Cited by 168Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in impaired decision making in juvenile attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Hauser, Tobias U., Iannaccone, Reto, Ball, Juliane, Mathys, Christoph, Brandeis, Daniel, Walitza, Susanne, Brem, Silvia·2014·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been associated with deficient decision making and learning. Models of ADHD have suggested that these deficits could be caused by impaired reward prediction errors (RPEs). Reward prediction errors are signals that indicate violations of expectations and are known to be encoded by the dopaminergic system. However, the precise learning and decision-making deficits and their neurobiological correlates in ADHD are not well known. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impaired decision-making and learning mechanisms in juvenile ADHD using advanced computational models, as well as the related neural RPE processes using multimodal neuroimaging. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty adolescents with ADHD and 20 healthy adolescents serving as controls (aged 12-16 years) were examined using a probabilistic reversal learning task while simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalogram were recorded. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Learning and decision making were investigated by contrasting a hierarchical Bayesian model with an advanced reinforcement learning model and by comparing the model parameters. The neural correlates of RPEs were studied in functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalogram. RESULTS: Adolescents with ADHD showed more simplistic learning as reflected by the reinforcement learning model (exceedance probability, Px = .92) and had increased exploratory behavior compared with healthy controls (mean [SD] decision steepness parameter β: ADHD, 4.83 [2.97]; controls, 6.04 [2.53]; P = .02). The functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis revealed impaired RPE processing in the medial prefrontal cortex during cue as well as during outcome presentation (P < .05, family-wise error correction). The outcome-related impairment in the medial prefrontal cortex could be attributed to deficient processing at 200 to 400 milliseconds after feedback presentation as reflected by reduced feedback-related negativity (ADHD, 0.61 [3.90] μV; controls, -1.68 [2.52] μV; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The combination of computational modeling of behavior and multimodal neuroimaging revealed that impaired decision making and learning mechanisms in adolescents with ADHD are driven by impaired RPE processing in the medial prefrontal cortex. This novel, combined approach furthers the understanding of the pathomechanisms in ADHD and may advance treatment strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1093

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Hauser et al. study did not separate positive from negative reward prediction errors.

    “but the study did not separate positive from negative reward prediction errors.”
  • Adolescents with ADHD showed reduced reward prediction error processing in the medial prefrontal cortex during a reversal learning paradigm compared with adolescents without ADHD.

    “Indeed, adolescents with ADHD showed reduced reward prediction error processing in the medial prefrontal cortex during a reversal learning paradigm compared with adolescents without ADHD (Hauser et al., 2014)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hauser, T. U., Iannaccone, R., Ball, J., Mathys, C., Brandeis, D., Walitza, S., & Brem, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2014-10-01
Volume
71
Issue
10
Pages
1165
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065928720
Cited by
168
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 2
FWCI
12.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • SDL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, decision-making, reward prediction error, medial prefrontal cortex, reinforcement learning, probabilistic reversal learning, feedback-related negativity, dopaminergic system, computational modeling, adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Child, Decision Making, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Functional Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review