Cited by 97Schizophrenia research and treatmentAction Observation and SynchronizationFace Recognition and Perception

Empathic deficits in schizophrenia: the potential role of rapid facial mimicry

VARCIN, KANDICE J., BAILEY, PHOEBE E., HENRY, JULIE D.·2010·Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Abstract

Emotional facial expressions evoke rapid, involuntary, and covert facial reactions in the perceiver that are consistent with the emotional valence of the observed expression. These responses are believed to be an important low-level mechanism contributing to the experience of empathy, which some have argued rely on a simulation mechanism subserved by the human mirror neuron system (MNS). Because schizophrenia is associated with pervasive social cognitive difficulties which have been linked to structural abnormalities in the MNS network, the aim of the present study was to provide the first assessment of how rapid facial mimicry reactions (within 1000 ms poststimulus onset) are affected in schizophrenia. Activity in the corrugator supercilii and zygomaticus major muscle regions was quantified using electromyography while individuals with schizophrenia (n = 25) and controls (n = 25) viewed images of happy and angry facial expressions. In contrast to controls, individuals with schizophrenia demonstrated atypical facial mimicry reactions which were not associated with any clinical features of the disorder. These data provide evidence for a low-level disruption that may be contributing to empathizing deficits in schizophrenia and are discussed in relation to neuropsychological models of empathy and schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1355617710000329

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because people with schizophrenia have varied emotion-processing difficulties, it is uncertain whether impaired imitation of emotional stimuli reflects imitation itself or other emotional processes.

    “Third, because patients display a variety of problems in processing of emotions, 46 it is unclear whether a deficit in voluntary or automatic imitation of emotional stimuli 11,12,47,48 would reflect a specific impairment in imitation, or other aspects of emotion processing”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VARCIN, K. J., BAILEY, P. E., & HENRY, J. D.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
VARCIN, KANDICE J.
Venue
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Published
2010-04-07
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
621-629
ISSN
  • 1355-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7661
OpenAlex
W2164284234
Cited by
97
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of New South Wales
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
schizophrenia, facial mimicry, empathy deficits, mirror neuron system, social cognition, corrugator supercilii, zygomaticus major, facial expressions, electromyography, emotional facial expressions
MeSH terms
Adult, Electromyography, Empathy, Facial Expression, Facial Muscles, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality Disorders, Photic Stimulation, Schizophrenia, Statistics as Topic, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review