Cited by 337Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Typologies of loneliness, living alone and social isolation, and their associations with physical and mental health

Open access
SMITH, KIMBERLEY J., VICTOR, CHRISTINA·2019·Ageing and Society

Abstract

Abstract The relationship between living alone, loneliness and social isolation, and how they are associated with health remain contentious. We sought to explore typologies based on shared experiences of loneliness, social isolation and living alone using Latent Class Analysis and determine how these groups may differ in terms of their physical and mental health. We used Wave 7 of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (N = 7,032; mean age = 67.3) and responses to the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) loneliness scale, household composition, participation in social/societal activities plus frequency of contact with friends, family and relatives for the Latent Class Analysis. The optimal number of groups was identified using model-fit criteria. The socio-demographic characteristics of groups and health outcomes were explored using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. We identified a six-cluster typology: Group 1, no loneliness or isolation; Group 2, moderate loneliness; Group 3, living alone; Group 4, moderate isolation; Group 5, moderate loneliness, living alone; and Group 6, high loneliness, moderate isolation (with high likelihood of living alone). Groups experiencing loneliness and/or isolation were more likely to report poorer physical and mental health even after adjusting for socio-demographic confounders, this was particularly notable for Group 6. Our results indicate that different typologies of living alone, loneliness and isolation can be identified using data-driven techniques, and can be differentiated by the number and severity of issues they experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0144686x18000132

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1.  Kimberley J. Smith and Christina Victor https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000132 Published online by Cambridge University Press
  2.  Kimberley J. Smith and Christina Victor https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000132 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SMITH, K. J., & VICTOR, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
SMITH, KIMBERLEY J.
Venue
Ageing and Society
Published
2018-04-10
Volume
39
Issue
8
Pages
1709-1730
ISSN
  • 0144-686X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-1779
OpenAlex
W2785718018
Cited by
337
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 3
FWCI
26.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ageing and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
loneliness, social isolation, living alone, typology, older adults, physical health, mental health, social networks, household composition, English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review