Cited by 73Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesMental Health via Writing

Default mode dysfunction underpins suicidal activity in mood disorders

Malhi, Gin S., Das, Pritha, Outhred, Tim, Bryant, Richard A., Calhoun, Vince, Mann, J. John·2020·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: Suicide is a serious and not uncommon consequence of mood disorders that occurs primarily when individuals are depressed. Understanding the neurobiology of suicidal activity (thoughts or behaviors) is likely to facilitate prevention. Method: Seventy-nine adult depressed mood disorder patients (MDP), of which 25 had attempted suicide at least once, and 66 healthy controls (HC) participated in this study. Resting-state functional MRI was used to identify neural activity differences between suicide attempters (SA) and non-attempters (NA). Specifically, differences were examined in functional connectivity both within and between four large cognitive networks [Executive Control (ECN), Default Mode (DMN), Salience (SN), and Basal Ganglia (BGN)] and their respective associations with suicidal activity. Results: Compared to HCs, patients had greater posterior DMN activity, but less activity in the BGN, and less low-frequency spectral power in the dorso-medial DMN. Furthermore, increased posterior DMN activity in SA was associated with recent suicidal activity, whereas NA had reduced BGN activity and less dorso-medial DMN spectral power, the latter being associated with lifelong suicidal thinking. SA also had greater activity in midline circuitry compared to both HC and NA, and the pattern of BGN and DMN co-activity differed between SA and NA. Conclusions: DMN engagement raises the possibility that suicidal activity in mood disorder patients may be a consequence of impaired self-referential thought processing. Furthermore, differential BGN and DMN co-activation according to suicide attempt status suggests that attempting suicide perhaps alters cognitive flexibility. These insights are potentially useful for understanding the neural basis of suicide activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291719001132

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies have mostly assessed suicide risk in larger clinical samples of participants diagnosed with mood disorders and other psychiatric conditions with which suicide is a comorbid phenotype, but rarely have they investigated suicide transdiagnostically.

    “Finally, these studies have mostly assessed suicide risk in larger clinical samples of participants diagnosed with mood disorders (64–75) and other psychiatric conditions (76–79) with which suicide is a comorbid phenotype, but rarely have they investigated suicide transdiagnostically.”

    From New methods for assessing rapid changes in suicide risk (2021) · cites this paper as [73]

  • A resting-state study of large-scale brain networks in suicide attempters compared to non-attempters found that increased posterior default mode network connectivity was associated with recent suicidal activity in attempters; attempters also had greater midline circuitry activity and differential basal ganglia and default mode network co-activity.

    “A resting-state study of large-scale brain networks in suicide attempters compared to non-attempters found that increased posterior default mode network connectivity was associated with recent suicidal activity in attempters; attempters also had greater midline circuitry activity and differential basal ganglia and default mode network co-activity (73).”

    From New methods for assessing rapid changes in suicide risk (2021) · cites this paper as [73]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malhi, G. S., Das, P., Outhred, T., Bryant, R. A., Calhoun, V., & Mann, J. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Mind Research Network (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Malhi, Gin S.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2019-05-30
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
1214-1223
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2947576353
Cited by
73
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
suicide, mood disorders, depression, default mode network, basal ganglia, salience network, frontoparietal network, resting-state functional connectivity, self-referential processing, cognitive flexibility, suicide attempters
MeSH terms
Default Mode Network, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Basal Ganglia, Bipolar Disorder, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Rest, Suicide, Attempted, Case-Control Studies, Mood Disorders, Young Adult, Executive Function, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review