Cited by 112Frailty in Older AdultsChronic Disease Management StrategiesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 166 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening for Frailty in Canada’s Health Care System: A Time for Action

Open access

Abstract

RÉSUMÉ Avec le vieillissement de la population canadienne, la fragilité – avec son risque accru du déclin fonctionnel, la détérioration de la santé, et le décès – devient de plus en plus répandue. La physiologie de la fragilité reflète son origine parmi organes et systèmes multiples. Environ un quart des Canadiens qui sont âgés de plus de 65 sont fragiles, augmentant à plus de la moitié de ceux âgés de plus de 85. Notre système de soins de santé est organisé pour gérer les systèmes mono-organes, ce qui nuit à notre capacité à traiter efficacement les personnes atteintes de troubles multiples et des limitations fonctionnelles. Pour faire face à la fragilité, il faut reconnaître quand elle se produit, accroître la sensibilisation à son importance, développer des modèles holistiques pour ses soins, et générer des meilleures preuves pour son traitement. La reconnaissance de la façon dont la fragilité impacte la durée de vie permettrait l’intégration des objectifs en matière de soins dans les options de traitement. Les différents organisations de soins responsables variées dans le système de soins de santé canadien nécessiteront des stratégies et outils différentes pour évaluer la fragilité. Les changements dans la politique sera essentiels, étant donné la portée et la complexité des défis que pose la fragilité au système de soins de santé comme cela est organisé actuellement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0714980816000301

Cites

166 of 166 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 2013, Future care for Canadian seniors—Why it matters
  2. Hirdes, 2010, interRAI contact assessment (CA) form and user’s manual: A screening level assessment for emergency department and intake from community/hospital
  3. 2011, A focus on seniors and aging
  4. 2011, Living arrangements of seniors: Families, households and marital status. Structural type of dwelling and collectives, 2011 census of population
  5. 2009, Canada’s aging population: Seizing the opportunity
  6. McNally, 2014, Frailty in ageing: Biological, clinical and social implications, 174
  7. Dickson, 2012, Evidence-informed change management in Canadian healthcare organizations
  8. Sinha, 2012, Portrait of caregivers, 2012
  9. Strain, 2015, Designated Assisted Living (DAL) and long-term care in Alberta: Selected highlights from the Alberta Continuing Care Epidemiological Studies (ACCES)
  10. 2001, 2001 Census of Canada.
  11. Heyland, 2015, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and Canadian Researchers at the End of Life Network, Critical Care Medicine, 41, 1911
  12. Doupe, 2006, Using administrative data to develop indicators of quality care in personal care homes

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 112

Metadata

Authors
Muscedere, J., Andrew, M. K., Bagshaw, S. M., Estabrooks, C., Hogan, D., Holroyd-Leduc, J., Howlett, S., Lahey, W., Maxwell, C., McNally, M., Moorhouse, P., Rockwood, K., Rolfson, D., Sinha, S., Tholl, B., & for the Canadian Frailty Network (CFN)
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • HealthCareCAN (CA)
Corresponding author
Muscedere, John
Venue
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement
Published
2016-05-23
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
281-297
ISSN
  • 0714-9808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1710-1107
OpenAlex
W2406639032
Cited by
112
References
167
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
frailty, frailty screening, Canadian health care system, population aging, functional decline, multimorbidity, holistic care, health policy, health care organization, older adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada, Critical Care, Delivery of Health Care, Health Policy, Health Status, Hospitalization, Humans, Mass Screening, Nursing Homes, Primary Health Care, Frail Elderly, Assisted Living Facilities, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review