Cited by 926Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI): A Practical Test for Cross-Cultural Epidemiological Studies of Dementia

Open access

Abstract

The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) has a score range of 0 to 100 and provides quantitative assessment on attention, concentration, orientation, short-term memory, long-term memory, language abilities, visual construction, list-generating fluency, abstraction, and judgment. Scores of the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Modified Mini-Mental State Test, and the Hasegawa Dementia Screening Scale can also be estimated from subsets of the CASI items. Pilot testing conducted in Japan and in the United States has demonstrated its cross-cultural applicability and its usefulness in screening for dementia, in monitoring disease progression, and in providing profiles of cognitive impairment. Typical administration time is 15 to 20 minutes. Record form, manual, videotape of test administration, and quizzes to qualify potential users on the administration and scoring of the CASI are available upon request.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610294001602

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) was used to screen for dementia at study entry and each biennial study visit.

    “The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) was used to screen for dementia at study entry and each biennial study visit.21”

    From Cumulative Use of Strong Anticholinergics and Incident Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study (2015) · cites this paper as [21]

    The paper describes CASI as a dementia-screening instrument (Abstract) and reports its use in epidemiological studies (Discussion). It does not say that CASI was administered at study entry and every biennial visit; the Method section instead mentions annual return visits for one pilot-study group without establishing that screening schedule. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kukull, 1992, Increased platelet membrane fluidity as a diagnostic marker for Alzheimer’s disease: A test in population-based cases and controls, Annals of Neurology, 42, 607, 10.1212/WNL.42.3.607 · DOI
  2. Pauker, 1988, Constructing overlapping cell tables to maximize the clinical usefulness of normative test data: Rationale and an example from neuropsychology, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 930, 10.1002/1097-4679(198811)44:6<930::AID-JCLP2270440613>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  3. Teng, 1987, The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 314

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Teng, E. L., Hasegawa, K., Homma, A., Imai, Y., Larson, E., Graves, A., Sugimoto, K., Yamaguchi, T., Sasaki, H., Chiu, D., & White, L. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP)
  • Radiation Effects Research Foundation (JP)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
45-58
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116698967
Cited by
926
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 42
FWCI
5.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
dementia screening, cognitive impairment assessment, cross-cultural applicability, Mini-Mental State Examination, disease progression monitoring, cognitive profile, test administration and scoring
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Dementia, Female, Humans, Japan, Male, Mass Screening, Mental Status Schedule, Neuropsychological Tests, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Reference Values, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review