Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 636

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explicit Instruction and Input Processing

VanPatten, Bill, Cadierno, Teresa·1993·Studies in Second Language Acquisition
DOI 10.1017/s0272263100011979
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper we describe an experiment in explicit instruction that compares traditional form-focused instruction and what we call processing instruction. Traditional instruction involves explanation and output practice of a grammatical point. Processing instruction involves explanation and practice/experience processing input data, taking learner strategies in input processing as the starting point for determining what explicit instruction should look like. Pretest and posttest measures involving both a sentence-level interpretation (comprehension) task and a sentence-level production task were submitted to an analysis of variance. Results reveal significant gains in both comprehension and production for subjects who experienced processing instruction. For those experiencing traditional instruction, significant gains were made in production only.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0272263100011979

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1093/applin/7.3.239 · DOI
  2. Cadierno T. (1992). Explicit instruction in grammar: A comparison of input based and output based instruction in second language acquisition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
  3. Gass, 1982, On TESOL '81, 129
  4. VanPatten, 1984, Learners' comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy, Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57
  5. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb01083.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1093/applin/9.1.1 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.2307/1129947 · DOI
  8. 10.1017/S027226310000512X · DOI
  9. Peters, 1985, The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, 1029
  10. Krashen, 1982, Principles and practice in second language acquisition
  11. Lee, 1987, Language and language use: Studies in Spanish, 221
  12. LoCoco, 1987, Foreign language learning: A research perspective, 119
  13. 10.2307/3587113 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bever, 1970, Cognition and the development of language, 279
  15. 10.1093/applin/9.2.198 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ellis, 1990, Instructed second language acquisition
  17. 10.2307/3585535 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hulstijn, 1989, Interlingual processing, 49
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511815058 · DOI
  20. Knorre, 1985, Puntos de partida
  21. 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05257.x · DOI
  22. McLaughlin, 1987, Theories of second language acquisition
  23. Savignon, 1983, Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice
  24. 10.1017/S0272263100011931 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1017/S0272263100008408 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/S0272263100009177 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1632/adfl.23.3.23 · DOI
  28. VanPatten, Festschrift for Tracy David Terrell
  29. VanPatten, Second language acquisition as input processing: A role for instruction, The Modern Language Journal
  30. VanPatten, 1992, ¿Sabias que…?
  31. 10.1017/CBO9781139524544.013 · DOI
  32. 10.1075/lald.1 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Pienemann, 1987, First and second language acquisition processes, 143

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T.
Venue
Studies in Second Language Acquisition
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1993-06
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
225-243
ISSN
  • 0272-2631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1545
DOI
10.1017/s0272263100011979
OpenAlex
W2136737367
Cited by
636
References
5
FWCI
55.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 5638 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.