Cited by 249Frailty in Older AdultsGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

How should we grade frailty in nursing home patients?

Rockwood, Kenneth, Abeysundera, Melanie Joan, Mitnitski, Arnold·2007·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objectives To compare 3 methods of describing the frailty of older adults in nursing homes.Design Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study.Setting Canadian long-term care institutions.Participants Institutionalized older adults in the second clinical examination cohort of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA-2; n = 728).Measures Frailty was measured using the Cardiovascular Health Survey definition (Frail-CHS); the CSHA- Clinical Frailty Scale (CSHA-CFS) and a frailty index (FI).Results The sample was very elderly (87.7 +/- 6.7 years), disabled (83%), and showed a high level of mobility impairment (83%). Each frailty measure correlated moderately well with each other (0.61-0.71) and with a disability measure (-0.45 to -0.53) but only weakly with age (0.13-0.19). By each measure, frailty was significantly associated (P < .01) with an increased risk of mortality, disability and cognitive decline. In a model that included both the frailty-CHS definition and the Frailty Index only the latter was associated with a higher risk of mortality (P < .01 for FI, P = .18 for Frail-CHS) and decline in the 3MS (P < .01 for FI, P = .20 for the Frail-CHS definition). Both measures were significantly associated with new onset disability (P < .01). Similar results were found when both the CSHA-CFS and Frailty Index were included in the models. Random combinations of 15 variables used to make up alternate 5-item Frail-CHS definitions showed that any stratification based on 5 variables allowed tertiles of risk to be discriminated.Conclusions Frailty is a robust concept and however defined, elderly people who are frail have worse outcomes than those who are not frail. The 3 measures showed varying ability to express grades of frailty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.07.012

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We selected variables at random (boot-strapping) from a list of eligible variables to make up the Frailty Index and have again shown that the results are insensitive to the precise composition of the index.

    “Here, as in some earlier studies, [7,19,31] we have selected variables at random (boot-strapping) from a list of eligible variables to make up the Frailty Index and have again shown that the results are insensitive to the precise composition of the index.”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rockwood, K., Abeysundera, M. J., & Mitnitski, A.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Rockwood, Kenneth
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-11
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
595-603
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078487625
Cited by
249
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
frailty, nursing home residents, older adults, frailty assessment, frailty index, Clinical Frailty Scale, mortality risk, disability, cognitive decline, long-term care, mobility impairment
MeSH terms
Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Prospective Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Survival Analysis, Frail Elderly, Mobility Limitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review