Cited by 131Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactSynthesis and properties of polymers

Reconstructing the Composition of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Contemporary Aqueous Film-Forming Foams

Open access
Ruyle, Bridger J., Thackray, Colin P., McCord, James P., Strynar, Mark J., Mauge-Lewis, Kevin A., Fenton, Suzanne E., Sunderland, Elsie M.·2021·Environmental Science & Technology Letters

Abstract

Hundreds of public water systems across the United States have been contaminated by the use of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) during firefighting and training activities. Prior work shows AFFF contain hundreds of polyfluoroalkyl precursors missed by standard methods. However, the most abundant precursors in AFFF remain uncertain, and mixture contents are confidential business information, hindering proactive management of PFAS exposure risks. Here, we develop and apply a novel method (Bayesian inference) for reconstructing the fluorinated chain lengths, manufacturing origin, and concentrations of oxidizable precursors obtained from the total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay that is generally applicable to all aqueous samples. Results show virtually all (median 104 ± 19%) extractable organofluorine (EOF) in contemporary and legacy AFFF consists of targeted compounds and oxidizable precursors, 90% of which are 6:2 fluorotelomers in contemporary products. Using high-resolution mass spectrometry, we further resolved the 6:2 fluorotelomers to assign the identity of 14 major compounds, yielding a priority list that accounts for almost all detectable PFAS in contemporary AFFF. This combination of methods can accurately assign the total PFAS mass attributable to AFFF in any aqueous sample with differentiation of gross precursor classes and identification of major precursor species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00798

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the PFAS at AFFF-contaminated sites consists of precursors that can transform into terminal compounds of known health concern but are omitted from standard analytical methods.

    “Much of the PFAS at these sites consist of precursors that can transform into terminal compounds of known health concern but are omitted from standard analytical methods.”
  • 3M AFFF manufactured prior to 2001 contained hundreds of precursors that accounted for >50% of the total PFAS.

    “For example, AFFF manufactured by 3M prior to 2001 (3M AFFF) contained hundreds of precursors that accounted for >50% of the total PFAS.5−7”
  • 6:2 fluorotelomer compounds comprise >90% of PFAS in contemporary non-3M AFFF.

    “This class of precursors comprises >90% of PFAS in contemporary non-3M AFFF.6”
  • Past work showed that EOF concentrations provide a good proxy for total PFAS in AFFF and range between (850-900) ×10^6 nM F in the 3M product.

    “Past work showed that EOF concentrations provide a good proxy for total PFAS in AFFF and range between (850–900) ×106 nM F in the 3M product.6”
  • PFOA is present in 3M AFFF but is not a major biotransformation endpoint for sulfonamido precursors.

    “The other major terminal PFAS in groundwater was PFOA (C7 PFCA; 17 ± 8% of total PFAS), which is present in 3M AFFF but is not a major biotransformation endpoint for sulfonamido precursors.5,6,24”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruyle, B. J., Thackray, C. P., McCord, J. P., Strynar, M. J., Mauge-Lewis, K. A., Fenton, S. E., & Sunderland, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Ruyle, Bridger J.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2020-11-04
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
59-65
ISSN
2328-8930 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097197566
Cited by
131
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P42ES027706, Z0ES102785)
  • U.S. Department of Defense (SERDP ER18-1280)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Synthesis and properties of polymers
Keywords
aqueous film-forming foam, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, fluorotelomers, Bayesian inference, total oxidizable precursor assay

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review