Cited by 259Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluorine in Organic ChemistryChemical Analysis and Environmental Impact

Distribution and effects of branched versus linear isomers of PFOA, PFOS, and PFHxS: A review of recent literature

Schulz, Katarina, Silva, Marcia R., Klaper, Rebecca·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Perfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) have come to attention recently due to their widespread presence in the environment, recalcitrance, and potential negative health associations. Because of the long-term production of PFAS using ECF, which created branched isomers as byproducts in addition to the intended linear product, branched isomers of PFAS account for a significant portion of PFAS load in the environment. The distribution of isomers is not consistent in the environment, however. Geographic location appears to be a major factor in determining the isomer makeup of PFAS in surface and groundwater as well as in humans and animals. This is largely to differences in production methods; a region that produced PFAS via ECF for many years would have a higher ratio of branched isomers than one that produces PFAS using telomerization. In addition, the different structures of branched PFAS isomers as compared to linear PFAS appear to affect transport in the environment. Research suggests that linear PFAS sorb preferentially to soil and sediments, whereas branched isomers are more likely to remain in water. The higher polarity of the branched structure explains this difference. Studies in humans and animals show that most animals preferentially accumulate the linear PFOS isomer, but humans appear to preferentially accumulate the branched isomers as they are often found in human serum at percentages higher than that of ECF product. In addition, some studies have indicated that linear and branched PFAS isomers have some unique negative health associations. Very few studies, however, account for linear and branched PFAS separately.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139186

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schulz, K., Silva, M. R., & Klaper, R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Corresponding author
Klaper, Rebecca
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
733
Pages
139186
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3022454461
Cited by
259
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (IIP-1540032)
  • Marquette University (IIP-1540010)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, PFHxS, telomerization, groundwater contamination, surface water contamination, bioaccumulation, environmental transport, health effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review