Cited by 363Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Maternal buffering of human amygdala-prefrontal circuitry during childhood but not during adolescence

Open access
Gee, Dylan G., Gabard-Durnam, Laurel, Telzer, Eva H., Humphreys, Kathryn L., Goff, Bonnie, Shapiro, Mor, Flannery, Jessica, Lumian, Daniel S. +3 more·2014·Psychological Science

Abstract

Mature amygdala-prefrontal circuitry regulates affect in adulthood but shows protracted development. In altricial and semialtricial species, caregivers provide potent affect regulation when mature neurocircuitry is absent. The present investigation examined a potential mechanism through which caregivers provide regulatory influences in childhood. Children, but not adolescents, showed evidence of maternal buffering, such that maternal stimuli suppressed amygdala reactivity. In the absence of maternal stimuli, children exhibited immature amygdala-prefrontal connectivity. However, in the presence of maternal stimuli, children’s connectivity was more mature, resembling adolescents’ connectivity. Children showed improved affect-related regulation in the presence of their mothers. Individual differences emerged, with greater maternal influence on amygdala-prefrontal circuitry associated with stronger mother-child relationships and maternal modulation of behavioral regulation. These findings suggest a neural mechanism through which caregivers modulate children’s regulatory behavior by inducing more mature connectivity and buffering against heightened reactivity. Maternal buffering in childhood, but not adolescence, suggests that childhood may be a sensitive period for amygdala-prefrontal development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797614550878

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early environmental factors, such as early caregiving or the lack thereof, modulate the timing and course of emotional development.

    “A comprehensive set of literature reviews (9, 32, 78, 83–86) details the hypothesis that early environmental factors, e.g., early caregiving or the lack thereof, modulate the timing and course of emotional development.”

    From The Stress Acceleration Hypothesis of Nightmares (2017) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says prolonged maternal separation may accelerate amygdala–prefrontal development, while maternal presence can support regulation during a possible sensitive period in childhood. This supports the proposed role of early caregiving and its absence in emotional development. However, the cited paper is an original investigation, not one of the literature reviews described in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The maternal stimulus phasically induced an adult-like pattern of frontoamygdala negative connectivity in children, such that children resembled adolescents when viewing their mother's face.

    “Moreover, the maternal stimulus phasically induced an adult-like pattern of frontoamygdala negative connectivity in children, such that children resembled adolescents when viewing their mother's face (Fig. 5b).”

    From The impact of developmental timing for stress and recovery (2015) · cites this paper as Gee et al., 2014

  • The maternal stimulus buffered against heightened amygdala reactivity in childhood, but stopped being effective in adolescence.

    “Findings revealed that the maternal stimulus buffered against heightened amygdala reactivity in childhood, but stopped being effective in adolescence (Fig. 5a).”

    From The impact of developmental timing for stress and recovery (2015) · cites this paper as Gee et al., 2014

  • Children with greater neural modulation by the mother had lower separation anxiety and more secure attachment, as well as better emotion regulation in their mother's presence.

    “Individual difference analyses suggested that children with greater neural modulation by the mother had lower separation anxiety and more secure attachment, as well as better emotion regulation in their mother's presence.”

    From The impact of developmental timing for stress and recovery (2015) · cites this paper as Gee et al., 2014

  • Children displayed evidence of maternal buffering of behavior, such that they performed with enhanced affect-related regulatory behavior in the presence of their mother compared with a stranger.

    “Children also displayed evidence of maternal buffering of behavior, such that they performed with enhanced affect-related regulatory behavior in the presence of their mother compared with a stranger.”

    From The impact of developmental timing for stress and recovery (2015) · cites this paper as Gee et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gee, D. G., Gabard-Durnam, L., Telzer, E. H., Humphreys, K. L., Goff, B., Shapiro, M., Flannery, J., Lumian, D. S., Fareri, D. S., Caldera, C., & Tottenham, N.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Tottenham, Nim
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2014-10-03
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
2067-2078
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2109186297
Cited by
363
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 11
FWCI
22.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH078105, R01MH091864)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
amygdala, prefrontal cortex, amygdala-prefrontal connectivity, emotion regulation, child development, adolescence, mother-child relationship, behavioral regulation, sensitive period, neural development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Age Factors, Amygdala, Brain Mapping, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mothers, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review