Cited by 290Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and AggressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

A quantitative meta-analysis of functional imaging studies of social rejection

Open access
Cacioppo, Stephanie, Frum, Chris, Asp, Erik, Weiss, Robin M., Lewis, James W., Cacioppo, John T.·2013·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Early neuroimaging studies using Cyberball suggested that social rejection activated the pain matrix, as identified in studies of physical pain. However, these early studies were characterized by small sample sizes. Our statistical multi-level kernel density analysis (MKDA) of Cyberball neuroimaging studies with 244 participants fails to support the claim that social rejection operates on the same pain matrix as nociceptive stimuli, questioning whether social pain is more figurative or literal. We also performed an MKDA of the neuroimaging studies of reliving a romantic rejection to test whether the pain matrix was activated if the rejection were more meaningful. Results again failed to support the notion that rejection activates the neural matrix identified in studies of physical pain. Reliving an unwanted rejection by a romantic partner was significantly characterized by activation within and beyond the "Cyberball" brain network, suggesting that the neural correlates of social pain are more complex than previously thought.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep02027

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • fMRI studies using Cyberball have identified a network of brain regions involved in processing exclusion-related distress, most consistently the ACC, anterior insula, and vlPFC.

    “Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies using the Cyberball game have identified a network of brain regions involved in processing exclusion-related distress of which three regions are most consistently found: the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), the anterior insula and the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC)”

    From Chronic Childhood Peer Rejection is Associated with Heightened Neural Responses to Social Exclusion During Adolescence (2016) · cites this paper as Cacioppo et al. 2013

    The Results (page unavailable) identify the anterior insula and left ACC among three regions reliably recruited during Cyberball rejection. The third is the left inferior orbito-frontal cortex, not the vlPFC named in the claim. The Discussion (page unavailable) says the network may reflect distress, among other possibilities, rather than establishing it specifically as a distress-processing network. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neither the current meta-analysis nor Cacioppo and colleagues' (2013) prior meta-analysis identified involvement of the dACC.

    “neither meta-analysis identified involvement of the dACC despite the sizeable focus on the region within the literature on social pain.”
  • There is minimal overlap between the current meta-analysis findings and Cacioppo and colleagues' (2013) prior meta-analysis of the Cyberball literature.

    “It is interesting to note that there is minimal overlap between our findings and Cacioppo and colleagues’ (2013) prior meta-analysis of the Cyberball literature.”
  • Cacioppo and colleagues' (2013) prior meta-analysis included 12 studies, nine of which overlapped with the current sample.

    “Cacioppo and colleagues only included 12 studies (nine of which overlapped with our sample)”
  • The current findings primarily lie within the subgenual portion of the ACC, while Cacioppo and colleagues' (2013) findings fall more rostrally (primarily anterior rostral medial PFC).

    “our findings primarily lie within the subgenual portion, while their findings fall more rostrally (in what we consider to be primarily anterior rostral medial PFC).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cacioppo, S., Frum, C., Asp, E., Weiss, R. M., Lewis, J. W., & Cacioppo, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Cacioppo, Stephanie
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2013-06-19
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
2027-2027
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086899306
Cited by
290
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Chicago
  • West Virginia University
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (128599, PP00_1_128599/1)
  • National Institutes of Health (W81XWH)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (E15524)
  • National Center for Research Resources
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
social rejection, social pain, pain matrix, Cyberball, nociception, romantic rejection, meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Psychological Distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review