21·1-90·7%). 13 studies that specifically ascertained that the participants had not had either severe life events or any subtype of maltreatment all found a proportion of patients with functional neurological disorder reporting no stressor.Interpretation Stressful life events and maltreatment are substantially more common in people with functional neurological disorder than in healthy controls and patient controls. Emotional neglect had a higher risk than traditionally emphasised sexual and physical abuse, but many cases report no stressors. This outcome supports changes to diagnostic criteria in DSM-5; stressors, although relevant to the cause in many patients, are not a core diagnostic feature. This result has implications for ICD-11.Funding None.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30051-8

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adverse life experiences are approximately 3-fold more common in FND versus controls.

    “while not all individuals with FND report a history of early-life adversity or antecedent trauma, adverse life experiences are ∼3-fold more common in FND versus controls.196”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. Nicholson TRJ. Studies in conversion disorder-testing the psychological model & Freudian theories. PhD thesis, King's College London, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ludwig, L., Pasman, J. A., Nicholson, T., Aybek, S., David, A. S., Tuck, S., Kanaan, R. A., Roelofs, K., Carson, A., & Stone, J.
Affiliations
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
Corresponding author
Carson, Alan
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
307-320
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790314287
Cited by
495
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 18
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (453-12-001)
  • Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
conversion disorder, life events, child abuse, emotional neglect, sexual abuse, physical abuse, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, ICD-11, psychosomatic disorders, etiology
MeSH terms
Physical Abuse, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Humans, Life Change Events, Nervous System Diseases, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review