Mood and neural responses to social rejection do not seem to be altered in resilient adolescents with a history of adversity
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Childhood adversity (CA) increases the risk of subsequent mental health problems. Adolescent social support (from family and/or friends) reduces the risk of mental health problems after CA. However, the mechanisms of this effect remain unclear, and we speculate that they are manifested on neurodevelopmental levels. Therefore, we investigated whether family and/or friendship support at ages 14 and 17 function as intermediate variables for the relationship between CA before age 11 and affective or neural responses to social rejection feedback at age 18. We studied 55 adolescents with normative mental health at age 18 (26 with CA and therefore considered “resilient”), from a longitudinal cohort. Participants underwent a Social Feedback Task in the magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Social rejection feedback activated the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the left anterior insula. CA did not predict affective or neural responses to social rejection at age 18. Yet, CA predicted better friendships at age 14 and age 18, when adolescents with and without CA had comparable mood levels. Thus, adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support and seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a subsample of 55 mentally healthy 18-year-olds from the ROOTS cohort, childhood adversity (CA) did not predict altered mood or AI/dACC neural responses to social rejection, although CA predicted higher friendship support at age 14 and age 18. The authors conclude that resilient adolescents with CA show largely normal responses to social rejection, with no evidence that adolescent family or friendship support mediates these responses.
Key findings
- Social rejection feedback activated the left anterior insula (AI; z = 4.97, p < .05 FWE-corrected) and bilateral dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC; z = 4.81, p < .05 FWE-corrected); negative feedback was rated as more disturbing than neutral feedback, t(54) = –13.33, p < .001.
- CA did not predict AI or dACC responses to social rejection at age 18; effects were nonsignificant and negligible (e.g., brain R² = .03 for friendship models, .015 for family models). CA marginally predicted less negative mood responses (friendship model: est = –.28, p = .05; family model: est = –.25, p = .06).
- CA predicted higher friendship support at age 14 (est = .29, p = .03) and at age 18 in exploratory analyses, but not at age 17; CA did not predict family support at ages 14, 17, or 18. Neither friendship nor family support mediated the relationship between CA and affective or neural responses to social rejection.
- Post hoc sensitivity analyses indicated that with the available sample size (M = 53, range 47–55), the study could detect moderate effects (a path: f² = .154; b path: f² = .193 or R² increase = .154) at α = .05 and power = .80, but mediation effects were less well powered.
Methods
- Participants were drawn from the longitudinal ROOTS cohort (N = 1,238); the MRI substudy included 67 adolescents, and analyses used 55 participants (25 females, 30 males; 26 with CA, 29 without CA) at age 18.
- Participants completed an fMRI Social Feedback Task involving 36 judge feedback slides (12 best, 12 moderate, 12 worst) and mood ratings after each; the key contrast was “negative more than neutral” feedback.
- Analyses used path models in R with lavaan, full information maximum likelihood (FIML) and a robust estimator (MLR), testing whether family or friendship support at ages 14 and 17 mediated the relationship between CA before age 11 and affective or neural (AI/dACC) responses to social rejection at age 18.
Limitations
- The paper states that statistical power was limited by sample size, especially for indirect/mediation effects, and that moderation analyses were not performed because the sample was insufficient to detect interaction effects.
- The paper also notes that CA was assessed retrospectively via primary-caregiver interview, friendship and family support were not assessed prior to CA, the ROOTS sample is wealthier than the average UK population, CA experiences were mainly mild to moderate, and a subset of the CA group had past mental health problems.
- Evident from the text: the MRI subsample was selected based on CA presence/absence and 5-HTTLPR genotype, and gender-specific exploratory analyses were underpowered, so findings may not generalize to other samples or to more severe/clinical CA populations.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 81 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Childhood adversity predicted better friendships at age 14.
“CA predicted better friendships at age 14 and age 18, when adolescents with and without CA had comparable mood levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Childhood adversity did not predict neural responses to social rejection at age 18.
“CA did not predict affective or neural responses to social rejection at age 18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adolescents with and without childhood adversity had comparable mood levels at age 18.
“CA predicted better friendships at age 14 and age 18, when adolescents with and without CA had comparable mood levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Social rejection feedback activated the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the left anterior insula.
“Social rejection feedback activated the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the left anterior insula.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Childhood adversity did not predict affective responses to social rejection at age 18.
“CA did not predict affective or neural responses to social rejection at age 18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Childhood adversity predicted better friendships at age 18.
“CA predicted better friendships at age 14 and age 18, when adolescents with and without CA had comparable mood levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Childhood adversity (CA) is associated with less negative mood responses to social rejection feedback, albeit weakly.
“Our findings showed that CA is associated with less negative mood responses to social rejection feedback, albeit this was a weak relationship (Table 3).”
- Also stated in: § Does adolescent family support function as an intermediate variable for the relationship between CA and later responses to social rejection? · hedged
“CA was marginally associated with lower negative affective responses to social rejection feedback (Table 4).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“CA only marginally predicted affective responses to social rejection feedback (i.e., lower negative mood responses).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Does adolescent family support function as an intermediate variable for the relationship between CA and later responses to social rejection? · hedged
- Findingown data
Neither friendship support at age 14 nor at age 17 predicted AI or dACC responses to social rejection feedback.
“neither friendship support at age 14, nor at age 17, predicted AI or dACC responses to social rejection feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Negative judge feedback was experienced as more disturbing than neutral judge feedback.
““negative” judge feedback was experienced as more disturbing than “neutral” judge feedback, t (54) = –13.33, p < .001”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The effect of CA and friendship support on mood was marginal and small.
“the effect of CA and friendship support on mood was marginal and small (Mean R2 = .07)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CA predicted higher levels of friendship support at age 14.
“CA predicted higher levels of friendship support at age 14”
- Also stated in: § Exploratory analyses: Neural responses · plain
“we again found that adolescents with a history of CA have on average a higher level of adolescent friendship support at age 14 (Mean R2 = .09).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Exploratory analyses: Neural responses · plain
- Findingown data
CA did not predict friendship support at age 17.
“CA predicted higher levels of friendship support at age 14, but did not predict friendship support at age 17.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Both friendship support variables did not mediate the relationship between CA and responses to social rejection feedback (affective and neural).
“both friendship support variables did not mediate the relationship between CA and responses to social rejection feedback (i.e., affective and neural).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Friendship support at age 14 was strongly associated with friendship support at age 17.
“Friendship support at age 14 was strongly associated with friendship support at age 17.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CA was not related to AI or dACC responses to social rejection feedback.
“CA was not related with AI or dACC responses to social rejection feedback.”
- Also stated in: § Does adolescent family support function as an intermediate variable for the relationship between CA and later responses to social rejection? · plain
“CA was not related to AI and dACC responses to social rejection feedback”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Our data showed that CA in concurrently resilient adolescents does not predict neural (i.e., AI and dACC) responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Does adolescent family support function as an intermediate variable for the relationship between CA and later responses to social rejection? · plain
- Findingown data
At ages 14 and 18, adolescents with CA reported similar levels of depressive symptoms as those without CA.
“At ages 14 and 18, our sample of adolescents with CA reported similar levels of depressive symptoms as those without CA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CA had no effect on neural social acceptance responsivity.
“we revealed neither an effect of CA nor an effect of friendship and/or family support on neural social acceptance responsivity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Family support at age 14 and age 17 did not predict AI responses to social rejection feedback.
“family support at age 14 and age 17 did not predict affective and AI responses to social rejection feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Family support at age 14 was strongly associated with family support at age 17.
“Family support at age 14 was strongly associated with family support at age 17.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
None of the correlational results suggested significant gender-specific findings with regard to neural responses.
“None of the correlational results suggested significant gender-specific findings with regard to neural responses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For female participants, CA was associated with a significantly higher amount of friendship support at age 14.
“For female participants, CA was associated with a significantly higher amount of friendship support at age 14 (r = .41; 95% confidence interval, CI [0.02, 0.69])”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CA was not associated with an increase in neural responses to social rejection.
“our finding that CA was not associated with an increase in neural responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Family and/or friendship support had no effect on neural social acceptance responsivity.
“we revealed neither an effect of CA nor an effect of friendship and/or family support on neural social acceptance responsivity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CA did not predict family support at ages 14, 17, or 18.
“CA was not related to AI and dACC responses to social rejection feedback, and did not predict family support at ages 14 and 17.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“we found that CA did not predicted adolescent family support at age 14, at age 17, or at age 18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Neither family nor friendship support at age 18 mediated the relationship between CA and neural responsivity to social rejection.
“neither family nor friendship support at age 18 mediated the relationship between CA and neural responsivity to social rejection”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Family support at age 14 was marginally associated with lower dACC responsivity.
“family support at age 14 was marginally associated with lower dACC responsivity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Both family support variables did not mediate the relationship between CA and responses to social rejection feedback (affective and neural).
“both family support variables did not mediate the relationship between CA and responses to social rejection feedback (i.e., affective and neural).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Family support at age 17 was marginally associated with increased dACC responsivity.
“family support at age 17 was marginally associated with increased dACC responsivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At age 17, CA adolescents had on average higher depressive symptoms than adolescents without CA.
“whereas at age 17, the CA adolescents had on average higher depressive symptoms than adolescents without CA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Family support at age 14 and age 17 did not predict affective responses to social rejection feedback.
“family support at age 14 and age 17 did not predict affective and AI responses to social rejection feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In none of the models were both the a and b paths significant.
“in none of the models both the a and the b paths were significant”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The sample reported mainly mild to moderate CA experiences.
“Fourth, our sample reported mainly mild to moderate CA experiences (Walsh et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Walsh et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The AI and dACC main effect areas for social acceptance responsivity were notably larger than the main effect areas for social rejection responsivity (AI: 85 vs 9; dACC: 1218 vs 19 k-voxels).
“the AI and dACC main effect areas for social acceptance responsivity (AI: k-voxels = 85; dACC: k-voxels = 1218) were notably larger than the main effect areas for social rejection responsivity (AI: k-voxels = 9; dACC: k-voxels = 19)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In most of the models at least one of the two path coefficients had a small effect.
“in most of the models at least one of the two path coefficients had a small effect”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In terms of SES, the subsample did not differ from the remaining ROOTS sample.
“in terms of SES, our subsample did not differ from the remaining ROOTS sample”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The study did not find evidence that social support reduces later affective or neural (AI and dACC) responses to social rejection.
“Contrary to our hypothesis, we also did not find evidence for social support reducing later affective or neural (i.e., AI and dACC) responses to social rejection”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support.
“this is the first study to show that adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The results for the social acceptance and social rejection responsivity analyses were comparable.
“we revealed comparable results for the social acceptance and social rejection responsivity analyses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A subset of the CA group had experienced mental health problems in the past.
“Fifth, a subset of the CA group had experienced mental health problems in the past”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
At the time of scanning, the CA group was characterized by mental health resilience.
“although at the time of scanning our CA group was characterized by mental health resilience”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Adolescents with childhood adversity and normative mood levels seem to have normal neural responses to social rejection.
“Thus, adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support and seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Adolescents with childhood adversity and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support.
“Thus, adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support and seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Social support significantly decreases the probability of negative mental health consequences in individuals with a history of childhood adversity.
“Social support significantly decreases the probability of negative mental health consequences in individuals with a history of CA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dion et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Folger & O'Dougherty Wright, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Horan & Widom, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Adolescents with childhood adversity and normative mood levels seem to have normal mood responses to social rejection.
“Thus, adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support and seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Individuals exposed to childhood adversity seem to experience less social support during adolescence and young adulthood than their peers without a history of adversity.
“individuals who have been exposed to CA seem to experience less social support during adolescence and young adulthood than their peers without a history of adversity (e.g., Horan & Widom, 2015; Miller, Adams, Esposito-Smythers, Thompson, & Proctor, 2014; Sperry & Widom, 2013)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Horan & Widom, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Miller, Adams, Esposito-Smythers, Thompson, & Proctor, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sperry & Widom, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In a previous report in the larger ROOTS cohort, family support mediated, but not moderated, the relationship between childhood adversity and depressive symptoms.
“In a previous report in the larger ROOTS cohort, we found that family support mediated, but not moderated, the relationship between CA and depressive symptoms (van Harmelen et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Harmelen et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
When adolescents with and without CA have comparable mood levels, adolescents with CA have higher levels of friendship support.
“Thus, our findings showed that when adolescents with and without CA have comparable mood levels, adolescents with CA have higher levels of friendship support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
None of the CA participants was adopted or in foster care.
“(b) none of the CA participants was adopted or in foster care”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
The 'positive more than neutral' contrast revealed significant main effects in the left AI and bilateral dACC, reflecting social acceptance responsivity.
“The Social Feedback Task revealed not only significant main effects in the AI and the dACC for the contrast “negative more than neutral” but also for the contrast “positive more than neutral,” reflecting social acceptance responsivity (left AI: x = –28, y = 16, z = –12, k-voxel = 85, z statistic = 5.85, p < .05, FWE corrected; bilateral dACC: x = 0, y = 32, z = 24, k-voxel = 1218, z statistic = 6.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dalgleish et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Negative mood responses to social rejection are not specific to adolescents with a history of chronic social rejection.
“but (b) negative mood responses to social rejection are not specific to adolescents with a history of chronic social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Will et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van Harmelen et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The study did not have enough information to disentangle potentially differing effects of rejection, and adverse loss and separation, experiences on social rejection.
“Therefore, we did not have enough information to disentangle potentially differing effects of rejection, and adverse loss and separation, experiences on social rejection”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A history of CA may rather tend to go together with less negative mood responses to social rejection.
“our findings seemed to suggest that a history of CA may rather tend to go together with less negative mood responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Enhanced emotion regulation capacity may be an alternative explanation for the finding that CA was not associated with an increase in neural responses to social rejection.
“and thus may be an alternative explanation for our finding that CA was not associated with an increase in neural responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
CA adolescents in our sample had enhanced emotion regulation capacity supported on the affective and neural level.
“However, the enhanced emotion regulation capacity of CA adolescents in our sample was supported not only on the affective but also on the neural level (Schweizer et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schweizer et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Selecting resilient 18-year-olds with a history of mild to moderate family adversity may have led to overinclusion of those with CA who received and/or perceived more friendship support in early adolescence.
“That is, selecting resilient 18-year-olds, with a history of mild to moderate family adversity, may have led to the overinclusion of those with CA who received and/or perceived more friendship support in early adolescence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Enhanced emotion regulation capacity may explain why CA adolescents seemed to have normal, or perhaps even less negative, mood responses to social rejection.
“Therefore, enhanced emotion regulation capacity may explain why CA adolescents seemed to have normal, or perhaps even less negative, mood responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Mood levels seem to be lower during social rejection, when compared to positive or neutral social interactions, regardless of CA exposure.
“Thus, mood levels seem to be lower during social rejection, when compared to positive or neutral social interactions, regardless of CA exposure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
At age 18, mentally healthy adolescents with CA are more efficient in emotion regulation than mentally healthy adolescents without CA.
“which revealed that at age 18 mentally healthy adolescents with CA are more efficient in emotion regulation than mentally healthy adolescents without CA (Schweizer et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schweizer et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Only 4 of the 26 participants with CA had a history of childhood emotional maltreatment.
“(c) only 4 of the 26 participants with CA had a history of childhood emotional maltreatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Social rejection by peers was not assessed in this study.
“In our study (a) social rejection by peers was not assessed”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The findings are restricted to current mental health resilience at the time of the social rejection assessment.
“Therefore, our findings are restricted to current mental health resilience at the time of the social rejection assessment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The statistical power of the tested models was limited by the sample size.
“Critics may rightfully argue that the statistical power of the tested models was limited by our sample size”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
With the sample size (M = 53, range 47-55), α = .05, and power = .80, the study would have been able to detect moderate effects (a path f2 = .154; b path omnibus f2 = .193 or R2 increase f2 = .154).
“We revealed that with our sample size (M sample size = 53 [ranging from 47 to 55 observations per variable], an α of .05 and a power of .80), we would have been able to detect moderate effects (a path: f2 = .154; b path: omnibus effect of f2 = .193 or R2 increase in variance explained of f2 = .154).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Adolescent family support does not improve affective or neural responses to social rejection at age 18.
“our findings suggest that adolescent family support does not improve affective or neural responses to social rejection at age 18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The null findings for the indirect (mediation) effects are the result of nonsignificant path effects.
“we believe that the null findings for the indirect (mediation) effects are the result of nonsignificant path effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The generalizability of the results might be restricted to prosperous populations.
“indicating that the generalizability of our results might be restricted to prosperous populations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The ROOTS sample is wealthier than the average UK population.
“Third, the ROOTS sample is wealthier than the average UK population (Goodyer et al., 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goodyer et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The rather small voxel size area for social rejection responsivity is unlikely to have compromised the statistical power of the analyses.
“we believe that the rather small voxel size area for social rejection responsivity is unlikely to have compromised the statistical power of the analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Adolescent friendship support has lasting protective effects on social rejection responsivity.
“which suggests lasting protective effects of adolescent friendship support on social rejection responsivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The sample is not powered to examine whether the effects were similar or distinct in those with versus without previous mental health problems.
“Unfortunately, our sample is not powered to examine whether the effects were similar or distinct in those with versus without previous mental health problems, as this would result in a sample of only 15 adolescents with a history of CA who had no lifetime mental health problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
Power was predominantly limited for the indirect (mediation) effects.
“That said, it needs to be acknowledged that power was predominantly limited for the indirect (mediation) effects (Fritz & MacKinnon, 2007; MacKinnon et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fritz & MacKinnon, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites MacKinnon et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Power analyses indicated that the sample size would not have been sufficient to detect interaction effects.
“power analyses indicated that our sample size would not have been sufficient to detect interaction effects (see for details Appendix F)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
A lack of protective effects of friendship support due to the studied developmental phases is unlikely.
“For friendship support a lack of protective effects due to the studied developmental phases is unlikely.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 29
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 47
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither friendship support at age 14 nor at age 17 predicted affective responses to social rejection feedback.
“neither friendship support at age 14, nor at age 17, predicted affective responses to social rejection feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe childhood adversity group reported higher depressive symptoms at age 17, but not at age 14, nor at age 18.
“The CA group did report higher depressive symptoms at age 17, but not at age 14, nor at age 18.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn both groups, the minority of adolescents had psychopathological symptoms at some point in life, yet all adolescents had no recent psychiatric disorder episode at age 18.
“In both groups, the minority of adolescents had psychopathological symptoms at some point in life (i.e., previous psychiatric history), yet all adolescents had no recent psychiatric disorder episode at age 18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe current sample did not differ from the remaining ROOTS sample in terms of age, gender, SES, friendship support, family support, recent negative life events, prior psychiatric history, self-esteem, mood, or 5-HTTLPR genotype.
“The current sample did not differ from the remaining ROOTS sample in terms of age (U = 28, p = .99), gender (U = 36, p = .17), SES (U = 31, p = .59), friendship support (U = 24, p = .56), family support (U = 19, p = .24), recent negative life events (U = 24, p = .84), prior psychiatric history (U = 28, p = .88), self-esteem (U = 24, p = .93), mood (U = 25, p = .88), or 5-HTTLPR genotype (U = 32, p”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChildhood adversity versus no-childhood-adversity groups did not differ in age, gender, SES, IQ, previous psychiatric history, or 5-HTTLPR genotype.
“CA versus no-CA groups did not differ in age, gender, SES, IQ, previous psychiatric history, or 5-HTTLPR genotype (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCA was associated with a higher level of friendship support at age 18.
“CA was associated with a higher level of friendship support at age 18”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn separate models, neither family support at age 14 nor at age 17 was significantly associated with dACC responsivity to social rejection feedback.
“neither family support at age 14 nor at age 17 was significantly associated with dACC responsivity to social rejection feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect of CA and friendship support on the brain was nonsignificant and negligible.
“the same effect on the brain was not only nonsignificant but also negligible (R2 = .03).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect of CA and family support on mood was nonsignificant and small.
“the effect of CA and family support on mood (Mean R2 = .06) did both not reach significance and had small effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe effect of CA and family support on the brain was nonsignificant and negligible.
“the effect of CA and family support on the brain (Mean R2 = .015) were both not only nonsignificant but had negligible effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAdolescents with CA and normative mood levels seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection.
“and seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeither the main effect of CA nor the main effect of the support variables on brain responses to social rejection revealed significance.
“neither the main effect of CA, nor the main effect of the support variables on brain responses to social rejection revealed significance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost of the revealed effects of social support on social rejection responsivity were nonsignificant and noticeably small.
“most of the revealed effects were not only nonsignificant but also noticeably small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNot all individuals who face adversity develop mental illnesses, and thus are characterized as mentally healthy or resilient.
“not all individuals who face adversity develop mental illnesses, and thus are characterized as “mentally healthy” or “resilient” (Afifi & MacMillan, 2011; Fritz, de Graaff, Caisley, van Harmelen, & Wilkinson, 2018)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Afifi & MacMillan, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fritz, de Graaff, Caisley, van Harmelen, & Wilkinson, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSocial rejection is associated with activation in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the anterior insula.
“Several recent reviews consistently concluded that, at the neural level, social rejection is associated with activation in the (dorsal) anterior cingulate cortex ([d]ACC) and the (anterior) insula ([A]I; Cacioppo et al., 2013; Kawamoto, Ura, & Nittono, 2015; Wang, Braun, & Enck, 2017)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cacioppo et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kawamoto, Ura, & Nittono, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wang, Braun, & Enck, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationChildhood adversity is associated with an increased vulnerability to the development of psychopathology.
“Various studies have shown that CA is associated with an increased vulnerability to the development of psychopathology (Greif Green et al., 2010; Kessler et al., 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Greif Green et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kessler et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThose exposed to childhood adversity are more likely to experience social rejection.
“those exposed to CA are more likely to experience social rejection (e.g., emotional and physical bullying; van Harmelen et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Harmelen et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth friendship and family support reduce the risk of subsequent psychopathology.
“both friendship and family support have been found to reduce the risk of subsequent psychopathology (Dion et al., 2016; Folger & O'Dougherty Wright, 2013; Horan & Widom, 2015; Runtz & Schallow, 1997; Sperry & Widom, 2013; van Harmelen et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dion et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Folger & O'Dougherty Wright, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Horan & Widom, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIndividuals with a history of childhood adversity are prone to suffer from cognitive, emotional, and social difficulties.
“individuals with a history of CA are prone to suffer from cognitive, emotional, and social difficulties (Cicchetti, 2013; Cicchetti & Rogosch, 1997; Spinhoven et al., 2010; Walsh, Dawson, & Mattingly, 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cicchetti, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cicchetti & Rogosch, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Spinhoven et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSupport from both friends and family contribute to the protective effect of social support.
“Some studies have suggested that support from both friends and family contribute to the protective effect of social support (Horan & Widom, 2015; Runtz & Schallow, 1997; van Harmelen et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Horan & Widom, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Runtz & Schallow, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van Harmelen et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMental health following adversity is facilitated by various resilience or protective factors, including biological, intraindividual, family, and community factors.
“Mental health following adversity is facilitated by various so-called resilience or protective factors, including biological (e.g., genes), intraindividual (e.g., distress tolerance), family (e.g., family support), and community factors (e.g., friendship support; Fritz et al., 2018; Ioannidis, Askelund, & van Harmelen, 2017; Kalisch et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fritz et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ioannidis, Askelund, & van Harmelen, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kalisch et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDue to ongoing social and neural development during adolescence, the protective effects of social support may vary across adolescence.
“Due to ongoing social and neural development during adolescence (Casey, Getz, & Galvan, 2008; Crone & Dahl, 2012; Crone & Elzinga, 2015), the protective effects of social support may vary across adolescence.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Casey, Getz, & Galvan, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Crone & Dahl, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Crone & Elzinga, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNo other regions were activated at the FWE-corrected threshold in the previous report.
“No other regions were activated at this threshold (see, for details, Dalgleish et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dalgleish et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationChildhood adversity is associated with altered neural responses to social rejection.
“CA is associated with altered neural responses to social rejection (Wang et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe FAD adequately differentiates between appropriate and inappropriate family functioning and was found to have acceptable test-retest reliability.
“The FAD adequately differentiates between appropriate and inappropriate family functioning and was found to have an acceptable test–retest reliability (Epstein et al., 1983; Miller et al., 1985; Ridenour et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Epstein et al., 1983
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Miller et al., 1985
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ridenour et al., 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn late adolescence and young adulthood, the AI and dACC may be implicated in responsivity to social evaluation more broadly, as those regions were similarly activated during social rejection and acceptance feedback.
“our recent study showed that in late adolescence and young adulthood, the AI and the dACC may be implicated in responsivity to social evaluation even more broadly, as those regions were similarly activated during social rejection and acceptance feedback (Dalgleish et al., 2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dalgleish et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSocial support is associated with decreased responsivity in the anterior insula.
“social support is associated with decreased responsivity in the (anterior) insula (Masten, Telzer, Fuligni, Lieberman, & Eisenberger, 2012; Onoda et al., 2009)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Masten, Telzer, Fuligni, Lieberman, & Eisenberger, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Onoda et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAltered neural responsivity to social rejection is associated with later depressive symptoms.
“altered neural responsivity to social rejection is associated with later depressive symptoms (Masten et al., 2011)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Masten et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationThe CFQ was found to have good external validity and acceptable test-retest reliability (κ = .80).
“The CFQ was found to have a good external validity, and an acceptable test–retest reliability (κ = .80; van Harmelen et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Harmelen et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe AI and dACC are suggested to be particularly important for the detection and appraisal of adverse social situations.
“The AI and the dACC are suggested to be particularly important for the detection and the appraisal of adverse social situations (Kawamoto et al., 2015)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kawamoto et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAltered neural responsivity to social rejection in those with a history of childhood adversity may further increase the vulnerability to psychopathology.
“altered neural responsivity to social rejection in those with a history of CA may further increase the vulnerability to psychopathology (cf. latent vulnerability theory; McCrory & Viding, 2015)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McCrory & Viding, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdolescents with a history of chronic social rejection experiences in childhood displayed increased dACC and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex responsivity.
“adolescents with a history of chronic social rejection experiences in childhood displayed increased dACC and dorsal medial prefrontal cortex responsivity (van Harmelen et al., 2014; Will, van Lier, Crone, & Güroğlu, 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites van Harmelen et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Will, van Lier, Crone, & Güroğlu, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe insula is involved in cognitive control, emotion, motivation, and pain.
“the Insula is known to be involved in cognitive control, emotion, motivation, and pain (Wager & Feldman Barrett, 2017)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wager & Feldman Barrett, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSocial support is associated with decreased responsivity in the dACC.
“and the dACC (Eisenberger, Gable, & Lieberman, 2007; Masten et al., 2012)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Eisenberger, Gable, & Lieberman, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Masten et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe investigated ROOTS subsample only included adolescents without recent psychiatric disorder episodes at age 18, which makes it more likely that the assessment of affective and neural responsivity to social rejection is not confounded by concurrent psychopathological symptoms.
“The investigated ROOTS subsample only included adolescents without recent psychiatric disorder episodes at age 18, which makes it more likely that the assessment of affective and neural responsivity to social rejection is not confounded by concurrent psychopathological symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAt age 18 the group of adolescents with a history of childhood adversity had normative, or good, mental health, and could be considered as functioning resiliently.
“Hence, at age 18 the group of adolescents with a history of CA had normative, or good, mental health, and could be considered as functioning resiliently (i.e., good mental health despite adversity; Fritz et al., 2018; Kalisch et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fritz et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kalisch et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe CAMEEI was found to have adequate interrater reliability (n = 48, κ = .7 to .9).
“The CAMEEI was found to have an adequate interrater reliability (n = 48, κ = .7 to .9; Goodyer et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goodyer et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe dACC is associated with the evaluation and specification of control.
“the dACC is associated with the evaluation and specification of control (Shenhav, Cohen, & Botvinick, 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shenhav, Cohen, & Botvinick, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn a previous report on this sample, the 'negative more than neutral' contrast revealed significant responsivity in the left AI and the bilateral dACC.
“In a previous report on this sample, Dalgleish et al. (2017) showed that the “negative more than neutral” contrast revealed a significant responsivity in the left AI (z = 4.97, p < .05 FWE corrected) and the bilateral dACC (z = 4.81, p < .05 FWE corrected).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dalgleish et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationSocial support may facilitate healthy neural functioning through its impact on AI and dACC responsivity to social rejection.
“Thus, social support may facilitate healthy neural functioning through its impact on AI and dACC responsivity to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSocial rejection is associated with negative mood responses.
“Will et al. (2016) as well as van Harmelen et al. (2014) showed that (a) social rejection is associated with negative mood responses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Will et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites van Harmelen et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataIn males, family-related adversity appears to be associated with less negative mood in response to social rejection.
“whereas in males family-related adversity appears to be associated with less negative mood in response to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCA may impact the role of social support as well as affective responses to rejection differently in males and females.
“Hence, our post hoc explorations seemed to indicate that CA may impact the role of social support as well as affective responses to rejection differently in males and females.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIndividuals exposed to CA experience less social support during adolescence and young adulthood than their peers without a history of adversity.
“The notion that individuals who have been exposed to CA experience less social support during adolescence and young adulthood than their peers without a history of adversity has sound support in the resilience literature (Horan & Widom, 2015; Miller et al., 2014; Runtz & Schallow, 1997; Sperry & Widom, 2013; van Harmelen et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Horan & Widom, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Miller et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Runtz & Schallow, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe 'negative more than neutral' responsivity contrast was family-wise error corrected (FWE; whole-brain, voxel-wise threshold of p < .05).
“For the below analyses we used the “negative more than neutral” responsivity contrast, which was family-wise error corrected (FWE; whole-brain, voxel-wise threshold of p < .05; Dalgleish et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dalgleish et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn females, family-related adversity may impact predominantly on social relations, potentially resulting in higher friendship and lower family support.
“Our post hoc explorations of gender effects suggest that in females family-related adversity may impact predominantly on social relations, potentially resulting in higher friendship and lower family support”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe sample size did not allow for examining gender as a group effect or as a covariate.
“Our sample size did neither allow for examining gender as a group effect, nor as a covariate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn mentally healthy adolescents with CA, neural responses to social rejection are not altered, and mood responses are at best marginally altered.
“adolescents with CA did not seem to have altered neural (i.e., AI and dACC) and at best marginally altered mood responses to social rejection at age 18, when they were characterized by mental health resilience.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAdolescents with CA have normal neural responses as well as normal, or perhaps even less negative, mood responses to social rejection, when they are mentally healthy.
“This suggests that adolescents with CA have normal neural responses as well as normal, or perhaps even less negative, mood responses to social rejection, when they are mentally healthy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe nature of the CA variable and selecting resilient 18-year-old CA adolescents may be another reason why CA was associated with higher levels of friendship support.
“Therefore, the nature of our CA variable in combination with solely selecting resilient 18-year-old CA adolescents may be another reason why CA was associated with higher levels of friendship support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe FIML algorithm does not exclude missing values and establishes case-wise maximum likelihood functions, making use of all available information.
“The FIML algorithm does not exclude missing values and establishes case-wise maximum likelihood functions, making use of all available information (Enders & Bandalos, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Enders & Bandalos, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDifferent forms of CA are differentially associated with insula and dACC responsivity to social rejection, with some forms having an opposite association sign.
“Different forms of CA are found to be differentially associated with insula and dACC responsivity to social rejection, with some forms of CA even having an opposite association sign (e.g., increased dACC responsivity in adolescents with a history of chronic social rejection compared to decreased dACC responsivity in adolescents with adverse loss and separation experiences in childhood; Puetz et al”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Puetz et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Will et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe analyses utilized a robust estimator (MLR) that can calculate robust standard errors and scaled test statistics despite incomplete data.
“we utilized a robust estimator (MLR), which can calculate robust standard errors and scaled test statistics despite incomplete data (Rosseel, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rosseel, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningParticipants with chronic social rejection experiences had higher neural responses and participants with adverse loss and separation experiences had lower neural responses to social rejection, which may have canceled each other out.
“it may have been the case that participants with chronic social rejection experiences had higher neural responses and participants with adverse loss and separation experiences had lower neural responses to social rejection, which may have canceled each other out”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCaregiver reports on CA relate slightly differentially to later mental distress than self-reported CA.
“As caregiver reports on CA are found to relate slightly differentially to later mental distress than self-reported CA (Newbury et al., 2018)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Newbury et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFamily support appears to lower stress responsivity during childhood but not during adolescence.
“showing that family support appears to lower stress responsivity during childhood but not during adolescence (Hostinar, Johnson, & Gunnar, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hostinar, Johnson, & Gunnar, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis is the first study to show that adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support and seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection.
“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show that adolescents with CA and normative mood levels have more adolescent friendship support and seem to have normal mood and neural responses to social rejection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe time intervals of the CAMEEI (early, middle, and late childhood) enhanced recall and report accuracy of CA and decreased the impact of recency effects.
“However, the time intervals of the CAMEEI (early, middle, and late childhood) enhanced recall and report accuracy of CA, and decreased the impact of recency effects (Dunn et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dunn et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt cannot be determined whether the adolescents with a history of CA already had higher friendship levels prior to the CA experience.
“Therefore, it cannot be determined whether the adolescents with a history of CA already had higher friendship levels prior to the CA experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHigher levels of friendship interactions at age 18 are associated with lower AI and dACC responsivity to social rejection at age 20.
“Masten et al. (2012) showed that higher levels of friendship interactions at age 18 are associated with lower AI and dACC responsivity to social rejection at age 20 (Masten et al., 2012)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Masten et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationMaternal support reduces unfavorable affect-related behavior and neural responses in healthy children but not in healthy adolescents.
“Similarly, maternal support was found to reduce unfavorable affect-related behavior and neural responses in healthy children, but not in healthy adolescents (Gee et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gee et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenFriendship and family support were not assessed prior to CA.
“Second, friendship and family support were not assessed prior to CA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe CA interview was retrospectively performed with a primary caregiver.
“First, the CA interview was retrospectively performed with a primary caregiver (Dunn et al., 2011; Goodyer et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dunn et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goodyer et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningA higher sample size would have increased the chance to detect small path effects.
“a higher sample size would have been desirable, and would have increased the chance to detect small path effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn mentally healthy 18-year-old adolescents, mood and neural (AI and dACC) responses to social rejection do not seem to be altered by a CA history and/or the level of adolescent family and friendship support.
“In sum, our findings suggest that mood and neural (AI and dACC) responses to social rejection, in mentally healthy 18-year-old adolescents, do not seem to be altered by a CA history and/ or the level of adolescent family and friendship support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferent forms of social support-emotionally supportive texts, social interaction quality, and friendship interaction frequency and duration-are associated with decreased social rejection responsivity in either the AI, the dACC, or both.
“The literature showed that different forms of social support, that is (a) emotionally supportive texts, (b) social interaction quality, and (c) friendship interaction frequency and duration, are associated with decreased social rejection responsivity in either the AI, the dACC, or both (Eisenberger et al., 2007; Masten et al., 2012; Onoda et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Eisenberger et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Masten et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Onoda et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The anterior insula, part of the salience network, has been implicated in atypical responses to social exclusion in depression and anxiety, but the direction of effects has been mixed.
“The anterior insula, part of the salience network, has also been implicated in atypical responses to social exclusion in depression(123,126) and anxiety,(127) but the direction of effects has been mixed.”
From Puberty Initiates Cascading Relationships Between Neurodevelopmental, Social, and Internalizing Processes Across Adolescence (2021) · cites this paper as [127]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentz = 4.97reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001
“(z = 4.97, p < .05”
- Consistentz = 4.81reported p < .05 · recomputed p < .001
“(z = 4.81, p < .05”
- Consistentt(54) = -13.33reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t (54) = -13.33, p < .001”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Claim of no lower neural responsivity conflicts with family-support result
MajorThe discussion says adolescent social support was not associated with lower neural responsivity. Table 4 reports a negative association between family support at age 14 and dACC response, marked significant at p = .05*.
“social support (i.e., family and friendship support) at ages 14 and 17 was not associated with lower negative mood or neural responsivity to social rejection at age 18.”
“| Fam. sup. age 14 | dACC response | –.28 | .14 | −2.01 | .05* | –.55 | –.01 |”
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,542 · see citing works
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · see citing works
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971 · see citing works
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126 · see citing works
<b>lavaan</b> : An <i>R</i> Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955 · see citing works
(1998) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · Cited by 19,139 · see citing works
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810 · see citing works
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 10,216 · see citing works
KAUFMAN, J., BIRMAHER, B., BRENT, D., RAO, U., FLYNN, C., MORECI, P., WILLIAMSON, D., & RYAN, N. (1997) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021 · Cited by 10,148 · see citing works
Child abuse: Adolescent records vs. adult recall
Femina, D. D., Yeager, C. A., & Lewis, D. O. (1990) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/0145-2134(90)90033-p · Cited by 8,820 · see citing works
The mini international neuropsychiatric interview
Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Hergueta, T., & Weiller, E. (1998) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(99)80239-9 · Cited by 5,882 · see citing works
MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 · Cited by 5,688 · see citing works
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Veizel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2519 · Cited by 5,547 · see citing works
Enders, C., & Bandalos, D. (2001) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0803_5 · Cited by 4,978 · see citing works
Required sample size to detect the mediated effect
Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x · Cited by 4,810 · see citing works
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Wechsler, D. (1999) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15170-000 · Cited by 4,681 · see citing works
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164413495237 · Cited by 3,931 · see citing works
Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries
Gilbert, R., Widom, C. S., Browne, K., Fergusson, D., Webb, E., & Janson, S. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61706-7 · Cited by 3,876 · see citing works
THE McMASTER FAMILY ASSESSMENT DEVICE*
Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x · Cited by 3,584 · see citing works
Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., & Hare, T. A. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.010 · Cited by 3,345 · see citing works
Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys
Kessler, R. C., McLaughlin, K. A., Green, J. G., Gruber, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alhamzawi, A. O., Alonso, J., Angermeyer, M., et al. (2010) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.080499 · Cited by 2,640 · see citing works
Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility
Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3313 · Cited by 2,507 · see citing works
Green, J. G., McLaughlin, K. A., Berglund, P. A., Gruber, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Kessler, R. C. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.186 · Cited by 2,323 · see citing works
Casey, B. J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003 · Cited by 1,810 · see citing works
Childhood adversity and adult psychiatric disorder in the US National Comorbidity Survey
KESSLER, R. C., DAVIS, C. G., & KENDLER, K. S. (1997) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291797005588 · Cited by 1,298 · see citing works
THE McMASTER FAMILY ASSESSMENT DEVICE: RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY*
Miller, I. W., Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Keitner, G. I. (1985) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1985.tb00028.x · Cited by 1,244 · see citing works
The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders
Kalisch, R., Baker, D. G., Basten, U., Boks, M. P., Bonanno, G. A., Brummelman, E., Chmitorz, A., Fernàndez, G., Fiebach, C. J., Galatzer-Levy, I., et al. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0200-8 · Cited by 782 · see citing works
Cicchetti, D. (2013) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02608.x · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Resilience following child maltreatment: a review of protective factors
Afifi, T. O., & MacMillan, H. L. (2011) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371105600505 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control
Shenhav, A., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4384 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
The role of self-organization in the promotion of resilience in maltreated children
Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1997) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579497001442 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Goodyer, I. M., Herbert, J., Tamplin, A., & Altham, P. M. E. (2000) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.177.6.499 · Cited by 436 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(cid:129) Recent negative life events were assessed with the Life Events Questionnaire (adapted from Goodyer, Herbert, Tamplin, & Altham, 2000; Walsh et al., 2012).”
Self-citation(1995) · NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Newbury, J. B., Arseneault, L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Danese, A., Baldwin, J. R., & Fisher, H. L. (2018) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.09.020 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Sperry, D. M., & Widom, C. S. (2013) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2013.02.006 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
Gee, D. G., Gabard-Durnam, L., Telzer, E. H., Humphreys, K. L., Goff, B., Shapiro, M., Flannery, J., Lumian, D. S., Fareri, D. S., Caldera, C., et al. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614550878 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
How does social support enhance resilience in the trauma-exposed individual?
Sippel, L. M., Pietrzak, R. H., Charney, D. S., Mayes, L. C., & Southwick, S. M. (2015) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-07832-200410 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Fritz, J., de Graaff, A. M., Caisley, H., van Harmelen, A., & Wilkinson, P. O. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00230 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Self-citationRuntz, M., & Schallow, J. R. (1997) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/s0145-2134(96)00147-0 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Spinhoven, P., Elzinga, B. M., Hovens, J. G. F. M., Karin Roelofs, A., Zitman, F. G., van Oppen, P., & Penninx, B. W. J. H. (2010) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.132 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Self-citationMcCrory, E. J., & Viding, E. (2015) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579415000115 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection
Cacioppo, S., Frum, C., Asp, E., Weiss, R. M., Lewis, J. W., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02027 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
van Harmelen, A.-L., Kievit, R. A., Ioannidis, K., Neufeld, S., Jones, P. B., Bullmore, E., Dolan, R., The NSPN Consortium, Fonagy, P., & Goodyer, I. (2017) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291717000836 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Friendships and family support reduce subsequent depressive symptoms in at‐risk adolescents
van Harmelen, A.-L., Gibson, J. L., St Clair, M. C., Owens, M., Brodbeck, J., Dunn, V., Lewis, G., Croudace, T., Jones, P. B., Kievit, R. A., et al. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153715 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Self-citationHostinar, C. E., Johnson, A. E., & Gunnar, M. R. (2015) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12195 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
From affect to control: Functional specialization of the insula in motivation and regulationPreprint
Wager, T. D., & Barrett, L. F. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/102368 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Time spent with friends in adolescence relates to less neural sensitivity to later peer rejection
Masten, C. L., Telzer, E. H., Fuligni, A. J., Lieberman, M. D., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2012) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq098 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Masten, C. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Borofsky, L. A., McNealy, K., Pfeifer, J. H., & Dapretto, M. (2011) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000799 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
McLaughlin, K. A., Green, J. G., Gruber, M. J., Sampson, N. A., Zaslavsky, A. M., & Kessler, R. C. (2009) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291709991115 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Will, G.-J., van Lier, P. A. C., Crone, E. A., & Güroğlu, B. (2016) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-015-9983-0 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Onoda, K., Okamoto, Y., Nakashima, K., Nittono, H., Ura, M., & Yamawaki, S. (2009) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470910902955884 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Walsh, W. A., Dawson, J., & Mattingly, M. J. (2010) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838009358892 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Eisenberger, N. I., Gable, S. L., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.745 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
How the brain reacts to social stress (exclusion) – A scoping review
Wang, H., Braun, C., & Enck, P. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.012 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Factor Analyses of the Family Assessment Device
Ridenour, T. A., Daley, J. G., & Reich, W. (1999) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00497.x · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Altering Risk Following Child Maltreatment: Family and Friend Support as Protective Factors
Folger, S. F., & Wright, M. O. (2013) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-013-9510-4 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Dunn, V. J., Abbott, R., Croudace, T. J., Wilkinson, P. O., Jones, P. B., Herbert, J., & Goodyer, I. M. (2011) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-11-109 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationvan Harmelen, A., Hauber, K., Moor, B. G., Spinhoven, P., Boon, A. E., Crone, E. A., & Elzinga, B. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085107 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationGeneral and specific effects of early-life psychosocial adversities on adolescent grey matter volume
Walsh, N., Dalgleish, T., Lombardo, M. V., Dunn, V. J., van Harmelen, A., Ban, M., & Goodyer, I. M. (2014) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.01.001 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Self-citationCrone, E. A., & Elzinga, B. M. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1327 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationDalgleish, T., Walsh, N. D., Mobbs, D., Schweizer, S., van Harmelen, A.-L., Dunn, B., Dunn, V., Goodyer, I., & Stretton, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42010 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom Childhood Maltreatment to Allostatic Load in Adulthood
Horan, J. M., & Widom, C. S. (2015) · Child Maltreatment · doi:10.1177/1077559515597063 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Goodyer, I. M., Croudace, T. J., Dunn, V. J., Herbert, J., & Jones, P. B. (2009) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyp173 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationRecent friendships in anxious and depressed school age children
Goodyer, I. M., Wright, C., & ALTHAM, P. M. E. (1989) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700011119 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural Response to Social Rejection in Children With Early Separation Experiences
Puetz, V. B., Kohn, N., Dahmen, B., Zvyagintsev, M., Schüppen, A., Schultz, R. T., Heim, C. C., Fink, G. R., Herpertz‐Dahlmann, B., & Konrad, K. (2014) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2014.09.004 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Schweizer, S., Walsh, N., Stretton, J., Dunn, V. J., Goodyer, I. M., & Dalgleish, T. (2015) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv109 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationIntrapersonal and interpersonal processes of social exclusion
Kawamoto, T., Ura, M., & Nittono, H. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00062 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
ACORN group, social class, and child health.
Morgan, M., & Chinn, S. (1983) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.37.3.196 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Miller, A. B., Adams, L. M., Esposito-Smythers, C. L., Thompson, R., & Proctor, L. J. (2014) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.10.009 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Dion, J., Matte‐Gagné, C., Daigneault, I., Blackburn, M.-È., Hébert, M., McDuff, P., Auclair, J., Veillette, S., & Perron, M. (2015) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.074 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
5-HTTLPR–environment interplay and its effects on neural reactivity in adolescents
Walsh, N., Dalgleish, T., Dunn, V. J., Abbott, R., Clair, M. S., Owens, M., Fairchild, G. F., Kerslake, W. S., Hiscox, L. V., Passamonti, L., et al. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.067 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Walsh, 2010, Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 11, 27
- Wager, 2017, bioRxiv
- 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pfeifer, J. H., & Allen, N. B. (2021) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.09.002 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fritz, J., Stretton, J., Askelund, A. D., Schweizer, S., Walsh, N. D., Elzinga, B. M., Goodyer, I. M., Wilkinson, P. O., & van Harmelen, A.-L.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- Leiden University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Fritz, Jessica
- ORCID
- Venue
- Development and Psychopathology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-03-21
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 411-423
- ISSN
- 0954-5794 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2198
- PMC
- PMC7260057
- OpenAlex
- W2910607058
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Development and Psychopathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (publishedVersion)
- UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Open Science Framework
- Apollo
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (074296, 095844/Z/11/Z, 209127/A/17/Z, 209127, 095844)
- Royal Society (DH150176)
- Medical Research Council (1800905)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Keywords
- childhood adversity, resilience, social rejection, social feedback, adolescent friendships, family social support, mood, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, brain development, mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Affect, Child, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Psychological Distance, Friends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review