Cited by 91Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurological Complications and Syndromes

Neural Dysfunction in Postpartum Depression:An fMRI Pilot Study

Silverman, Michael E., Loudon, Holly, Safier, Michal, Protopopescu, Xenia, Leiter, Gila, Liu, Xun, Goldstein, Martin·2007·CNS Spectrums

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With approximately 4 million births each year in the United States, an estimated 760,000 women annually suffer from a clinically significant postpartum depressive illness. Yet even though the relationship between psychiatric disorders and the postpartum period has been documented since the time of Hippocrates, fewer than half of all these cases are recognized. OBJECTIVE: Because postpartum depression (PPD), the most common complication of childbearing, remains poorly characterized, and its etiology remains unclear, we attempted to address a critical gap in the mechanistic understanding of PPD by probing its systems-level neuropathophysiology, in the context of a specific neurobiological model of fronto-limbic-striatal function. METHODS: Using emotionally valenced word probes, with linguistic semantic specificity within an integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) protocol, we investigated emotional processing, behavioral regulation, and their interaction (functions of clinical relevance to PPD), in the context of fronto-limbic-striatal function. RESULTS: We observed attenuated activity in posterior orbitofrontal cortex for negative versus neutral stimuli with greater PPD symptomatology, increased amygdala activity in response to negative words in those without PPD symptomotology, and attenuated striatum activation to positive word conditions with greater PPD symptomotology. CONCLUSION: Identifying the functional neuroanatomical profile of brain systems involved in the regulation of emotion and behavior in the postpartum period will not only assist in determining whether the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition psychiatric diagnostic specifier of PPD has an associated, unique, functional neuroanatomical profile, but a neurobiological characterization in relation to asymptomatic (postpartum non-depressed) control subjects, will also increase our understanding of the affective disorder spectrum, shed additional light on the possible mechanism(s) responsible for PPD and provide a necessary foundation for the development of more targeted, biologically based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for PPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1092852900015595

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A small study of eight women revealed reduced activity in the posterior orbitofrontal cortex in response to negative words in women with postpartum depression compared to healthy postpartum women.

    “A small study (n=8) revealed reduced activity in the posterior OFC in response to negative words in women with PPD compared to healthy postpartum women (Silverman et al., 2007).”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Silverman et al., 2007

  • In mothers attending to non-infant negative emotional stimuli, postpartum depression versus healthy status and greater postpartum depression severity were associated with reduced activity in the amygdala to fearful and threatening faces or negatively valenced words.

    “Two existing studies (Moses-Kolko et al., 2010; Silverman et al., 2007) of mothers attending to non-infant negative emotional stimuli found that PPD versus healthy status and greater PPD severity was associated with reduced activity in the amygdala to fearful and threatening faces or negatively valenced words.”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Silverman et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silverman, M. E., Loudon, H., Safier, M., Protopopescu, X., Leiter, G., Liu, X., & Goldstein, M.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Venue
CNS Spectrums
Published
2007-11
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
853-862
ISSN
  • 1092-8529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2165-6509
OpenAlex
W2143768387
Cited by
91
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CNS Spectrums (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (MO1RR00071, M01RR000071)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
Keywords
postpartum depression, emotional processing, behavioral regulation, orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, striatum, neuropathophysiology, maternal mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Striatum, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Reaction Time, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review