Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Activity and Selectivity Control in CO2 Electroreduction to Multicarbon Products over CuOx Catalysts via Electrolyte Design

Gao, Dunfeng, McCrum, Ian T., Deo, Shyam, Choi, Yong-Wook, Scholten, Fabian, Wan, Weiming, Chen, Jingguang G., Janik, Michael J., Roldan Cuenya, Beatriz·2018·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The CO 2 electroreduction reaction (CO 2 RR) to chemicals and fuels is of both fundamental and practical significance, since it would lead to a more efficient storage of renewable energy while closing the carbon cycle. Here we report enhanced activity and selectivity for the CO 2 RR to multicarbon hydrocarbons and alcohols (∼69% Faradaic efficiency and −45.5 mA cm –2 partial current density for C 2+ at −1.0 V vs RHE) over O 2 -plasma-activated Cu catalysts via electrolyte design. Increasing the size of the alkali-metal cations in the electrolyte, in combination with the presence of subsurface oxygen species which favor their adsorption, significantly improved C–C coupling on CuO x electrodes. The coexistence of Cs + and I – induced drastic restructuring of the CuO x surface, the formation of shaped particles containing stable CuI species, and a more favorable stabilization of the reaction intermediates and concomitant high C 2+ selectivity. This work, combining both experiment and density functional theory, provides insights into the active sites and reaction mechanism of oxide-derived Cu catalysts for the CO 2 RR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b02587

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Gao, D., McCrum, I. T., Deo, S., Choi, Y.-W., Scholten, F., Wan, W., Chen, J. G., Janik, M. J., & Roldan Cuenya, B.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-09-11
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
10012-10020
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890912281
Cited by
260
References
15
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.