The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explicit Instruction and Input Processing
Abstract
In this paper we describe an experiment in explicit instruction that compares traditional form-focused instruction and what we call processing instruction. Traditional instruction involves explanation and output practice of a grammatical point. Processing instruction involves explanation and practice/experience processing input data, taking learner strategies in input processing as the starting point for determining what explicit instruction should look like. Pretest and posttest measures involving both a sentence-level interpretation (comprehension) task and a sentence-level production task were submitted to an analysis of variance. Results reveal significant gains in both comprehension and production for subjects who experienced processing instruction. For those experiencing traditional instruction, significant gains were made in production only.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435 · cited 1×
“While not a great deal is known about input processing, there is some discussion in the literature about how learners process input (e.g., Chaudron, 1985; Gass, 1988; Hulstijn, 1989; Klein, 1986; Schmidt, 1990; VanPatten, 1990).”
BackgroundDoes Second Language Instruction Make a Difference? A Review of Research
Long, M. H. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586253 · Cited by 573
Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Second Language Fluency
Schmidt, R. (1992) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100011189 · Cited by 458
MCLAUGHLIN, B. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.113 · Cited by 303
Ellis, R. (1989) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100008159 · Cited by 190
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- 10.1093/applin/7.3.239 · DOI
- Cadierno T. (1992). Explicit instruction in grammar: A comparison of input based and output based instruction in second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
- Gass, 1982, On TESOL '81, 129
- VanPatten, 1984, Learners' comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy, Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb01083.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/applin/9.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1129947 · DOI
- 10.1017/S027226310000512X · DOI
- Peters, 1985, The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, 1029
- Krashen, 1982, Principles and practice in second language acquisition
- Lee, 1987, Language and language use: Studies in Spanish, 221
- LoCoco, 1987, Foreign language learning: A research perspective, 119
- 10.2307/3587113 · DOI · Paper page
- Bever, 1970, Cognition and the development of language, 279
- 10.1093/applin/9.2.198 · DOI · Paper page
- Ellis, 1990, Instructed second language acquisition
- 10.2307/3585535 · DOI · Paper page
- Hulstijn, 1989, Interlingual processing, 49
- 10.1017/CBO9780511815058 · DOI
- Knorre, 1985, Puntos de partida
- 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05257.x · DOI
- McLaughlin, 1987, Theories of second language acquisition
- Savignon, 1983, Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice
- 10.1017/S0272263100011931 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0272263100008408 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0272263100009177 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1632/adfl.23.3.23 · DOI
- VanPatten, Festschrift for Tracy David Terrell
- VanPatten, Second language acquisition as input processing: A role for instruction, The Modern Language Journal
- VanPatten, 1992, ¿Sabias que…?
- 10.1017/CBO9781139524544.013 · DOI
- 10.1075/lald.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Pienemann, 1987, First and second language acquisition processes, 143
Cited by
Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136 · Cited by 2,569
A Framework for the Implementation of Task-based Instruction
SKEHAN, P. (1996) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/17.1.38 · Cited by 1,547
Chaos/Complexity Science and Second Language Acquisition
LARSEN-FREEMAN, D. (1997) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/18.2.141 · Cited by 1,484
Introduction: Investigating Form‐Focused Instruction
Ellis, R. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x · Cited by 826
Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T.
- Venue
- Studies in Second Language Acquisition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-243
- ISSN
- 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1545
- OpenAlex
- W2136737367
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 55.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
