The DOI matches its Crossref record; 473 of the 473 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 390 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: a sketch of the evidence.
Open accessAbstract
Human cooperation is highly unusual. We live in large groups composed mostly of non-relatives. Evolutionists have proposed a number of explanations for this pattern, including cultural group selection and extensions of more general processes such as reciprocity, kin selection, and multi-level selection acting on genes. Evolutionary processes are consilient; they affect several different empirical domains, such as patterns of behavior and the proximal drivers of that behavior. In this target article, we sketch the evidence from five domains that bear on the explanatory adequacy of cultural group selection and competing hypotheses to explain human cooperation. Does cultural transmission constitute an inheritance system that can evolve in a Darwinian fashion? Are the norms that underpin institutions among the cultural traits so transmitted? Do we observe sufficient variation at the level of groups of considerable size for group selection to be a plausible process? Do human groups compete, and do success and failure in competition depend upon cultural variation? Do we observe adaptations for cooperation in humans that most plausibly arose by cultural group selection? If the answer to one of these questions is “no,” then we must look to other hypotheses. We present evidence, including quantitative evidence, that the answer to all of the questions is “yes” and argue that we must take the cultural group selection hypothesis seriously. If culturally transmitted systems of rules (institutions) that limit individual deviance organize cooperation in human societies, then it is not clear that any extant alternative to cultural group selection can be a complete explanation.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from a shortened version of the paper’s full text (it is longer than we read).
TL;DR
Richerson et al. argue that cultural group selection (CGS) is an essential and empirically plausible explanation for human cooperation among non-relatives, drawing on evidence from five domains. They conclude that culture acts as an inheritance system, group-level cultural variation is substantial, groups compete, and group-functional adaptations exist, though quantitative estimates of CGS strength remain incomplete.
Key findings
- Culture acts as an inheritance system: developmental evidence shows imitation and teaching emerge in the first 12 months, and historical/linguistic data show phylogenetic descent with modification; in Tupi cultural domains, rates were usually less than five transitions in 10 millennia.
- Cultural F_ST between neighboring groups is consistently greater than 0.01, with some traits above 0.6; for neighboring groups that might compete, cultural F_ST is approximately an order of magnitude larger than genetic F_ST.
- Intergroup competition is documented: among the Turkana, 1% of male mortality is from within-Turkana violence versus 50% from inter-ethnic raids; average raids include 315 men, with some up to 1,000; large-scale warfare can involve mostly unrelated individuals (e.g., Stalingrad involved more than 1.7 million soldiers and over two million casualties).
- Group-functional institutions and religion show effects: costly ritual displays correlate with commune longevity across more than 800 U.S. communes over 200 years; Soltis et al. estimated group extinction rates could spread a group-beneficial cultural trait to most of a metapopulation in 500–1,000 years.
Methods
- The target article is a synthetic review or “sketch” of evidence from five domains: culture as an inheritance system, group-level cultural variation, intergroup competition, group-level functionality, and gene-culture coevolution.
- Quantitative component: cultural F_ST was calculated from survey responses (World Values Survey, AfroBarometer, Public Policy Institute of California surveys, Scottish Health Survey, Anwar Sadat Chair Arab Public Opinion Surveys, among others) for neighboring political, religious, ethnic, geographic, and socioeconomic groups; the Price equation was used to express conditions for group selection.
- Evidence is drawn from developmental psychology, historical linguistics and phylogenetics, ethnography, archaeology, economic organization, religion, and warfare.
Limitations
- The paper states it cannot provide a precise quantitative account of CGS importance relative to competing processes; too few quantitative studies exist, and direct evidence for culture-led gene-culture coevolution is strong only for genes that do not directly affect behavior.
- The paper notes uncertainty about how similar modern foragers are to Pleistocene foragers and that direct evidence for Pleistocene warfare is very limited.
- The text makes evident that cultural F_ST from ethnographic data is often impossible because ethnographers typically report only normative behavior and neglect individual variation; the survey-based F_ST estimates also rely on group classifications that may not capture heritable cultural variation or cooperation-relevant traits.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
328 Not checked yet · 224 Own interpretation · 97 No basis given · 7 Own result · 6 Own method
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consistent with the hypothesis that individual variation for many normative beliefs and behaviors is small within groups and large between groups, we find large betweengroup differences among all groups of all scales (Fig. 1).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our data reach well into the plateau of the L-shaped region of the group selection condition.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The results (Fig. 1A) show that the extent of allomaternal care directed at immatures is the best predictor of experimentally assessed proactive prosociality within a group, far better in fact than any other factor proposed so far, including brain size, social tolerance, cooperative hunting, or the presence of strong social bonds.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Burkart et al. 2014
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“perceive a greater degree of external threat, reflected in the desire for more national defense spending and greater rates of military recruitment, as compared to loose states.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Harrington and Gelfand (2014)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under low threat, the evolutionary pressures resulted in a more diverse mix of all possible strategies.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“evolutionary game theoretical (EGT) models show that groups that face a high degree of threat require stronger norms and greater punishment of deviance in order to survive (Roos et al. 2015).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roos et al. 2015
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and supported more isolationist policies (such as buying American products exclusively and supporting government restriction of imported products) compared to loose states.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Harrington and Gelfand (2014)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“fewer resources (indicated by greater rates of food insecurity)”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Harrington and Gelfand (2014)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“a greater incidence of disease and health vulnerabilities”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Harrington and Gelfand (2014)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Tighter states also had significantly lower residential mobility”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Harrington and Gelfand (2014)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Field research across 33 nations first documented the connection between ecological and historical threat and the degree of norm strength in groups (Gelfand et al. 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gelfand et al. 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and lower openness”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites John et al. 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“we tested this hypothesis across a wide range of variables and found that societies facing ecological and historical threats do indeed develop stronger norms and punishment of deviance (Gelfand et al. 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gelfand et al. 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Individuals in tighter states also had higher levels of conscientiousness”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites John et al. 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Initial results from our broad-scale assessment of these data indicate support for Richerson et al.'s assertion that CGS was active “as far back as symbolic marking is evident.””
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Agustin Fuentes and Marc Kissel
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“these models also found that temporary increases in threat cause norm strength to increase until the threat subsides.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Roach et al. (2013) showed that Homo erectus had already evolved this capacity for accurate overhead throwing.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Roach et al. (2013)
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Among foragers in Indonesia, field studies show that patriclan membership predicts large-scale cooperation in whale hunting better than genealogical kinship (Alvard 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Alvard 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“First, petkeeping occurs in humans only.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herzog 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the fact that long-term affectionate relationships between non-conspecifics have not been observed in the wild, even in nonhuman apes”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A recent study found that mothers who had pets in their childhood, tended to raise their offspring with pets (Westgarth et al. 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Westgarth et al. 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Cross-cultural studies reveal that practices common in modern Western societies, such as letting animals live in our homes, allowing them to sleep in our beds, and considering them full-fledged family members are cultural anomalies (Gray & Young 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gray & Young 2010
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“are unrelated to breed-characteristic qualities such as desirable behavioral traits and frequency of genetic diseases (Ghirlanda et al. 2013)”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ghirlanda et al. 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Europeans were more likely to introduce extractive colonial regimes in relatively richer societies or regions where they could not settle.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Acemoglu et al. 2001
- Not checked yetcites Acemoglu et al. 2002
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The culture of honor within high castes in India is related to a low degree of coordination (Brooks et al. 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brooks et al. 2014
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On the multi-ethnic island of Sri Lanka, 79% of Buddhist households include a dog, compared to Muslim households, of which only 4% do (Knobel 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Knobel 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sudden shifts in the popularity of types of pets occur across cultural groups via social transmission.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“long-lasting changes in the popularity of types of dogs are sometimes instigated by media exposure (films with canine movie stars) (Ghirlanda et al. 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ghirlanda et al. 2014
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“We have found that dog breed preferences are influenced by the decisions of others (Herzog et al. 2004)”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herzog et al. 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A series of empirical field studies I conducted in rural India demonstrate that: (1) individuals do not exhibit a strong tendency to culturally transmit cooperative behaviour (Lamba 2014);”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lamba 2014
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A series of public goods games, played with real money and for high stakes, across these populations found little evidence that people used either pay-off biased learning or conformity to copy others' cooperative behaviour.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lamba 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However the beliefs and values examined are not associated with actual cooperative behaviours; for example, demonstrating that there is significant country-level variation in attitudes toward abortion has arguably little relevance to the argument at stake.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“We found that individuals took more salt for themselves and left less for others in larger villages (Lamba & Mace 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lamba & Mace 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“(2) behavioural variation observed across human groups is at least in part driven by demographic and ecological processes rather than cultural processes (Lamba & Mace 2011;2012;2013);”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lamba & Mace 2011;2012;2013
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Our attempts at testing this hypothesis for the evolution of parochial altruismthe combination of in-group altruism and out-group hostility due to intergroup competition and conflictusing naturalistic field experiments in Northern Ireland, found little evidence to support this idea.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Silva & Mace 2014;2015
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, the historical pattern for the appearance and spread of kinship terminologies as part of the colonization of the Pacific Oceanic Islands, first by Melanesians and then by Polynesians, can be presented as a phylogeny organized around structural differences in the terminologies (Read 2013; see Fig. 1 here).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Read 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Their adaptation included a culturally prescribed system of sealing partners central to procuring and sharing seal meat in the winter months.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Balikci 1970
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found significant differentiation between groups with an average Φ ST of 0.091, indicating that, on average, 9.1% of the variation between individual folktales was between groups”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, incorporating geography into the analysis revealed that at the level of individual folktales, geographic distance explains considerably more variation between folktales than group boundaries (6.6% of variance vs. 3.7%).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“None of the 29 cultural F ST estimates reported by Richerson et al. or the cultural F ST estimates reported by Bell et al. (2009) have been analysed within a spatially explicit framework.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“which is considerably higher than the genetic differentiation found between comparable European populations (Lao et al. 2008;Novembre et al. 2008).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lao et al. 2008
- Not checked yetcites Novembre et al. 2008
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Despite these limitations, we maintain that our cultural F ST estimates provide readily available evidence that between-group variation is sufficient for selection to act at the group level (Rogers 1990).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rogers 1990
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A CGS framework is based on the empirical data strongly suggesting that heritable cultural variation often exists between groups at scales larger than groups linked by kinship or a history of reciprocation (target article, sect.4).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R2. CGS is a framework
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Ethnographic evidence from hunter-gatherer societies suggests that our Late Pleistocene ancestors already had many interactions with non-kin that were regulated by systems of norms and institutions, even in societies numbering only a few hundred to a few thousand (Hill et al. 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hill et al. 2014
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We provide a guide to the relevant theory and argue that the empirical evidence from a range of domains provides robust qualitative support for the point that CGS describes real and important processes in human social evolution.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 1. Introduction
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two of these forms are driven by human choiceschoices in part based on prosocial emotions like Darwin's sympathy and patriotism.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2. The cultural group selection hypothesis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CGS hypothesis is thus vulnerable to disproof in several empirical domains.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 1. Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, evidence from developmental studies shows how a cognitive system for imitation arises in the first 12 months of life and dovetails with adult behaviors that support children's social learning.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3. Culture acts as an inheritance system
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Docile individuals more inclined to conform to norms would find it easier to enter larger more norm-bound groups and hence be able to acquire more sophisticated technology (Simon 1990).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Simon 1990
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“If the payoff to any strategy depends on the local frequency of its use, then even subpopulations in identical environments may reach different stable equilibria over time.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3. Coordination payoffs.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cooper 1999
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The complexity of technology that a group can maintain is a function of its size (Henrich 2004;Shennan 2001).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henrich 2004
- Not checked yetcites Shennan 2001
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, historical evidence shows that human culture exhibits a phylogenetic pattern of descent with modification in which ancestral commonalities can be traced back thousands of years.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3. Culture acts as an inheritance system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“If neutral marker traits correlate with behavioral norms that are difficult to observe, then selection may favor attentiveness to these markers as reliable signals of whom to imitate (McElreath et al. 2003).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McElreath et al. 2003
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Genome-wide scans for genes under selection and comparative studies on chimpanzee-human differences detect strong recent selection at a large number of loci affecting genes that are expressed in the nervous system and in hormone producing glands.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Laland et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Ross & Richerson 2014
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other apes have a much more rudimentary social learning system.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3. Culture acts as an inheritance system
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“This provides a relatively slow form of selection for traits that contribute to group success (Soltis et al. 1995).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Soltis et al. 1995
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As we discuss below, selection on tribes can account for the innate foundation of our social psychology via the process of gene-culture coevolution.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2. The cultural group selection hypothesis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The most ancient human groups are the ethnolinguistic tribes into which simpler societies are generally divided.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The best understood examples of culture-led gene-culture coevolution are adult lactase persistence (Durham 1991) and the hemoglobin polymorphisms that confer resistance to malaria (Allison 1964).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Durham 1991 source
- Not checked yetcites Allison 1964
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Human cognition includes adaptations for imitation and teaching that allow the cumulative evolution of complex traits, including norms and institutions that regulate social behavior (Tomasello 1999).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.1. How human culture facilitates CGS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tomasello 1999
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“While modern nations and the subgroups of which they are composed differ in many ways from ancestral tribes, they rest on the innate foundations that evolved from competition between ethnolinguistic units (Richerson & Boyd 1999).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2. The cultural group selection hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Richerson & Boyd 1999
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Punishment of those who engage in uncommon behaviors can stabilize essentially any norm within a group, regardless of its other adaptive consequences (Boyd & Richerson 1992b).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3. Coordination payoffs.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 1992b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It is also difficult to see how the developmental and historical evidence can be reconciled with an extreme version of the later improvisational intelligence hypothesis of Cosmides and Tooby (2001).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3. Culture acts as an inheritance system
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cosmides and Tooby 2001
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moral norms that evolved under the influence of CGS would exert social selection on human genes via mechanisms such as selective child neglect, mate choice, and punishment (Feldman & Laland 1996;Newson 2013).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Feldman & Laland 1996
- Not checked yetcites Newson 2013
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Humans exhibit a wide variety of culturally transmitted organizational phenomena larger than, and different from, those reflecting biological relatedness and close pairwise partnerships.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2. The cultural group selection hypothesis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two quite distinct lines of evidence show that human culture acts as an inheritance system.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3. Culture acts as an inheritance system
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Over repeated rounds of such coevolution, stretching back perhaps several hundred thousand years, our Pleistocene ancestors came to have institutionalized social systems with (if ethnographic analogs are reliable) complex sets of linked norms organizing tribal societies of a few hundred to a few thousand people (Hill et al. 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hill et al. 2014
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The functioning of complex institutions is highly dependent on tacit knowledge (Aoki 2001).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aoki 2001 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A recent quantitative estimate of rates of cultural evolution using a large body of historical and archaeological data showed that it evolves considerably faster than genes (Perreault 2012).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Perreault 2012
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Children have powerful cognitive systems evolved to acquire quite complex cultural knowledge from their elders.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This favors the spread of group-beneficial norms and institutions (Boyd & Richerson 2002).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The direct effect of environments was strongest on economy-related traits and medium to low on other traits.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Guglielmino et al. (1995)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The effect of horizontal diffusion was high on the division of labor by sex and house type.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Guglielmino et al. (1995)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The same basic system seems to operate across all domains of culture (Harris 2012).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Harris 2012
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the correspondence of linguistic time-depth estimates and archaeological dates, each of these language families appears to constitute a cultural adaptive radiation based upon agricultural subsistence and associated social-organizational features.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Again, this is a necessary but not sufficient condition for CGS to have been an important process.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Such studies show that features of social organization often include strong phylogenetic signals that are correlated with the linguistic signal.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, over-imitation is probably an essential adaptation for building a repertoire of elementary skills and maneuvers that will eventually be incorporated into complex crafts and social institutions (Harris 2012).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Harris 2012
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These innovations allowed their speakers to expand at the expense of hunter-gatherers in the Early and Middle Holocene.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, the effect of either vertical or horizontal transmission was strong on all traits examined.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many cultural adaptations are so complex that the functional significance of many elements of them is opaque to learners and often to accomplished practitioners as well.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The transmission of complex cultural information and its cumulative evolution requires accurate imitation (Tennie et al. 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tennie et al. 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Most grammatical constructions appear to be cultural features underpinned only indirectly by rather general cognitive features (e.g., Hurford 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hurford 2011
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Human children routinely learn concepts with help from knowledgeable others that qualitatively transcend innate intuitions (Carey 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carey 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Thus, studies of child development strongly suggest that human social learning does accurately transmit cultural variants over a wide range of design space in many domains (Carey 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Carey 2009
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Human social learning contrasts sharply with that of chimpanzees and other nonhuman animals.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Adults and knowledgeable children also appear to be adapted to behave in ways that scaffold the learning of naïve children (Csibra & Gergely 2011;Dean et al. 2012;Kline 2015).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Csibra & Gergely 2011
- Not checked yetcites Dean et al. 2012
- Not checked yetcites Kline 2015 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The Walker et al. study is notable for quantitatively estimating rates evolution in several Tupi cultural domains (usually less than five transitions in 10 millennia).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walker et al. 2012
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Carefully following demonstrated recipes preserves functionality, albeit at some cost of replicating non-functional elements.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The phylogenies of several large language families have been investigated, including Bantu (Holden 2002), Austronesian (Gray et al. 2009), Tupi (Walker et al. 2012), and Indo-European (Bouckaert et al. 2012).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holden 2002
- Not checked yetcites Gray et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Walker et al. 2012
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The second-best-fitting model allowed for decreases (but not increases) in complexity to skip intermediate steps.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Currie et al. (2010)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They found that in the best-fitting model, political complexity increased and decreased in incremental steps.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Currie et al. (2010)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“If adults suggest that it is important, children will replicate adult actions in ritualistic detail (Herrmann et al. 2013).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herrmann et al. 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In comparative studies with human children, chimpanzees tended to imitate only the behaviors necessary to reach a goal, while children diligently imitated all of an adult's behaviors whether or not they directly resulted in reaching a tangible goal (Whiten et al. 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Whiten et al. 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Early farmers in Europe were clearly the result of a demic expansion (Haak et al. 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Haak et al. 2010
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social norms are among the cultural traits that children readily acquire from adults and other children.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Traits with some detrimental individual-level effect on reproduction and/or survival can also be favored if group benefits are sufficiently large to satisfy the inequality.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The large cultural differences measured in this analysis suggest a wide scope for CGS.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The effects of out-group discrimination and in-group preference based upon cultural categories like race are evident as early as 3 years of age, when children begin to implicitly associate same-race faces with positive facial expressions and different-race faces with negative facial expressions (Hugenberg & Bodenhausen 2004).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hugenberg & Bodenhausen 2004
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In section 2.1 we reviewed the mechanisms by which cultural systems can preserve much more variation between groups of unrelated or distantly related individuals than can genetic inheritance.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4. Culture exhibits group-level variation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The more groups differ, the more effective CGS is likely to be.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“By the time people are adults, much experimental work by social identity theorists shows that, in many social situations, individuals' behavior is substantially influenced by their affect-laden social group identifications (Haslam 2001).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Haslam 2001
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our average measurements of cultural F ST place the group-benefit-to-cost requirement well within range of some important cultural behaviors.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Bell et al. (2009) compared cultural F ST from the World Values Survey with genetic F ST from Cavalli-Sforza et al.'s (1994) classic study.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bell et al. (2009)
- Not checked yetcites Cavalli-Sforza et al.'s (1994)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social learning biases, such as those described previously, act as a general force adapting culture to local environments.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data suggest that the scope for CGS is substantially higher than for genetic group selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This relationship suggests that evolutionary forces that create relatively small differences between similar groups can provide some scope for group selection in cases where group benefits are high relative to costs.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These values are important, as small increases in cultural F ST beyond 0.01 increase the possibility for CGS dramatically.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that the scope for group selection is sensitive to changes in low values of F ST , because the minimum condition declines geometrically with a linear increase in F ST .”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Even very young children prefer teachers and social partners who belong to their own social group.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The accurate imitation of cultural variation, especially group identities and social norms, is the basis for heritable cultural variation between groups upon which CGS can act.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The Price equation, a general depiction of selection operating on multiple levels, can be re-arranged to express the required conditions for a group-beneficial trait to be favored by selection in the face of individual-level selection against the trait (Bell et al. 2009;Bowles 2006):”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bell et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Bowles 2006
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not all potential providers of social learning are equal.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Young children are strikingly inflexible with social norms and rules, resulting in young moral absolutists (Levy et al. 1995).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Levy et al. 1995
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Chimpanzees' abilities in this regard are more limited (Warneken & Tomasello 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Warneken & Tomasello 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Human children are also motivated to engage with others to pursue a shared goal without any reward, apart from the enjoyment of engaging with another person socially (Tomasello & Carpenter 2007).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tomasello & Carpenter 2007
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Aside from a few cases (e.g., Edgerton 1971), computing cultural F ST from ethnographic data is not possible because most ethnographers studying simple societies report only normative behavior and neglect individual variation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Edgerton 1971
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Attempts to raise chimpanzee infants as if they were children are unsuccessful because young chimpanzees rather quickly mature into independent individuals that are not very responsive to being taught social norms, much less adopting them spontaneously (e.g., Hayes 1951).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hayes 1951
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For neighboring groups that might actually compete, cultural F ST is approximately an order of magnitude larger that genetic F ST .”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bell et al. (2009)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Similarly, ethnographers have documented ample institutional diversity between small-scale societies that are our closest living approximations to Late Pleistocene societies (e.g., Jorgensen 1980).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jorgensen 1980
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Efferson et al. (2008) showed experimentally that symbolic markers and in-group favoritism coevolve.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Efferson et al. (2008)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One important institutional mechanism with substantial empirical support is the marking of group members through differences in dialect, dress, religion, and similar symbols.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Iannaccone 1994
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Even”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4. Culture exhibits group-level variation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew & Boyd 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These studies suggest that institutional variation creates substantial differences in behavior.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Insko et al. (1983) demonstrated the evolution of institutions in a multi-generation experiment designed to mimic the origin of states.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Insko et al. (1983)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The social life of living hunter-gatherers is certainly heavily institutionalized (Hill et al. 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hill et al. 2009
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They found that societies where experiment participants used punishment to promote cooperation also scored higher on these indices than societies in which some experimental participants punished cooperators.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herrmann et al. (2008)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Institutions are hard to try out, because for an institution to be effective, some critical mass of group members has to adopt its rules.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The Ju/'hoansi (!Kung), another primarily familyband society, frequently organize at the camp-and regional-level when drought forces them to aggregate at permanent water holes (Lee 1972).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lee 1972
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Groups from societies that achieved high rates of cooperation over the 10 rounds of the game had high rates of punishment of non-contributors.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herrmann et al. (2008)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The empirical literature on village-scale commons management is particularly well developed and shows that the institutional diversity predicted by theory is amply manifest on the ground (Ostrom 2005).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ostrom 2005
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Institutions from one group are often quite difficult for other groups to copy.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Modern institutions vary substantially cross-culturally (e.g., Nivette 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nivette 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The institutions of another society are often hard to observe because outsiders can seldom see the entire system of rules working together.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some authors argue that institutions only arose in the Holocene (Runciman 2005), although archaeological evidence and ethnographic insights from living foragers suggests that tribal-scale societies were common in the Pleistocene.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Evolution then takes the form of a collective, culturally local search for a replacement institution.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Greif's (2006)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“African evidence suggests that human use of symbolic markers goes back to about 164 k.y.a (Marean 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Marean 2010
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The tendency of cultural items to diffuse between groups is favored by”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rogers & Shoemaker 1971
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Game theory tells us that in repeated games without fixed end points, the number of equilibria multiplies inordinately.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Archaeological data suggest that during the Middle Paleolithic to Upper Paleolithic transition, about 45 k.y.a, coherent cultural groups with stylistically different technology were moving about the Western Eurasian landscape (Tostevin 2013).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tostevin 2013
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If culturally transmitted institutions had a major coevolutionary impact on the innate components of our social psychology (see sect.2.2), then for some part of our evolutionary history humans must have lived in institutionally structured groups of a few hundred to several thousand individuals that were symbolically marked and shared a common identity.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Derex et al. (2014) showed that cultural transmission increases substantially in between-group competition compared to within-group competition treatments.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Derex et al. (2014)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Considerable collective decision-making and learning effort must be expended to integrate a novel institution with the other institutions of the adopting society.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The Turkana frequently raid neighboring ethnic groups for cattle (Mathew & Boyd 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew & Boyd 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, lethal intergroup violence occurs between large human groups within which genetic relatedness is low and individuals do not know each other personally.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CGS could well have been an active process as far back as symbolic marking is evident.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The scale of such raids can be very large despite the absence of hierarchical institutions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew & Boyd 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This evidence suggests that CGS occurs wherever significant cultural variation exists between neighboring and competing groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5. Social groups in competition
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Many societies have such institutions of varying degrees of formality (Nader 1969).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nader 1969
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This pattern strongly supports CGS operating among the Turkana and neighboring groups having similar patterns of ethnolinguistic-scale cattle raiding.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Formal models indicate that genetic group selection can only support warfare in groups of, at most, a few dozen individuals (Choi & Bowles 2007).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Choi & Bowles 2007
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In vignette studies, Turkana raiders had very positive attitudes toward warriors who raided animals from another ethnic group and very negative attitudes toward those who raided another Turkana territory, even though the respondents' own territory would benefit from the spoils in both situations.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew & Boyd 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Losers or potential losers will also often attempt to emulate the technology and institutions of stronger societies.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Archaeological and ethnographic data suggest that warfare occurred in a sufficiently wide range of societies for long enough (Gat 2008) to be a gene-culture coevolutionary force.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gat 2008
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Warfare occurs in societies pre-dating agriculture and sedentary living (Keeley 1997).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Keeley 1997
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The common ethnic identity of Turkana combined with effective norms and institutions are the proximate cultural mechanisms that make large-scale raiding possible.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Humans can make war because we solve collective action problems at large scales.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This means that reciprocity based on warriors' reputations cannot by itself maintain cooperation in the raiding party.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Marriage is a credible signal of commitment, for example, because of institutionalized third-party enforcement.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Almost all cultures have one or a small number of standard, legitimate marriage contracts.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More likely, institutional support is required if people are to enjoy the benefits of highly cooperative interactions even in small social units.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dispute resolution is an example of the institutionalization of small-scale reciprocity.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even in politically un-centralized societies, CGS on simple institutions can support large-scale conflicts.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Similarly, groups with institutions that more effectively foster cooperation are most likely to be the victor (Turchin 2003;2006).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Turchin 2003;2006
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Success and failure are often due to variation in the competing societies' technology, norms, and institutions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CGS can favor the evolution of warfare between cultural groups comprising hundreds to millions of mostly genetically unrelated individuals.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The increase in institutional size and complexity in many societies in the Holocene is striking, but the evidence does suggest that the organization of anonymous societies using institutions has roots in the Pleistocene.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Human societies that successfully suppress and sanction within-group violence, can still suffer high mortality from intergroup conflict.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaincorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Over the past 200 years, democracies have been replacing autocracies.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Economists have noted that competition among firms creates a Darwinian dynamic (Nelson & Winter 1982;Schumpeter et al. 1934;Veblen 1898).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nelson & Winter 1982
- Not checked yetcites Schumpeter et al. 1934
- Not checked yetcites Veblen 1898
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When those cultural differences influence a firm's success, CGS will occur.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, language only functions if there is a considerable degree of trust among speakers, who comprise groups far larger than families.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Economic competition is an important and typically peaceful form of CGS.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, language is necessary for sophisticated norms and institutions to function.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Variation in economic systems and political institutions between societies also affects military success.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, language differences are among the most important markers of group boundaries”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Competition between human organizations is certainly not restricted to violent conflict.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Part of the reason may be because democracies have been more likely to win wars (Reiter & Stam 2002).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiter & Stam 2002
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Nelson and Winter's (1982) highly cited classic argues that much of the important know-how influencing firm success is tacit, embedded in the skills of individuals and informal routines of interaction.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nelson and Winter's (1982)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some of the success and failure of individual firms is caused by the structure, management style, institutions, and other aspects of the culture of the firm itself.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and limited linguistic communication makes the diffusion of institutions between societies more difficult.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Victorious groups often expand their borders and absorb conquered peoples.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The differential proliferation (market entry and split) and extinction (market exit and bankruptcy) of firms influences the future population of firms and frequencies of business practices.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is consistent with the gradual increase in the complexity and size of societies over the last 10 millennia.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Agriculturalists find it easier to stockpile resources to feed standing armies than herders (Turchin 2006).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Turchin 2006
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural systems associated with Islam and Christianity have also spread in part through military conquests, facilitated by coercive as well as voluntary conversion of peoples dominated by the victors.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This information is hard to acquire by borrowing from successful firms and even selective hiring.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To summarize, warfare clearly demonstrates the requirements for CGS.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is partly responsible for ongoing rapid evolution in the domains of organizational rules, structure, business practices, and technology.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In small-scale societies, language differences generally mark the boundaries of groups that conflict (Nettle 1999).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nettle 1999 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Smith (2010) reviews the ample evidence that language plays an important role in solving collective action problems.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Smith (2010)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“It is easy to imagine how tight, innate constraints might affect language (Sampson 2005), but no evidence of such constraints has been observed.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sampson 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Communication systems in animals are largely restricted to costly signals or situations where deceptive signals can be detected and punished (Lachmann et al. 2001).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lachmann et al. 2001
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, at least a modicum of trust and cooperation seems necessary before a low-cost high-fidelity communication system could begin to evolve.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Much variation in norms and institutions is deeply embedded in the vocabulary and syntax of languages (Wierzbicka 1992).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wierzbicka 1992 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Languages are highly variable in every element that has been studied closely (Newmeyer 2004).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Newmeyer 2004
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Language differences thus help preserve the between-group variation that CGS acts on.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The stunning diversity of languages shows that differences between languages readily evolve (Nettle 1999).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nettle 1999 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ensuing emotional identification of followers with their leaders probably leads to followers adopting the speech variants of such leaders.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Language diversity suggests that language is an important component of CGS.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Social identity theorists have shown leader charisma to be essentially a recognition by followers that a leader is prototypical of the in-group (Steffens et al. 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Steffens et al. 2014
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Leaders of dialect evolution are typically individuals with high local prestige.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Donald reviews evidence that 19thcentury deaf-mutes could learn complex manual skills by imitation alone.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Donald
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such linguistically encoded information is often tacit knowledge that is shared by speakers but diffuses with difficulty to other languages.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The evolution of the capacity for languages that can serve cooperative functions is a considerable puzzle, because the existence of human language presupposes cooperation (Hurford 2007).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hurford 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Sociolinguists find that small but socially significant dialect differences emerge rapidly along social fault lines, implicating the active evolution of symbolic marking rather than, or in addition to, drift-like differentiation of languages (Labov 2001).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Labov 2001
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, a scenario in which the capacity for complex trustworthy language evolved by CGS and culture-led geneculture coevolution (see sect.2.2), is plausible.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dances and similar motor rituals are among the things that pre-linguistic but highly mimetic humans could likely acquire.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Expanding language families often mark the expansion of a complex of technical and social innovations; the Indo-European, Bantu, Tupi, and Austronesian families are examples, as we have noted in section 3.2.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Punishers do not even need to be cooperative themselves to furnish some of the benefits of cooperation (Eldakar & Wilson 2008), but many experiments have detected altruistic punishment (Fehr & Gachter 2002).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Eldakar & Wilson 2008
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“All successful small-scale common property systems have institutions for monitoring and punishing defectors (Ostrom 1990).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ostrom 1990
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Violent or peaceful competition between organizations depends upon the preservation of between-organization differences, and to compete successfully, an organization must solve dilemmas of cooperation among its members (Wilson 2002).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wilson 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Experimental studies using economic games support the findings of models.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In contemporary societies, measures of culturally inherited trust are correlated with economic performance (Algan & Cahuc 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Algan & Cahuc 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Violent or peaceful competition between organizations depends upon the preservation of between-organization differences, and to compete successfully, an organization must solve dilemmas of cooperation among its members (Wilson 2002).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wilson 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“CGS can favor reputational and other motivational systems that alter individual incentives, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for altruism (Fehr & Henrich 2003;Panchanathan & Boyd 2004).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fehr & Henrich 2003
- Not checked yetcites Panchanathan & Boyd 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Theoretical models (e.g., Boyd et al. 2003) and experiments (Fehr & Gachter 2002) suggest that moralistic punishment can be a very effective mechanism for promoting cooperation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd et al. 2003
- Not checked yetcites Fehr & Gachter 2002
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Punishers do not even need to be cooperative themselves to furnish some of the benefits of cooperation (Eldakar & Wilson 2008), but many experiments have detected altruistic punishment (Fehr & Gachter 2002).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fehr & Gachter 2002
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In experimental treatments designed to induce research participants to empathize with someone who is going to suffer a harm, many people will volunteer to help the victim at a cost to themselves.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Batson 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In experimental settings, people readily migrate from model societies that do not have sanctioning institutions to join ones that do (Gürerk et al. 2006).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gürerk et al. 2006
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, an innate capacity for the rapid cultural evolution of linguistic and other symbolic differences plausibly coevolved with group selection on cultural variation (see sect.2.2).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, we expect that the quality of institutions regulating crime and deviance will play a significant role in the performance of human organizations.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CGS will tend to favor societies that produce public goods like defense, transportation infrastructure, and a fair legal system.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One of the most important public goods produced in human societies are institutions of order and justice that protect individuals from predators and public goods from free-riders.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Models suggest that the evolution of altruistic punishment is likely to be frequency dependent (Boyd & Richerson 1992b).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 1992b
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If punishment is sufficiently costly to the punished and cheap to the punisher, a relatively few punishers suffice to encourage reluctant cooperators and would-be defectors to cooperate.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only a minority of participants act altruistically.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“Corrupt elites tend to be replaced by competitors who provide better governance.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Turchin and Nefedov (2009)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Historical and ethnographic data suggest that variation in the effectiveness of controlling self-seeking behavior is related to all three forms of group selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the modern world, large numbers of migrants move from countries with low norms of civic cooperation and poor rule of law to countries with more civic cooperation and better rule of law (Boyd & Richerson 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The increasing acceptance of the rule of law in Early Modern Europe is fundamental to that region's explosive demographic and economic growth (North et al. 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites North et al. 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Successful empires, such as those of ancient Rome and Han China, had more effective institutions for producing public goods and incorporating new populations into their expanding polities than their competitors.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Much of the last five millennia of human history can be read as a slow, halting increase in the effectiveness of such institutions (e.g., Fukuyama 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fukuyama 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, we have ample evidence that internal regulatory systems control deviance and solve dilemmas of cooperation to varying degrees of effectiveness.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Religions contain effective mechanisms for reducing internal variation through sacred principles and norm-enforcing rules of reward, punishment, and exclusion, which bind participants into moral communities (Atran 2010;Graham & Haidt 2010;Rappaport 1999).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Atran 2010
- Not checked yetcites Graham & Haidt 2010
- Not checked yetcites Rappaport 1999
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Numerous studies have found evidence for group-functional properties of religions (Atran 2002;Atran & Norenzayan 2005;Boyer 2001).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Atran 2002
- Not checked yetcites Atran & Norenzayan 2005
- Not checked yetcites Boyer 2001
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“As Darwin (1874) argued in The Descent of Man, many human groups meet the basic criteria necessary for selection to operate: heritable variation and competition, the outcome of which is based on that heritable variation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Darwin (1874)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ethnographic evidence of the prerequisites for and operation of CGS in the simplest societies suggests that CGS has operated in our lineage for a few tens of millennia, if not longer.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This variation is transmitted to new generations by the human capacity to acquire norms and social institutions via imitation and teaching.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“They supply a stable and enforceable moral code, held as inviolable by religious adherents (Atran 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Atran 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Belief in moralizing high gods is associated with cooperative altruism (Johnson 2005;Shariff et al. 2009) and willingness to punish non-cooperators (McKay et al. 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McKay et al. 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We submit that the evidence sketched here is more than sufficient to justify taking the CGS hypothesis seriously as a basic explanation for our species' highly unusual ability to create large societies with widespread cooperation between non-relatives.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The success of a number of key cultural innovations that generate well-documented associations between in-group prosociality and religious/ritual participation appear to be clear examples of group functionality (Henrich et al. 2010a;Norenzayan & Shariff 2008).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henrich et al. 2010a
- Not checked yetcites Norenzayan & Shariff 2008
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If so, the cooperative imperatives produced by rudimentary culturally transmitted institutions may well have shaped our innate social psychology.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evidence we have outlined in this article makes the case that culture varies between human groups ranging in size from organizations within societies to ethnolinguistic tribes and nations, and even multi-ethnic empires.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Belief in moralizing high gods is associated with cooperative altruism (Johnson 2005;Shariff et al. 2009) and willingness to punish non-cooperators (McKay et al. 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson 2005
- Not checked yetcites Shariff et al. 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Cooperatively breeding primates, the callitrichid monkeys, consistently show enhanced performance in social learning tasks (Burkart & van Schaik 2010;Snowdon 2001) compared to their independently breeding sister taxa”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Social transmission.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Burkart & van Schaik 2010
- Not checked yetcites Snowdon 2001
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Generally, we can expect group traits to directly cause group adaptation only when partners are clonal or when there is extreme repression of competition”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gardner & Grafen 2009
- Not checked yetcites Okasha & Paternotte 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Intuition only promotes cooperation among those who come from a culture of cooperation and trust, where cooperation is thus advantageous”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Capraro & Cococcioni 2015
- Not checked yetcites Rand & Kraft-Todd 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, current variation in income inequality fully accounts for any cultural difference in homicide rates between the northern and southern states”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Daly & Wilson 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A multi-level partition, such as CGS, is only warranted in the latter sort of case.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Similarly, behavioral differences between collectivist and individualist cultures are supposedly maintained by internalized social norms and beliefs (e.g., Markus & Kitayama 1991), yet these differences can disappear when the expectations of the different cultural groups are matched”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Yamagishi et al. 2008
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many alleged examples of group selection likely reflect individual-level adaptations.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Both of these dimensions of the debate regarding human evolution can vary independently”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rand & Nowak 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By enforcing norms of cooperation, institutions play a critical role in stabilizing payoff structures that simultaneously optimize social and individual welfare.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, experiments show that people “vote with their feet” and learn to choose institutions with sanctions over a sanction-free alternative”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gürerk et al. 2006
- Not checked yetcites Rockenbach & Milinski 2006
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Empirical support for the SHH comes from evidence that experimentally inducing greater intuitive thinking promotes cooperation in one-shot anonymous economic games relative to inducing deliberation”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cone & Rand 2014
- Not checked yetcites Rand et al. 2012
- Not checked yetcites Rand & Kraft-Todd 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When institutions can homogenize individual behavior through norm enforcement, social welfare and individual welfare are maximized by the same strategy.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, callitrichid monkeys not only show high levels of social learning, but also the best evidence for teaching among nonhuman primates comes from callitrichids (Dell '-Mour et al. 2009;Humle & Snowdon 2008;Rapaport 2011), and not from the intelligent, yet independently breeding great apes”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Social transmission.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dell '-Mour et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Humle & Snowdon 2008
- Not checked yetcites Rapaport 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Everyone's first experience of cooperation is in the resolution (or not) of parent-offspring conflict”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chisholm 2003
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It follows that cultural group selection (CGS) reflects group effectiveness in organizing in-group trust and cooperation, rather than winning (in)direct intergroup competitions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While it is unclear exactly what types of adaptations can be hypothesized to exist via culture-led gene-culture coevolution, research on the proximate mechanisms underlying group cooperation does not seem to contain the footprint of intergroup competition as a strong selection pressure shaping group cooperation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“First, secure attachment is associated with less fear and aggression”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cassidy 2008
- Not checked yetcites Fearon et al. 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Furthermore, intergroup competition often is multi-dimensional so that losses on one issue can be, and often are, offset by gains on another issue”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aaldering & De Dreu 2012
- Not checked yetcites De Dreu & Carnevale 2003
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Theory of mind is the beginning of cultureshared or “we” understanding/intentionality”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tomasello et al. 2005
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sum, comparative evidence supports the idea that cooperative breeding installed in our ancestors the psychological predispositions that functioned as the pre-adaptive substrate upon which CGS could eventually be built”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Psychological and cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in nonhuman primates also arose when our hominin ancestors, but none of the other great apes, started to engage in cooperative breeding.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similar to inter-individual interactions (Deutsch 1973;Schelling 1960), intergroup competition can vary in the degree of corresponding versus non-corresponding interests”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Deutsch 1973
- Not checked yetcites Schelling 1960
- Not checked yetcites Bornstein 2003
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, a meta-analysis of studies using cooperation games in psychology, economics, and sociology revealed robust intergroup discrimination in cooperation being due to in-group love rather than out-group hate”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Balliet et al. 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Information donation (in the form of functionally referential food calls, teaching, or vocal cooperation; Takahashi et al. 2013) is thus over-represented in cooperatively breeding primates compared to independently breeding ones.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Takahashi et al. 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“To explain, we refer to Weingarten and Chisholm's (2009) use of Bowlby's (1946) insight that “the psychological problem of ensuring persistent co-operative behaviour” (p.62) in groups was solved by the evolution of the capacity of infants to develop, first, an attachment to (a powerful emotional valuation of) mothers and others, then, as they mature, to groups of others, group leaders, and group “”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Weingarten and Chisholm 2009
- Not checked yetcites Bowlby 1946
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“because many of the “mechanisms that maintain intergroup variation” are already part of the attachment process.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Second, the Russian farm fox studies (Belyaev et al. 1985;Trut 1999) show that artificial selection for “tameness” (reduced fear/aggression) succeeded, not because “genes for” tameness were selected, but because of the delayed development of fearful/ aggressive behavior in tame strains compared to non-selected, wild strains.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Belyaev et al. 1985
- Not checked yetcites Trut 1999
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Social psychology has discovered that parochial altruism can be motivated by both in-group love and out-group hate”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brewer 1999
- Not checked yetcites Greenwald & Pettigrew 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, in-group love, not intergroup competition, is driving cultural group selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, there is archaeological evidence for symbol construction, formation, and use that predates the appearance of Homo sapiens (circa 200,000 years ago).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Agustin Fuentes and Marc Kissel
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mania & Mania 1988
- Not checked yetcites Clark & Brown 2001
- Not checked yetcites Roebroeks et al. 2012
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but the answers by Saudi and Lebanese citizens to one of two questions about the role of clergy in the political system are not truly quantitative measures.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Agustin Fuentes and Marc Kissel
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We would be remiss if we did not note that cultural F ST does not function in the same way as a genetic F ST does.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Agustin Fuentes and Marc Kissel
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The drive toward complex cooperation and the incipient patterns of CGS are significantly older than suggested in the target article.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Agustin Fuentes and Marc Kissel
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We argue that pressures for CGS are particularly strong when groups face ecological and human-made threat.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In particular, we argue that ecological and historical threats to human societies strengthen CGS pressures.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, ecological and historical threats can critically moderate the strength of CGS pressures”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In fact, oxytocin, an evolutionary ancient neuropeptide pivotal in social bonding, modulates in-group love rather than out-group hate”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites De Dreu et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Shalvi & De Dreu 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it follows that increases in ecological and historical threat contribute to the conditions for CGS to occur.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there is substantial evidence from field, experimental, computational, and genetic studies suggesting that exposure to threat increases the strength of social norms and punishment of deviance”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third and finally, intergroup competition may not be necessary to explain the (genetic) evolution of psychological adaptations supporting (parochial) cooperation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“All such models employ the phenotypic gambit (Grafen 1984), in which complex transmission processes are treated as though they were the product of a single allele of the genome.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Grafen 1984
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Darwin noticed that selective breeding of mammals for tameness entailed a pattern of similar side-effects of domestication to human society in distinct species.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Darwin 1871
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, there really are no purely genetic group selection models in the literature.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Such models represent equally any transmission process, cultural, genetic, or interaction between the two, that depend only on vertical transmission from parents to offspring (Gintis 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gintis 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Driven by intergroup competition, social norms, beliefs, and practices can evolve in ways that more effectively tap into a wide variety of evolved psychological mechanisms to foster group-beneficial behavior.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“This is evidence for a very straightforward culture-led group selection mechanism in which an increasingly complex division of labor and social norms that rewarded cooperation (Tomasello 2014) favored genetic changes that produced a more domesticated and prosocial human disposition.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tomasello 2014
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The kinship systems that dominate life in small-scale societies variously harness, extend, and suppress evolved psychological mechanisms for dealing with relatives (Mathew et al. 2013).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew et al. 2013 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Prior to the control of fire, hominins inhabited trees at night as a defense against predators.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wrangham & Carmody 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The increased social importance of communication in human society rewarded genetic changes that facilitate speech.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Belyaev (1979) corroborated this insight, studying captive silver foxes bred for tameness.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Belyaev (1979)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Humans are unique in possessing the neural machinery for rapid manual-brachial movements that allows for precision stone-throwing, which depends on the brain's capacity to orchestrate a series of rapidly changing muscle movements (Calvin 1983).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Calvin 1983
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Theoretical work (Boyd & Lorderbaum 1987) reveals that the success of reciprocating strategies depends on the particular constellation of other strategies present”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Lorderbaum 1987
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Because predators have an instinctive fear of fire, the control of fire permitted hominins, who were already bipedal, to abandon climbing almost completely (Wrangham & Carmody 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wrangham & Carmody 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Because the S allele has been associated with more aversive reactions to moral violations in groups”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mrazek et al. (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Thus, it is not surprising that outside of humans reciprocity is rare and limited to low cost behaviors (Clutton-Brock 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Clutton-Brock 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The existence of such switches can actually increase the variation among groups in phenotypes, fueling the engine of cultural group selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural group selection offers a plausible explanation for the development and spread of this uniquely human phenomenon”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggests that petkeeping requires the degree of rapid social learning found only in our species.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There is no evidence that pets increase the reproductive potential of their owners”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herzog 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, the existing evidence for the importance of kinship, reciprocity, reputation, and evoked responses for human cooperation and sociality contributes to a prima facie case for cultural group selection”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, what's missed is that such evoked responses are precisely the kind of psychological switches that cultural group selection could harness.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the putative health and psychological benefits of living with animals are not as well-established as commonly believed (Herzog 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herzog 2011
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We fully support cultural selection as the principal explanation for the degree of cooperation among humans”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
boosteddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the large individual and cultural differences observed in attachment to animals suggest that learning and culture play a larger role than biology when it comes to bringing them into our lives.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The meta-norms (i.e., norms promoting punishment of defectors and punishment-shirkers alike) are subject to selection as well.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sum, pet-keeping shows the marks of a cultural group-selected institution.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In short, pet-keeping follows the laws of fashion.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“some norms can be beneficial on a certain level and harmful on another by moving a culture to the non-cooperative equilibrium.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Patent law in its current form impedes rather than promotes innovation (Boldrin & Levine 2008)”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boldrin & Levine 2008
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The frozen plasticity framework takes into account the relations between the cultural norms, which are seldom unrelated to each other”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Flegr 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are no novel predictions made by cultural selection theory.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although Richerson and colleagues criticize evolutionary psychological approaches, it is evolutionary psychology that has inspired scores of novel, specific, and empirically confirmed predictions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Buss 2005;2014
- Not checked yetcites Buss & Reeve 2003
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the empirical evidence presented does, in our opinion, still fail to conclusively demonstrate that CGS explains human cooperation better than the competing hypotheses.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, the only current quantitative empirical evidence testing whether cooperative behaviour is culturally transmitted does not support this idea.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“And if individuals' cooperativeness is likely to change across their lifetimes, then we should not expect culturally heritable variation in the behaviour of human groups across generations.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More critically, no evidence is offered that these traits arise from cultural group selection; we argue that apparent group-level effects are by-products arising from individual-level benefits when this alternative is taken seriously.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, they sampled only one or a few populations per society and therefore did not include population (or village) replicates from each society.Thus, they cannot distinguish whether cultural norms or any of the many other variables that vary between the study populations (e.g., population demographics, habitat variation, climate) cause the observed behavioural differences.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henrich et al. 2004;2006;2010a
- Not checked yetcites Herrmann et al. 2008
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“I argue that demographic selection, migration, and cultural diffusion, three mechanisms of institutional change, have little in common.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Type 1 CGS is more conducive to true altruism, because it short-cuts adaptive individual decisions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Contrary to what is stated in section 4.1, CGS is not, then, characterized by group-level selection pressures counteracting individual-level pressures, pushing individuals to sacrifice their own fitness for the group.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The authors' last two types of CGS, thus, do not seem capable of delivering what CGS is widely thought to explain, namely, altruism (André & Morin 2011;Morin 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites André & Morin 2011
- Not checked yetcites Morin 2014
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural group selection (CGS) does indeed, as the target article argues, play an important role in explaining human cooperation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Groups with norms enforcing cooperation tend to expand and displace other groups, although, as the target article notes, complexities arise because of the costs of cooperating, the costs of punishing defectors, and movement of individuals and norms between groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CGS has a hard time explaining the pervasiveness and intensity of guilt, motivations for reparations, extreme sensitivity to what others think, concern for other's welfare, pity, commitment, empathy, philanthropy, and pride in generosity.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, the Catholic Church's prohibition of birth control fosters group growth.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“People prefer partners and group members who have plentiful resources that they generously and reliably share (albeit selectively) with their partners.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social selection can explain extreme human prosocial traits that CGS cannot.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Despite formal models (Frank 2006;Tanaka 1996;Wolf et al. 1999) and detailed descriptions with examples from many species (Flinn & Alexander 2007;Lyon & Montgomerie 2012;Tobias et al. 2012), social selection has been neglected as an explanation for human prosociality.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Flinn & Alexander 2007
- Not checked yetcites Lyon & Montgomerie 2012
- Not checked yetcites Tobias et al. 2012
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Once established, cultural norms for in-group cooperation create forces of natural selection that give advantages to individuals with tendencies to learn and conform to those norms, as well as to their groups, in a recursive cycle that gives rise to capacities for complex culture.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such traits are, however, expected outcomes from social selection that gives advantages to those preferred as relationship partners or group members.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social selection may explain how self-interested social choices could have created selection forces by which humans domesticated themselves.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CGS shares with biological group selection the same problem of porous boundaries.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If homogenization of between-group traits occurs on a time scale shorter than that needed for the consequences of between-group competition to materialize, then group competition will be obviated.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, these differences do not emerge from changes at the behavioral level assumed by their model of cultural evolution, but are organizational changes.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Several studies have demonstrated that human genetic variation is predominantly clinal, with differentiation between populations being strongly predicted by geographic distance across a variety of biological markers (Handley et al. 2007).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Handley et al. 2007
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Jointly, these idea systems framed the behavioral patterns and modes of social organization Figure 1 (Read).Phylogeny for Polynesian societies based on the reconstructed sequence of changes in the structural patterns for the sibling kin terms from a sample of the Polynesian kinship terminologies.The specific patterns, based on attributes associated with the sibling kin terms, are discussed in Read”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Balikci 1970
- Not checked yetcites Read 2005
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cheating, in the sense of opting out of acting in accordance with being a sealing partner, was not a viable option in a context in which individual hunters would likely not survive without averaging hunting risks over a pool of hunters.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Individual Netsilik hunters would likely not survive without averaging hunting risks over a pool of hunters.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural idea systems like this operate and evolve at an organizational, rather than an individual, level”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A clinal pattern of variation is consistent with an “isolation by distance” (IBD) model (Wright 1943), in which individuals tend to migrate limited distances relative to the total geographic range of the species.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wright 1943
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“human sociocultural organizations … [have] representations, rules, relationships, management processes and function associated with these organizations, which are different from, and have vastly more transformative and generative capability than, those at the individual level”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lane et al. 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The system of sealing partners was, in effect, the antithesis of sharing through the individual traits of altruism and cooperation since individual benefits arose through collective ownership and rules of sharing expressed through the social contract.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Consequently, the conceptual boundary for the organization of sealing partners was impervious, given the technologies available to them, to any competing, individual strategy.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This result suggests that the relative influence of cultural barriers and geographic effects can vary across different cultural markers in comparable populations, just as is the case for different genetic markers (i.e., autosomal DNA, mitochondrial DNA, and Y-chromosome; Jobling 2012).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jobling 2012
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such a pattern of predominantly clinal variation is consistent with IBD-like cultural diffusion processes.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, two sampling locations can produce significant F ST values simply due to their geographic separation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This renders these estimates difficult to interpret, since, as in the genetic case, apparent population structure could be an artefact of discontinuous spatial sampling, rather than cultural barriers.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This result is particularly pertinent to discussions about human evolution, because the folk song data are drawn from small-scale indigenous societies whose lifestyles and group structure better approximate those of our ancestors than the large-scale multiethnic nation states studied by Bell et al. (2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brown et al. 2014
- Not checked yetcites Bell et al. 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under IBD, a gradual blending of one population into the next is predicted, rather than group barriers.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“First, Brown et al. (2014) examined group-level folk song differentiation among nine indigenous ethnolinguistic groups in Taiwan.They found significant cultural differentiation between groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brown et al. 2014
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The spread of a religion does not entail the spread of all its cultural features.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Syncretism demonstrates that the spread of a religion due to the dominance of a cultural group does not entail the successful reproduction of any particular aspect of the cultural systems associated with that group.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Even if every single refusal of a drink is punished by proxies for fitness-decreasing PIEs, the extended pattern of abstinence from alcohol will correlate with being healthier, having more well-functioning relationships, and a better economyself-controlled behavior (as an extended pattern) enhances fitness, assessed in the long run (Baum 2015;Rachlin 2004).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baum 2015
- Not checked yetcites Rachlin 2004
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Which values and practices were adopted, however, seems to have little to do with whether they contributed to success, but instead with how those practices individually appealed to the conquered peoples.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The reproduction of cultural systems in cases where cultural group selection may occur is typically incomplete, with only certain cultural traits being adopted by less successful cultural groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“We note that, in the absence of stable individual level trait differences between neighbouring groups, the most important forms of variation for cultural group selection may be group-level traits (Smaldino 2014), such as the presence or absence of particular religious or political institutions, rather than the values, stories, songs, or material possessions of individuals.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Smaldino 2014
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even when it is clear that selective conquest, migration, or imitation has occurred, these selective forces rarely involve the total replacement of all the features of the less successful group with all the features of the more successful group.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We remain unconvinced, however, that the evidence demonstrates that CGS is a particularly strong force in cultural evolution because selection mechanismsconquest, imitation, and migrationfrequently do not involve selection between cultural groups, but instead work at the level of individual cultural traits.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To a large degree then, which cultural traits spread in cases of differential competitive success is explained by factors other than the role those traits played in that success.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Moreover, the coercive authority dynamic accounts for the ubiquity of institutions that asymmetrically benefit the powerful, spanning etiquette norms (e.g., Trobriand Islanders: Malinowski 1926) and food taboos (e.g., the Etoro: Kelly 1980; the Aranda: Spencer & Gillen 1927;and the Sanumá: Taylor 1981).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Malinowski 1926
- Not checked yetcites Kelly 1980
- Not checked yetcites Spencer & Gillen 1927
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Studies of punishment in animal societies show that CGS is not necessary for the coercive enforcement of group-adaptive behavior (Singh and Boomsma 2015).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Singh and Boomsma 2015
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“An individual act of cooperation, as well as of altruism, each of which might even be followed by fitness-decreasing PIEs in the short run, can nevertheless be fitness-beneficial when repeated over time.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rachlin 2002
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Teaching and following norms and rules are practices that function to overcome selfish and impulsive behavior.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Individuals can have key roles in producing group-functional rules if they have sufficient power or influence to institute cultural changes and enforce new rules.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That said, the selective social learner is influenced by factors beyond those cited by Richerson et al. (those being a penchant for conformity, the sway of prestige, affinity for cultural norms, or group membership biases).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Parties of similarly powerful individuals can also establish and maintain rules to control each other's behavior.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here we briefly reviewed evidence that individuals motivated by self-interest can create group-functional culture through coercion, consensus, or both.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Young learners' reliance on their own understanding of what is correct, true, or possible should not be underestimated: Their preferences for native-accented speakers (Corriveau et al. 2013), adults (Jaswal & Neely 2006), and familiar speakers (Corriveau & Harris 2009) are reversed if they learn that such sources have proven inaccurate.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Corriveau et al. 2013
- Not checked yetcites Jaswal & Neely 2006
- Not checked yetcites Corriveau & Harris 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although our discussion is largely restricted to rules controlling deviance, these arguments apply to the development of other domains of group-functional culture as well, such as institutions that reward otherwise costly behaviors (Glowacki & Wrangham 2013) and prosocial religion (Norenzayan et al. 2016).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Glowacki & Wrangham 2013
- Not checked yetcites Norenzayan et al. 2016
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the development of group-functional culture does not require that novelty originate with coercive authorities.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A growing body of developmental research characterizes even the youngest social learners as active participants in the learning process, whose selectivity can act to preserve or cull testimonial information on the basis of its accuracy, support, and coherence with other beliefs (Stephens et al. 2015).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stephens et al. 2015
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Last, group consent can interact with authorities to produce group-functional culture.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Even more relevant to CGS, research in this field suggests that children make rational learning decisions on the basis of whether or not the messages they receive from informants violate their existing understanding of the world (Sobel & Kushnir 2013).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sobel & Kushnir 2013
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, such groups will often respond to some form of selection and many case studies suggest that they do (sects.5 and 6).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R2. CGS is a framework
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The empirical argument in our article is that keeping accounts of group-level cultural variation, and on the impact of cultures selecting genes, is frequently necessary to explain events in human evolution.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R2. CGS is a framework
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We note that, (1) many of the cultural traits from which we derived cultural F ST estimates do reflect cooperative altruism, as is made clear in the appendix.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, when a 16-month-old corrects an informant who labels a shoe as a ball, upholding culturally specific labels, what may appear to be an early tendency toward conformity may involve critical appraisals of messages, along with epistemic inferences about the informant.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“By definition, the regression of individual-level fitness on individual-level allele frequency is negative for any altruistic trait (a result from Price 1972).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Price 1972
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Kelly (1985) developed a CGS explanation for the Nuer expansion based on the classic ethnography of Evans-Pritchard (1940).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R2. CGS is a framework
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kelly 1985
- Not checked yetcites Evans-Pritchard 1940
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Such groups often compete (target article, sect.5).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites target article, sect.5
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Many human groups have formal criteria for membership and are often symbolically marked by language, dialect, and other differences.
In the paper
“The CGS framework has been used to develop explanations for concrete phenomena, for example, the expansion of the Nuer at the expense of the Dinka in the Southern Sudan in the 19th century.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R2. CGS is a framework
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kelly 1985
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 157
- Probably not a substantial claim. 154
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among small political or ethnic groups, nations, and religious majorities, we consistently report F ST values greater than 0.01, with some traits showing F ST scores above 0.6.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Moreover, stronger N400 responses mediated cultural differences in a number of attitudes and behaviors, including higher self-control and ethnocentrism, but lower creativity, among Chinese as compared to U.S. groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mu et al. 2015
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These animals developed humanly attractive faces with short snouts, floppy ears, patches of white fur on their heads, and curly tails (Gibbons 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gibbons 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Indigenous peoples of Amazonia, for example, commonly make pets of captured wild animals such as monkeys and birds.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diamond 1993
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further, social norms governing relationships with pets can shift dramatically over time.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pet-keeping is highly variable across cultures in both frequency and form.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“unlike language, music, and prohibitions against sex with first-degree relatives, pet-keeping is not a human universal.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This practice, however, is rare among tribal peoples of New Guinea (Diamond 1993).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diamond 1993
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In Medieval Europe, cats were routinely subjected to torture and mass slaughter, as they were linked with witchcraft.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bradshaw 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, the frequency and form of pet-keeping vary widely among cultures.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“with the complete transformation of the cat from pariah to household pet occurring by the end of the 18th century (Bradshaw 2013).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bradshaw 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Third, preferences for pets are transmitted vertically from parent to child and horizontally across cultural landscapes.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the United States, over the last two decades, the proportion of homes with companion animals has increased only slightly while the amount of money Americans spend on their pets has risen fivefold.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Dogs substantially increase the success of Mayangna hunters in Nicaragua”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Koster 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The acquisition of horses by Apache and Comanche Indians in the 17th century profoundly changed the nature of tribal warfare on the Great Plains of the United States (Hämäläinen 2003).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hämäläinen 2003
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“in the aftermath of World War II, Japan ended state Shintoism and hundreds of religious groups sprang up in a very quick succession; Iannaccone 1998.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Iannaccone 1998
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“in relatively poor regions Europeans settled in large numbers and implemented institutions that encourage prosperity today (Acemoglu et al. 2001;2002).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Acemoglu et al. 2001
- Not checked yetcites Acemoglu et al. 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Loci related to olfaction, immunity, and metabolism (connected to subsistence strategies) are among those most positively selected in recent human history (Akey 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Akey 2009
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The tendency to copy others' behaviour was highly variable and individuals were less likely to copy more cooperative strategies, that is, behaviour that bore higher costs by depositing more money into a group pot.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lamba 2014
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“(3) individuals are more selfish in larger populations and less likely to copy increasingly cooperative behaviour (Lamba 2014;Lamba & Mace 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lamba 2014
- Not checked yetcites Lamba & Mace 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, no significant differences in cooperation were found between the two cultural groups when taking into account individual socio-economic characteristics, which in turn best predicted the variation in cooperative behaviour (Silva & Mace 2014;2015).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Silva & Mace 2014;2015
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Individual and neighbourhood exposure to conflict explained a reduction in out-group cooperation, but crucially had either no effect or also reduced cooperation toward the in-group.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Silva & Mace 2014;2015
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Shakers had 6,000 members in the mid-19th century but the norm of celibacy shrank the group by outmigration and lack of reproduction, so only one small community remains.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We outline here the evidence that supports the hypothesis that cultural group selection (CGS) was and still is an important force in the evolution of human societies.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 1. Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a result of these three features, we should also find evidence of: (4) group-level functionality in cultures, particularly in their social norms and institutions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 1. Introduction
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Human cooperation is highly unusual.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Three distinct CGS processes exist, united by being driven by group-level heritable cultural variation, but differing in the mechanism of selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2. The cultural group selection hypothesis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“We typically live in large, rule-bound, anonymous societies in which the mean genetic relatedness between members is low (Moffett 2013).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moffett 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We live in large groups composed mostly of non-relatives.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In sum, if CGS is an active process in human social evolution, then we should see evidence that: (1) culture acts as an inheritance system; (2) group-variable culturally transmitted social norms and institutions are among the domains of culture so transmitted; and (3) success or failure in intergroup competition is frequently caused by institutional variation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 1. Introduction
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“If people tend to differentially copy locally common behaviors, the homogenizing effect of migration will be reduced and group differences will be maintained (Boyd & Richerson 1985).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2. Conformist social learning.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 1985
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The dramatic changes of modern environments are resulting in detectable selection on genes related to health and fertility (Byars et al. 2010;Kohler et al. 1999).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Byars et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Kohler et al. 1999
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the three CGS processes described in the previous section have operated over spans of time consistent with the evolution of genes, then culture-led gene-culture coevolution may have favored genes that encourage group advantageous behavior.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given their short history, selection on modern groups will not have had a major impact on genes, but we argue that it has been very important in the ongoing evolution of complex societies.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2. The cultural group selection hypothesis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural evolution will thus tend to be the leading process, and genetic evolution the lagging process, in gene-culture coevolution.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Evidence currently exists that supports the hypothesis of culture-led gene-culture coevolution for a few simple genetic traits whose function is well known, but unfortunately not yet for genes related to behavior.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent molecular evidence suggests that the genes associated with these and other phenotypic changes swept to appreciable frequencies in the Holocene, as agricultural diets exerted selective pressures on digestive physiology (Itan et al. 2009;Tishkoff et al. 2007) and human populations became dense enough to carry epidemic diseases (Wolfe et al. 2007).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Itan et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Tishkoff et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Wolfe et al. 2007
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Infants younger than one year prefer puppets that are helpful to others over those that are antisocial (Hamlin et al. 2011), suggesting that our social predispositions are partly innate.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hamlin et al. 2011
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A population of more docile individuals could then permit the cultural evolution of slightly more sophisticated and effective norms.This would allow groups to maintain more reliable cooperation and tools, which would, in turn, be favored by CGS acting on this variation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2.2. The tribal social instincts hypothesis
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So far, too few quantitative studies have been performed on CGS and competing processes to allow for much but qualitative judgments.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note that many cultural evolutionary processes generate cultural variation and cause evolution.CGS is only relevant to situations in which groups compete; it is not a complete theory of the evolution of cultural variation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CGS is potentially acting on more than one of these groups simultaneously, leading many authors to speak of multi-level selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2. The cultural group selection hypothesis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The resulting diminution of unsuccessful groups may weaken their competitive ability and/or encourage leaders to adopt successful foreign norms, strengthening the two processes defined previously.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 2009
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All three selective processes will tend to reduce grouplevel variation.Thus, the standing group-level variation is a balance between variation-creating and variation-reducing forces.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is an empirical matter whether cultural evolutionary processes can maintain substantial between-group variation or whether, as is the case with genetic variation, appreciable group variation is hard to maintain.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evolution of complex societies in the last five millennia has generated a diverse array of social groups that can vary culturally, compete, and be subject to group selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 2. The cultural group selection hypothesis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Language phylogenies appear to be a reasonable proxy for population movements, often matching phylogenetic patterns based on genes reasonably well (Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1988), albeit not perfectly.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cavalli-Sforza et al. 1988
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recently, phylogenetic methods, originally borrowed from biology, have been applied to detecting descent-with-modification patterns in cultural data (Mace & Jordan 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mace & Jordan 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Historical linguists established that languages evolved by descent with modification before Darwin and his contemporaries began to apply the idea to biological evolution (Müller 1862).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Müller 1862
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Currie and Mace (2009) found that the area over which a language is spoken is more closely related to its political complexity than to any other variable tested, consistent with the hypothesis that CGS on social organization features correlated with language played an important role in the creation of patterns of linguistic diversity.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Currie and Mace 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Certainly, no evidence carefully examined to date suggests that non-evolutionary patterns dominate the archaeological and historical record, as would be suggested by strong versions of the evoked culture and improvisational intelligence hypotheses.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonhuman social learners tested so far lack the skills necessary to acquire a large repertoire of complex skills, and there are so far no reports of nonhumans having acquired complex traits (traits composed of more than two or three separate innovations) by social learning.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If CGS processes are to operate on cultural variation, then we must document appreciable variation at the level of groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4. Culture exhibits group-level variation
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Individuals use a variety of strategies to acquire social information, tending to favor success-based strategies when such information is available to them; conformist strategies are typically employed when payoff-based information is unavailable or uninformative (Molleman et al. 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.1. A cognitive system for accurate, voluminous cultural transmission
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Molleman et al. 2014
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They detected a strong effect of vertical inheritance of cultural traits related to family and kinship and the economy, and a medium vertical effect on traits related to social stratification and house type.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 3.2. Descent with modification
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Guglielmino et al. (1995)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, children as young as 14 months will readily provide instrumental help to an adult, and children of 18 months will help and cooperate with unfamiliar adults.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They tend to preserve locally successful social behaviors and reduce the diffusion of cultural variation from one social group to another (see sects.2.1 and 6.1).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Children show adult levels of racial in-group bias by age 6 (Dunham et al. 2008), although language difference seems to be a more intuitively salient marker than differences in skin color (Kinzler et al. 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dunham et al. 2008
- Not checked yetcites Kinzler et al. 2009
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, preschool children preferred to learn both linguistic and non-linguistic information from individuals who spoke with the same accent as themselves (Kinzler et al. 2011), and 12-month-olds preferentially copy the food selection choices of adult native speakers of their own language (Shutts et al. 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kinzler et al. 2011
- Not checked yetcites Shutts et al. 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Identification with a group sometimes results in derogation of other groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Attitudes toward out-groups are certainly not invariably invidious, however, contrary to some theories of ethnocentrism (Brewer 2007).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brewer 2007
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Norm transmission has not been extensively studied in adults or undergraduate volunteers.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ethnographers and historians tacitly assume that individual variation for normative behaviors is typically small within groups, is large between groups, and grows larger with time in most lineages.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Equation ( 1) says that traits will be favored if they have zero individual costs and positive group benefits.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If this is correct, the scope for CGS is large.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Group selection on genes is generally implausible because migration between groups prevents substantial genetic variation from arising in groups larger than those composed of close kin.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4. Culture exhibits group-level variation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“However, in some societies, participants sanctioned high contributors as well as low contributors.In such societies, rates of cooperation in the games were low.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Herrmann et al. (2008)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Institutions are important because they create and maintain variation between groups while simultaneously damping down variation among individuals within groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Symbolic markers thus serve to identify members of distinct social groups and subgroups and to define who is and who is not entitled to benefits from the activities of the organization.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Institutions are probably an ancient feature of human social life, ancient enough to have generated the coevolution of genes related to social behavior.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Interestingly, the Sukuma have a unique, elaborate institution of village governance, which the Pimbwe lack, and the Sukuma organize the provision of public goods much more effectively than the Pimbwe.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Paciotti et al. (2005)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a system of commonly accepted norms, they are a property of a group and often vary qualitatively from group to group.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, early experiments showed a strong conformity effect (Jacobs & Campbell 1961), and rather firm socialization pressure with normative content is observed in some experiments (Baum et al. 2004;2012).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.2. The transmission of social norms
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jacobs & Campbell 1961
- Not checked yetcites Baum et al. 2004;2012
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The Sukuma, who are an expanding population of agro-pastoral colonizers, were found to have one of the highest average offers in the ultimatum game ever measured.The Pimbwe, in contrast, made quite low offers.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Paciotti et al. (2005)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Greif's (2006) study of the evolution of early modern Mediterranean trading systems notes that institutional evolution occurs when ongoing changes destabilize an equilibrium previously regulated by an institution.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Greif's (2006)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“If punishing is sufficiently cheap for punishers and sufficiently costly to the punished, punishment can stabilize any behavior (Boyd & Richerson 1992b).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 1992b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Institutions only function when large numbers of people conform to them.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In 32 present-day foraging societies, Hill et al. (2011) found evidence of frequent inter-band relations, low group genetic relatedness of co-residents within a band, and substantial interaction networks consisting of unrelated individuals, all structured by institutions that differ from society to society.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hill et al. (2011)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The average raid includes 315 men, with some raids including up to a thousand.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew & Boyd 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A theoretically significant set of institutions are those that regulate family life and small-scale partnerships.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Kinship institutions specify the responsibilities of family members toward each other.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mating according to such a contract confers social benefits of the cooperative breeding system on the couple, and mating outside it is often significantly sanctioned.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Combatants experience the hazards of war, but the benefits of victory are widely shared, even by those who avoid the risks.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a consequence of warfare, the cultural traits of the successful groups often spread and the cultural traits of defeated groups and polities often decline.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For instance, in the Turkana, a tribe of about one million people living in northern Kenya, 1% of mortality among Turkana men is from violence among Turkana, whereas 50% is from inter-ethnic raids (Mathew & Boyd 2011).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew & Boyd 2011
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Losers of military competitions are sometimes killed outright and are sometimes voluntarily or involuntarily incorporated into the victorious society.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two conditions needed for warfare to cause CGS are (1) that variation in cultural traits between groups influences variation in success in warfare, and (2) that variation in success in warfare influences the spread of cultural traits.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The strategies used to formulate tribal institutions are widely applied to modern organizations such as churches, villages, neighborhoods, clubs, business organizations, and bureaucracies.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Most participants are not close kin, and participants come from a wide swathe of Turkana society, including multiple sub-territories.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew & Boyd 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Instead, the Turkana have cultural norms that discourage cowardice, norms that are enforced by peers who sanction violators in their local group.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew & Boyd 2011
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, class and regional variations are usually marked by linguistic differences (Labov 2001).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Labov 2001
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Mathew et al. (2013) note that humans routinely engage in a broader set of small-scale cooperative activities than do our primate relatives, and they argue that institutionalized third-party rewards and punishments often regulate such activities.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mathew et al. (2013) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the direct evidence for warfare in the Pleistocene is very limited, and doubts about war's importance before the Holocene persist (Guthrie 2005).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Guthrie 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These institutional differences among groups in turn facilitate CGS via any of the three processes identified in section 2.1.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.3. Institutions are group-level cultural traits
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural traits that affect military success are highly variable, and success in war tends to spread such traits by all three forms of CGS.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Economists routinely study all three mechanisms of CGS in competitive market systems.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Soltis et al. (1995) estimated group extinction rates from the differential group extinction and conversion of losers in a sample of societies in Papua New Guinea.They found that the estimated extinction rates would allow a group beneficial cultural trait to spread to most of a meta-population in 500-1,000 years.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Soltis et al. (1995)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, cultural differences between firms tend to persist, and differential expansion and contraction of firms is very active despite attempts to acquire the practices of more successful firms.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Absorption may be passive, in which defeated people adopt the identity of the dominant group through marriage and/or migration, or it can be coercive.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Soldiers from democratic nations also seem to fight more effectively than soldiers from non-democratic nations, even after controlling for wealth and other measures of power, perhaps because they more consistently report that they find their government's war policies legitimate (Reiter & Stam 2002).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiter & Stam 2002
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Humans use language to formulate and transmit social norms and to operate institutional systems of reward and punishment that stabilize these norms.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“New employees acquire the firm's culture through formal and informal socialization and incorporate the firm's culture as part of their social identity.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Democratic leaders seem to be better at picking the wars they fight, and they are more politically accountable when wars are lost.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Reiter & Stam 2002
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Well-run firms profit and survive, while poorly run firms with losses expire.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Economic CGS has a long history (Curtin 1984) and is very important in modern societies.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.2. Competition between economic organizations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Curtin 1984
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Tilly (1992) argues that sovereign territorial states out-competed both empires and feudal societies because they were better able to raise capital for military campaigns.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 5.1. Warfare
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tilly (1992)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In such systems, very little information is transmitted and syntactic complexity is quite limited (Hurford 2007).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hurford 2007
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Merlin Donald (1991) hypothesizes that Homo erectus and related Lower and Middle Pleistocene hominins were talented mimics, and that mimesis served as the evolutionary basis on which language could subsequently evolve.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Merlin Donald (1991)
plaindirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Linguistic variation is extremely important in maintaining social structure and influencing social judgments, as we saw in the case of children's early learning biases (sect.4.2).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“They also acquired basic social norms and integrated themselves into complex institutions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Donald
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Following the arguments for the efficiency of having innate, information-rich cognitive modules (Tooby & Cosmides 1992), having tight constraints on languages ought to make them easier and quicker to learn both for children and for people wanting to be able to speak multiple languages.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tooby & Cosmides 1992 source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such rituals today have powerful group-bonding effects and are therefore commonly incorporated into religious and secular patriotic celebrations (see sect.6.3).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A plausible answer is that culture was already tolerably complex before the capacity for language began to evolve.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Stone tool manufacture may go back three million years, and edge-wear evidence suggests that early stone tools were used to make a toolkit of perishable materials such as wood and hides.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The evolution of symbolic boundaries to communication will help protect group-level cultural variation from the homogenizing effects of migration, and thus favor the operation of CGS.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Theories differ mainly in the extent to which genes have responded to the coevolutionary pressure with language-specific cognitive structures.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It might be that language differences, like other symbolic differences, evolve to limit communication between groups (see sect.2.1).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“All the recent evolutionary theories of the capacity for language, beginning with Pinker and Bloom's (1990) pioneering article, are culture-led gene-culture coevolutionary hypotheses.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Pinker and Bloom's (1990)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is as if CGS favors not being able to understand those whom you likely cannot trust.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Language variation helps maintain between-group variation in other cultural domains, contributing to CGS, but it is also likely to be a product of it.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“They find much individual variation both in propensities to cooperate and to punish non-cooperators (Henrich et al. 2010a;Kurzban & Houser 2005).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henrich et al. 2010a
- Not checked yetcites Kurzban & Houser 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even at the scale of businesses and similar groups whose members speak the same language, group-specific jargon often distinguishes insiders from outsiders.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.1. Language
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Religions furnish group-boundary-defining symbols, moral justifications for institutions of social control, and rituals that celebrate and facilitate an organization's solidarity.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Elite groups do provide services in such societies, but they have a tendency to grow and become increasingly corrupt over time.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Turchin and Nefedov (2009)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We are inclined to think that evolution has built an element of genuine empathy and true altruism into our social psychology because monitoring and punishment are costly to punishers and to punishees, but many people obey norms mainly because deviance is punished.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.2. Crime, deviance, and punishment
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Institutions include mechanisms of selective punishment and reward that reduce small-scale variation in behavior.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“McNeill (1995) gives evidence that the ritual of close-order drill reshaped warfare by facilitating in-group cooperation and camaraderie, leading to the higher success of groups that perform these seemingly functionally meaningless rituals.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McNeill (1995)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Human organizations compete, often in highly organized ways, and the success and failure of groups in such competitions is often determined by institutional and other cultural differences.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is reflected by the observation that young children learn norms and act on them, but chimpanzee societies have, at best, rudimentary norms.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Ethnographic, historical, and experimental evidence suggest that synchronized dance and rhythmic ritual facilitate coordination and bonding of groups, and relieve low-level in-group conflict (Kirschner & Tomasello 2010;McNeill 1995;Rappaport 1999).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kirschner & Tomasello 2010
- Not checked yetcites McNeill 1995
- Not checked yetcites Rappaport 1999
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Theoretical arguments (Iannaccone 1992), supported by quantitative observations (Sosis & Bressler 2003;Sosis & Ruffle 2003), suggest that costly signals of group membership, such as hard-to-perform rituals and other sacrifices, help groups weed out free-riders and foster ingroup altruism.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Iannaccone 1992
- Not checked yetcites Sosis & Bressler 2003
- Not checked yetcites Sosis & Ruffle 2003
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The current direct evidence for culture-led gene-culture coevolution is only strong for genes that do not directly affect behavior, but evidence regarding behavioral traits is likely to improve greatly in the next decade.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Individual-level human decisions regarding the invention of new cultural variants, the spread of variants by diffusion, and the choices of group affiliation are likely to be strongly colored by moral intuitions like sympathy and patriotism.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These groups are often symbolically marked, have more or less formal criteria for membership, and possess distinctive social institutions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the same time, of course, religions (and other ideologies), when used to create in-group solidarity, sometimes create fear and hatred of out-groups (West 1941).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites West 1941
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A common characteristic of religions is sacred rules (Durkheim 1912;Rappaport 1999).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Durkheim 1912
- Not checked yetcites Rappaport 1999
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These often manifest as prosocial rules, including norms of fairness and norms of group defense, and also as symbolic systems that demarcate in-group membership.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Non-religious institutions also carry out rituals as part of their group culture, and they have similar effects.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 6.3. Religion and ritual
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most importantly, humans perfectly fit the nonhuman primate regression, suggesting that we do not need a special explanation for our proactive prosociality.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Participants experiencing a social environment that favors defection are dramatically less prosocial in subsequent one-shot anonymous interactions, but only if they rely on intuitive, heuristic processing”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peysakhovich & Rand 2015
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, the SHH accomplishes this without an appeal to group selection or intergroup conflict.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The good news is that evolutionary biologists have struggled fairly successfully with similar complexities in organic evolution (Endler 1986).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Endler 1986
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We do not see how any of the alternatives to CGS can easily account for the institutionalized cooperation that characterizes human societies.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, we will argue that the adoption of cooperative breeding suffices to explain the origin of human hyper-cooperation in early forager societies, as it resulted in increased prosociality and social transmission and favored the emergence of language.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Psychological and cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in nonhuman primates also arose when our hominin ancestors, but none of the other great apes, started to engage in cooperative breeding.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, cultural evolution and learning need not be linked to grouplevel selection, and genetic evolution to individual-level selection, as is done in the target article”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The total fitness of a population can be carved up in multiple ways and attributed to any number of traits, so long as fitness and trait values covary.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Price 1972
- Not checked yetcites Hamilton 1975
- Not checked yetcites Queller 1992
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, they have not shown that it is “essential” to human cooperation, or even that it has operated on any single trait.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, improving the group's welfare occurs as a side effect of selection maximizing individual payoffs, rather than as the cause of that selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We have pointed to excellent pioneering studies showing that a proper quantitative investigation of cultural evolution and gene-culture coevolution is possible (e.g., Bouckaert et al. 2012;Hout et al. 2001;Itan et al. 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 7. Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bouckaert et al. 2012
- Not checked yetcites Hout et al. 2001
- Not checked yetcites Itan et al. 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Although individual-level and multi-level fitness partitions are predictively equivalent, they are not causally so”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Birch & Okasha 2015
- Not checked yetcites Okasha 2015
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Like Richerson et al., we do not think that kin selection and reciprocity are sufficient to explain large-scale cooperation, but again, think they can explain where our cooperative motivations came from and how they were exposed to selection”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, we believe that the tribal social instincts and CGS were important very early in human evolution as our infant ancestors evolved the enhanced social-cognitive skills (theory of mind) that enabled them to “bargain and negotiate” their way through parent-offspring conflict.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Selection operates only on phenotypes, and phenotypes must develop before they are exposed to selection.
- Rests on an assumption: Everyone's first group, tribe, society, institution, ethnolinguistic unit, and culture is the mother-infant group.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, regardless of whether CGS is needed to explain the Holocene transition to large-scale societies, cooperative breeding is necessary to explain its operation in the first place.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Psychological and cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in nonhuman primates also arose when our hominin ancestors, but none of the other great apes, started to engage in cooperative breeding.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Extensive allomaternal care is a better explanation than the other source of human cooperation, male bonding and the resulting cooperative hunting and indirect reciprocity in food sharing, because in other male-bonded or cooperatively hunting species, we do not see similar prosocial tendencies, unless they also are cooperative breeders”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Burkart et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Burkart & van Schaik 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We think the earliest cultural norms evolved through mother-infant cooperation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Everyone's first group, tribe, society, institution, ethnolinguistic unit, and culture is the mother-infant group.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, group prosperity rests on in-group love (rather than out-group hate) that emerges also absent intergroup competition or comparison.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Because intergroup interactions often are mixed-motive rather than strictly zero-sum, groups often negotiate settlements that enable both cultures to thrive.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Indeed, intergroup competition strengthens in-group love rather than out-group hate (Halevy et al. 2008;2012), both among adults (De Dreu et al. 2014;Halevy et al. 2008) and young children”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Halevy et al. 2008
- Not checked yetcites De Dreu et al. 2014
- Not checked yetcites Buttelmann & Böhm 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While they make a solid case for the role of cultural group selection (CGS) in human evolution and history, we think it is the evolution of human cooperation that made the tribal social instincts and CGS possible in the first place, and that this occurred much earlier than the authors think.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, intergroup interactions often involve some corresponding interests and can and are settled peacefully through negotiated deals that allow both sides, and their respective cultures, to survive and prosper.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Accordingly, a more parsimonious and empirically more valid perspective may be that cultural group selection is the outcome of individuals and their groups seeking to survive and prosper, and who, therefore, create norms and cultural practices that sustain and promote biologically prepared tendencies for in-group love.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More generally, pronounced neural reactions to norm violations should enable groups to enforce social norms and punish deviant behavior, which, according Richerson et al., should further enhance intragroup cohesion and intergroup variation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The article also misapplies the F st statistic.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Agustin Fuentes and Marc Kissel
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Mrazek et al. (2013) argue that higher frequencies of short (S) allele in the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) persist in regions of the world prone to ecological threat because heightened threat sensitivity may be adaptive in such regions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mrazek et al. (2013)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the current proposal lacks connection to relevant evidence from the human evolutionary record and requires a better integration with contemporary evolutionary theory.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Agustin Fuentes and Marc Kissel
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We suggest that key aspects of CGS emerged previous to identifiable symbol-making and then coevolved, via niche construction and selection (alongside drift and gene flow), with that capacity to develop a baseline for the radical leaps in complexity in the last 20,000 years that Richerson et al. focus on.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Agustin Fuentes and Marc Kissel
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are influenced by multiple contextual and contingent (and linguistic) cultural variables and cannot be treated as independent material measures analogous to the number of alleles at a locus or inter-parietal breadth on a cranium.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Agustin Fuentes and Marc Kissel
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, in-group love can emerge both in the presence and absence of intergroup competition, and intergroup competition motivates in-group love more than out-group hate.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Communication and language.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By building on the intuitions and motivations supplied by our evolved kin psychology, cultural evolution can, for example, spread social norms for treating distant cousins more like genetic siblings, thereby fostering greater cooperation while inhibiting sex and marriage.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“they suggest that threat-driven genetic variance in the S allele may underlie differences in moral attitudes across cultures.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mrazek et al. (2013)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, it is a framework within which such an explanation can fruitfully be developed.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The position of the hyoid bone, which is a point of attachment for a tongue muscle, developed in Homo sapiens in a manner permitting highly precise and flexible tongue movements.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Modern humans have a larynx low in the throat, a position that allows the throat to serve as a resonating chamber capable of a great number of sounds (Relethford 2007).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Relethford 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Concurrently, nerves and muscles to the mouth, larynx, and tongue became more numerous to handle the complexities of speech (Jurmain et al. 1997).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jurmain et al. 1997
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural group selection is not an explanation of anything.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the production of consonants requires a short oral cavity, whereas our nearest primate relatives have much too long an oral cavity for this purpose.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The lack of need for brachiation freed the hand, arms, and shoulders of proto-humans to evolve for other purposes (Gintis et al. 2015).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gintis et al. 2015
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“few have explored it as a phenomenon that is modified by the ecological and historical contexts in which human groups are embedded.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, there is overwhelming evidence for this process as central to the constitution of Homo sapiens”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Humans are unique in possessing a torso musculature optimized for the powerful and accurate throwing of projectile weapons.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first hominids that had skeletal structures supporting this laryngeal placement were the Homo heidelbergensis, who lived from 800,000 to 100,000 years ago.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Regions in the motor cortex expanded in early humans to facilitate speech production.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jurmain et al. 1997
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The more powerful such evolved mechanisms are, the more effectively culture can potentially harness and manipulate them to generate greater phenotypic variation across groups, thereby fueling cultural group selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“some argue, often in opposition to cultural evolutionary accounts, that such life history switches account for between-group variation in prosociality and the growth of moralizing religions (Baumard et al. 2015).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baumard et al. 2015
hedgeddirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Intergroup competition can favor those social norms which maximize the effectiveness of direct reciprocity under particular conditions, and this may help explain why the importance of direct reciprocity varies so dramatically among societies (Fiske 1992).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fiske 1992
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The spread of normative monogamous marriage provides an example of an institution that harnesses various evolved mechanisms to increase paternal investment, household relatedness, and infant/child survival while reducing male-male competition (Henrich et al. 2012b).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henrich et al. 2012b
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, environmental cues may evoke evolved psychological responses that influence human sociality.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Herbert Gintis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These factors eventually became barriers to their further development and prevented efficient cooperation”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Olsson & Paik 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Culture adoption elasticity is highly dependent on the geographical, historical, and intragroup factors and on development of competing cultures, but the direction of influence is not straightforward (Acemoglu et al. 2005).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Acemoglu et al. 2005
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genetic diversity has greater effects on comparative development than Richerson et al. admit.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“antimonopoly law is often a tool of adjustment of government politics (Armentano 1986) or a product of lobby groups' pressure.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Armentano 1986
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“competitive forces do shape aspects of human-animal interactions that are precursors to affection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Genetic make-up can influence aspects of cultural evolution, which along with resource accessibility may in turn give advantage to bearers of certain genetic markers in a gene-culture coevolutionary process”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Havlícěk & Roberts 2013
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“An example of our point consists in thriving Neolithic agricultural societies, which formed large and successful autocratic cultures, but in which high power inequality and rent-seeking emerged.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Harold Herzog
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Olsson & Paik 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Religion often has the characteristics of a trait designed for group promotion and cohesion (e.g., costly rituals, apostasy punishment, and clear between-group demarcation) making it a strong candidate for spread through intergroup competition.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
boostedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, individuals from different villages did not share a common cultural norm of cooperation despite their common ethnicity, and their behaviour varied in response to the demographic and ecological features of their environment.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The adaptationist approach of George Williams (1966) revolutionized evolutionary biology.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams (1966)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Cognitive niche hypotheses propose mechanisms that extract information from the environment and make appropriate inferences (Tooby & DeVore 1987).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tooby & DeVore 1987
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While CGS models invoke cultural transmission to explain the evolution of large-scale cooperation, empirical data suggest that cultural transmission is less likely as behaviour gets more cooperative and cooperation is less likely in large populations.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In conclusion, if individuals do not copy cooperative behaviour, the behavioural variation between groups is unstable due to the demographic changes that groups experience over time, and behaviour is more selfish in larger populations, then we must question the existence of stably transmitted cultural norms of cooperation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Not all traits are adaptations: some are merely incidental by-products of adaptations and need no special adaptive explanation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Its red color when oxygenated is a by-product of its chemistry and needs no adaptive explanation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Williams had a further insight: Selection is most efficient at the lowest, most faithfully replicating levels in the hierarchy of life.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Evoked culture hypotheses propose facultative cognitive mechanisms that modulate behavior based on available information (Tooby & Cosmides 1992).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tooby & Cosmides 1992 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, as we and others have argued elsewhere, high levels of variation in cooperative behaviour are also found within ethnic groups (Lamba & Mace 2011;2012;Nettle et al. 2011), suggesting that variation attributed to different cultural norms could in fact reflect individual adaptations to different environments.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lamba & Mace 2011;2012
- Not checked yetcites Nettle et al. 2011
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Political systems have to be properties of the group rather than the individual, so group selection should be in operation in these cases (Currie & Mace 2009;Currie et al 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Currie & Mace 2009
- Not checked yetcites Currie et al 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Genes reproduce more faithfully than individuals, who reproduce more faithfully than groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, adaptions generally arise in the service of transmitting the genes that build them, not in the service of perpetuating the groups where individuals carrying those genes reside.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Theories of cultural group selection, gene-culture coevolution, and dual inheritance are now at least 30 years old (e.g., Boyd & Richerson 1985).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 1985
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“To the extent that our evolved social psychology is richly articulated, features of this evoked culture can act as further inputs to other facultative mechanisms and evoke further novel cultural features (Tooby & Cosmides 1992).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Tooby & Cosmides 1992 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although police forces and the rule of law did not exist in Paleolithic society, our evolved psychology of personal aggression can be exploited by these institutions to evoke cultures that never existed before.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Group selection should only be invoked with clear evidence of group-level adaptation, not merely group-level phenomena, an error repeatedly made by the target article.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More critically, no evidence is offered that these traits arise from cultural group selection; we argue that apparent group-level effects are by-products arising from individual-level benefits when this alternative is taken seriously.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This was surely the case for punishment, as the utility of using coercive power to get one's way would have ancestrally varied between people (e.g., aggression pays more for the strong; Sell et al. 2009) and between ecologies (e.g., aggression pays more when there are gains it can recruit; Krasnow et al. 2012).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sell et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Krasnow et al. 2012
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Blood contains adaptations for the transport of oxygen and carbon dioxide; its transport properties were crafted by natural selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > The sketch is blank: No evidence for an explanatory role for cultural group selection
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams (1966)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Migration and imitation are more likely to work toward equilibrium selection: We can expect people to join the societies, or adopt the institutions, that give them a better deal.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Types 2 and 3 of CGS must, at least occasionally, create group-level selection pressures that are fully aligned with individual-level selection pressures, and thus undistinguishable from them (unless we assume that human decision-making is so maladaptive as to decreases individual fitness systematically).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Type 2 CGS is migration, when individuals vote with their feet to join the societies that offer them the best deal (Boyd & Richerson 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural norms vary, change, and influence cooperation; but that is not group selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Finally, in the third form of CGS (selective imitation) preferential cooperation must also be dropped, as is obvious from Richerson et al.'s logic and examples.Group members are defined by their common adoption of some institutional innovationthat is all:”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two of these lack the key features associated with group selection: they do not present us with group-level selection pressures counteracting individual-level ones, need not produce behavioral altruism, and do not require competition between groups whose members cooperate preferentially with one another.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While language is a classic frequency-dependent group trait, the exact design of particular languages is not generally considered to confer any particular benefit over any other, therefore it is unlikely that CGS is operating on languages.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Shakti Lamba
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural diffusion need involve no demographic change, and no change in the composition of coalitions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Here, we have sheer equilibrium selection with no differential growth, and no competition between coalitions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, to be preferred as a partner requires striving to get resources and a reputation for sharing them.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“West-Eberhard's core insight was that social selection occurs for competition over resources other than matings.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites West-Eberhard 1979;1983
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Social selection for competition opens up a whole world of important explanations, but partner choice is more important for explaining cooperation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Science needs lumpers as well as splitters; but to test three very different hypotheses as if they were one, is to test only their weakest common denominator.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CGS is not, however, the only plausible explanation for extreme human prosociality, and it does little to explain how the process gets going.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The functional equivalent for CGS would be a group-level, cultural system with boundaries resistant to the introduction of competing cultural traits.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most desirable relationship partners pair with each other, and this selective association gives them a selective advantage.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The benefits experienced by prosocial individuals, and the benefits of preferring such individuals as partners or group members, shape social traits as extreme and costly as a peacock's tail.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This requires no kin selection, reciprocity, group selection, or CGS, although all of those phenomena are also involved in selecting for prosocial traits.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After a tipping point was reached, however, investments in careful partner choice and traits that make one a preferred partner could coevolve in a possibly runaway process that may have been crucial in making culture possible (Nesse 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nesse 2010
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Kinship terminologies, with their algebraic-like structure (Leaf & Read 2012;Read 1984;2012;Read et al. 2014) are symbolic, computational systems with an underlying, generative logic and no more emergent from behavior than is arithmetic (contra Smaldino 2014)hence, their evolutionary change is at the global level of organization and not the population level of individual traits (see Lane et al. 2”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Leaf & Read 2012
- Not checked yetcites Read 1984;2012
- Not checked yetcites Read et al. 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The F ST statistic belongs to a broad family of “fixation indices”statistics developed by population geneticists to study genetic differentiation between populations (Holsinger & Weir 2009).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holsinger & Weir 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The system of sealing partners expresses the cultural meaning of being a seal hunter and makes the actions of others, as hunters, predictable, hence forming the basis for cooperation among the sealing partners.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Olivier Morin
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Discontinuities do exist (typically associated with geographic obstacles), but many apparent genetic barriers have proven to be artefacts of heterogeneous spatial sampling (Handley et al. 2007).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Handley et al. 2007
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the group level, they found significant cultural differentiation, with geography predicting differentiation in ornaments but not pottery.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shennan et al. 2015
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This means that geographically close individuals/tales from neighbouring groups tend to be more similar than is suggested by the relatively large average cultural Φ ST , thereby limiting the scope for cultural group selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Intriguingly, however, cultural Φ ST was found to be an order of magnitude smaller than genetic Φ ST for the same groups, contra Bell et al.'s (2009) hypothesis that human groups generally show a higher degree of cultural differentiation than genetic differentiation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Brown et al. 2014
- Not checked yetcites Bell et al. 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the level of individual artefacts, cultural affiliation was an independent predictor of pottery variation, while geography was not; but both cultural affiliation and geography were independent predictors of ornament variation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shennan et al. 2015
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, this cooperative feature of Spanish Catholic culture was resisted by many of the conquered peoples, even while cultural traits irrelevant to differential success (e.g., the names of deities) were adopted.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Natural selection chooses those activities that correlate either with Phylogenetically Important Events (PIE) that ultimately enhance fitness or ontogenetic proxies of these PIEs (Baum 2012).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baum 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While CGS may be a factor, we can also appeal to other factors not accounted for by CGS, including the direct appeal of that trait or pure chance.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To estimate an activity's effect on an individual's or a group's fitness, we need to weigh the long-term effects of the sum of local acts against the long-term effect of the behavioral pattern as a whole.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“On the contrary, it has long been recognized that the spread of religion in the face of differential success of cultural groups involves syncretism, defined as “a type of acceptance characterized by the conscious adaptation of an alien form or idea in terms of some indigenous counterpart” instead of the replacement of the indigenous trait by the foreign one (Madsen 1967, p. 369).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Madsen 1967
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The key to understanding cooperation lies in understanding that the effect of an extended behavioral pattern does not equaland might even be opposite tothe added effects of its parts.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although, for instance, Mayan communities adopted the practice of saint worship from the conquering Spanish, Mayan saint worship tends to “evince a more profound parochialism than did saint worship in 16th-century Spain.Cosmologically, Maya saints have become decidedly local personages relatively independent of the remote … God” (Watanabe 1990, p. 137).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Watanabe 1990
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, cultural groups in competitive situations adopt only some features of competing groups, or more frequently, new hybrid cultural traits emerge through the fusion of features from multiple groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Cultural differentiation does not entail grouplevel structure: The case for geographically explicit analysis
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In different environmental situations, natural selection occurring within groups and between groups may have different relative strengths.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Even if cooperation, defined as “working together toward a shared aim” (Wehmeier and Hornby 2000), was selected because it commonly enhanced the individual's long-term fitness, it neither follows that cooperation enhances all cooperators' fitness, nor that all acts that we classify as parts of cooperative behavior do so.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wehmeier and Hornby 2000
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“CGS leads to group-functional culture by selecting on cultural variation (Boyd & Richerson 2010), but such selection presupposes that group-functional equilibria exist already, suggesting that other processes, including within-group dynamics, contribute to the emergence of groupfunctional culture.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boyd & Richerson 2010
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If, however, enough group members cooperate, those activities lead to fitness-enhancing PIEs or their proxies.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Considering the role of coercive rule-makers offers an alternative explanation not only for the origin of group-functional culture, but also for its maintenance, because powerful rule-makers should continue to enforce group-functional rules as long as the rules satisfy their own perceived self-interest.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first emerges when asymmetries in power or influence allow parties to create and impose rules that satisfy their own interests.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An alternative form of this hypothesis develops when power is more evenly distributed.In these cases, coordinated groups of individuals can consensually create, modify, and enforce rules that control defection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In most instances, however, the whole group benefits, which means that those who contributed at their own immediate cost often do indeed benefit in the long run.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We would first like to note that behavioral imitation, which the authors focus on, is not the only form of social learning that could reduce intergroup cultural variation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We did choose questions (see the appendix at the end of the target article) that seem intuitively to be cultural and related to norms and institutions.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but we cannot be certain about the extent to which the traits represent culturally heritable variation as opposed to variation influenced by direct environmental effects or genetic variation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Interestingly, this may be because preschoolers are more sensitive to violations of commonly held cultural knowledge (Stephens & Koenig 2015;Koenig & Stephens 2014).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stephens & Koenig 2015
- Not checked yetcites Koenig & Stephens 2014
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This is not to say that children are always critical in the face of message conflicts: Preschoolers have been found to trust a deceptive adult who provides inaccurate information about an object's location (Jaswal 2010;Jaswal et al. 2010).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jaswal 2010
- Not checked yetcites Jaswal et al. 2010
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The individual-level data that we used in section 4.1 to estimate F ST between various cultural units provide a large number of responses collected from large samples”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Along these lines, we would argue that the selective learner's ability to critically evaluate cultural information on the basis of its accuracy, support, and coherence contributes to CGS in two main ways.First, as previously described, the social learner can reduce intergroup cultural variation by rationally evaluating outgroup cultural information and adopting that which is deemed to be not only”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Carsta Simon
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Differences in other cultural traits, such as subsistence strategy and bride wealth, are likely also important.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The adaptive evolution of an altruistic trait therefore must be due to group-level selection (although not necessarily CGS).”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, broader cultural differences between groups, or measurements across a range of cultural traits, may approximate the relevant suite of differences resulting in a cultural expansion due to group selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These categories are in some sense ad hoc, in that we could classify these same individuals into any number of other categories/groups and produce a different F ST value.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Every cultural or genetic trait can have its own evolutionary trajectory, and this trajectory can be decomposed using the Price equation (Price 1970) into change due to individual-level and group-level effects.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Price 1970
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further, (2) we note that there is no reason why we would need to limit cultural F ST calculations to beliefs or behaviors related to altruism or cooperation.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These boundaries are never completely impermeable.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Many human groups have formal criteria for membership and are often symbolically marked by language, dialect, and other differences.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the data we used were obtained from opinion surveys which sampled units that the survey formulators considered to be meaningful social units.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For example, the military expansion of the Nuer at the expense of the Dinka (Kelly 1985) is presumably not just due to differences in political organization.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kelly 1985
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The main thing all three have in common is that they are driven by variation among groups.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R4. Little unites the three forms of CGS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clinal geographic structure is a kind of group structure, as is nominal group identification.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Ross & Atkinson's finding that geographic variation explains more variation in folktales than currently observed”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R3. Measuring cultural variation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ross & Atkinson
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Morin is quite right that one form of CGS we describe, the differential growth, proliferation, and extinction of cultural groups, is a form of natural selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R4. Little unites the three forms of CGS
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The other two, differential imitation and differential migration, are selective decision-making processes, not natural selection.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > R4. Little unites the three forms of CGS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The most ancient human groups are the ethnolinguistic tribes into which simpler societies are generally divided.
“The most ancient groups are the ethnolinguistic tribes into which simpler societies are generally divided.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The debate about the importance of CGS relative to competing explanations for human cooperation has not been fully engaged.
“Heretofore, the debate about the importance of CGS relative to competing explanations for human cooperation has not been fully engaged.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Stone tool manufacture may go back three million years, and edge-wear evidence suggests that early stone tools were used to make a toolkit of perishable materials such as wood and hides.
“Stone tool manufacture may go back three million years, and edge-wear evidence suggests that early stone tools were used to make a toolkit of perishable materials such as wood and hides.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Psychological and cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in nonhuman primates also arose when our hominin ancestors, but none of the other great apes, started to engage in cooperative breeding.
“It is thus most parsimonious to assume that such psychological and cognitive consequences also arose when our hominin ancestors, but none of the other great apes, started to engage in cooperative breeding”
The paper relies on this without support.
Selection operates only on phenotypes, and phenotypes must develop before they are exposed to selection.
“Because selection operates only on phenotypes, and phenotypes must develop before they are exposed to selection, we are skeptical of models of the evolution of cooperation that attribute fitness benefits to adults only.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Everyone's first group, tribe, society, institution, ethnolinguistic unit, and culture is the mother-infant group.
“From the perspective of attachment theoryand infantseveryone's first group, tribe, society, institution, ethnolinguistic unit, and culture is the mother-infant group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The debate on CGS lacks sufficient consideration of CGS's potential moderators.
“the debate lacks sufficient consideration of CGS's potential moderators.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Substantive explanations of human evolution must be located within culture-led gene-culture coevolution.
“Culture-led gene-culture coevolution is a framework within which substantive explanations of human evolution must be located.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Cultural group selection models assume that individuals copy the behaviour of others and acquire cooperative strategies via social learning.
“A central assumption of CGS models is that individuals copy the behaviour of others and acquire cooperative strategies via social learning.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Cultural difference is one of the foundational assumptions of anthropology.
“Cultural difference is one of the foundational assumptions of anthropology, so we should expect to find it.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Netsilik did not trust a hunter to be altruistic or to voluntarily cooperate, and created an organizational system that depended on neither.
“In their social contract, the Netsilik did not trust a hunter to be altruistic or to voluntarily cooperate, and they instead created an organizational system that depended on neither of these.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Individual Netsilik hunters would likely not survive without averaging hunting risks over a pool of hunters.
“Cheating, in the sense of opting out of acting in accordance with being a sealing partner, was not a viable option in a context in which individual hunters would likely not survive without averaging hunting risks over a pool of hunters.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Information on variation within societies is very scanty compared to estimates of between-society variation.
“Unfortunately, information on variation within societies is very scanty compared to estimates of between-society variation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Competition between the political units known as "countries" is seldom the key level at which selection takes place.
“It is also undoubtedly the case that competition between the political units known as "countries" is seldom the key level at which selection takes place.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A given classification of individuals into groups can be assumed for the purpose of calculating the scope for group selection on a focal cultural trait.
“We simply illustrate that, if we assume a given classification of individuals into groups, we can calculate the scope for group selection to act on the focal cultural trait as a function of this classification.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many human groups have formal criteria for membership and are often symbolically marked by language, dialect, and other differences.
“It is true that many human groups have formal criteria for membership and are often symbolically marked by language, dialect, and other differences.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These informational shielding properties of MBs connect with debates regarding units of selection in evolutionary theory, in that only organismic phenotypes—and sometimes groups of organisms (Laland et al., 2015; Richerson et al., 2016)—are “visible” to natural selection with respect to phylogeny.”
From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Richerson et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Hypotheses for the evolution of increased cooperation could therefore in theory contribute to explaining why docility evolved (e.g., Henrich, 2016; Richerson et al., 2016).”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Richerson et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Gene-culture coevolution would then include selection in favor of an increasingly parochial-altruistic psychology: tendencies for docility and conformity would be favored because individuals with those characteristics would readily acquire group norms (Richerson et al., 2016).”
From Hypotheses for the Evolution of Reduced Reactive Aggression in the Context of Human Self-Domestication (2019) · cites this paper as Richerson et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > 4.1. Quantitative evidence of cultural differences between groups
“Among small political or ethnic groups, nations, and religious majorities, we consistently report F ST values greater than 0.01, with some traits showing F ST scores above 0.6.”
§ Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence > Data description
“Likely scenario for peace or war with Israel Muslims (748), Christians (92) 1 0.009”
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.
Loasby, B. J., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1983) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232409 · Cited by 21,426
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Ostrom, E. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807763 · Cited by 20,653
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Elinor Ostrom, B. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 19,100
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
チャールス, ダ., & 茂穂, 田. (1907) · Tokyo Jinrui Gakkai zasshi · doi:10.1537/ase1887.22.495 · Cited by 10,909
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
(1976) · Cited by 10,423
The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1369 · Cited by 8,517
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Tilly, 1992, Coercion, capital and European states
- Hurford, 2011, The origins of grammar: Language in the light of evolution II
- Labov, 2001, Principles of linguistic change: Social factors, vol. 29
- Shariff, 2009, Evolution, culture, and the human brain, 119
- Turchin, 2003, Historical dynamics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14001356 · Cited by 934
The Origins and Psychology of Human Cooperation
Henrich, J., & Muthukrishna, M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-081920-042106 · Cited by 457
Cultural Change: The How and the Why
Varnum, M. E. W., & Grossmann, I. (2017) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617699971 · Cited by 294
Brain Plasticity and Human Evolution
Sherwood, C. C., & Gómez-Robles, A. (2017) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100009 · Cited by 170
Revenge: a multilevel review and synthesis
Jackson, J. C., Choi, V. K., & Gelfand, M. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103305 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., Mathew, S., Newton, E. K., Naar, N., Newson, L., Ross, C., Smaldino, P. E., Waring, T. M., & Zefferman, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- University of Utah (US)
- Boise State University (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Dominican University of California (US)
- Santa Fe Institute (US)
- University of Maine (US)
- National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-10-28
- Volume
- 39
- Pages
- e30-e30
- ISSN
- 0140-525X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-1825
- OpenAlex
- W2155058526
- Cited by
- 639
- References
- 473
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 108.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (CAREER)
- National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- cultural group selection, human cooperation, cultural transmission, institutions, norms, group competition, reciprocity, kin selection, multilevel selection, non-relatives
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Altruism, Competitive Behavior, Cooperative Behavior, Cultural Evolution, Biological Evolution, Group Processes, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Selection, Genetic, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review