Cited by 277Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Sex differences in event-related risk for major depression

MACIEJEWSKI, P. K., PRIGERSON, H. G., MAZURE, C. M.·2001·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. This study sought to determine if women are more likely than men to experience an episode of major depression in response to stressful life events. Method. Sex differences in event-related risk for depression were examined by means of secondary analyses employing data from the Americans' Changing Lives study. The occurrence and time of occurrence of depression onset and instances of stressful life events within a 12-month period preceding a structured interview were documented in a community-based sample of 1024 men and 1800 women. Survival analytical techniques were used to examine sex differences in risk for depression associated with generic and specific stressful life events. Results. Women were approximately three times more likely than men to experience major depression in response to any stressful life event. Women and men did not differ in risk for depression associated with the death of a spouse or child, events affecting their relationship to a spouse/partner (divorce and marital/love problems) or events corresponding to acute financial or legal difficulties. Women were at elevated risk for depression associated with more distant interpersonal losses (death of a close friend or relative) and other types of events (change of residence, physical attack, or life-threatening illness/injury). Conclusion. Stressful life events overall, with some exceptions among specific event types, pose a greater risk for depression among women compared to men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291701003877

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MACIEJEWSKI, P. K., PRIGERSON, H. G., & MAZURE, C. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2001-05
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
593-604
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2074057702
Cited by
277
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
15.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
major depressive disorder, sex differences, life events, depression onset, women, interpersonal loss, divorce, marital problems, financial hardship, life-threatening illness, Americans' Changing Lives Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review