Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 389

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heterogeneous Catalysis by Polyoxometalates in Metal–Organic Frameworks

Samaniyan, Maryam, Mirzaei, Masoud, Khajavian, Ruhollah, Eshtiagh-Hosseini, Hossein, Streb, Carsten·2019·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The embedding of molecular metal oxides, or polyoxometalates (POMs), in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) opens new research avenues in catalysis and beyond. This review explores the host–guest chemistry of POMs embedded in MOF hosts and discusses the synergism of the resulting composites for heterogeneous catalysis. The review focuses on well-established and well-studied classes of POMs, such as Keggin and Wells–Dawson anions, and well-researched MOFs, including the MIL, UiO, and NENU families. Outstanding examples of synergistic catalytic activity between the POM and MOF are described, and key performance parameters, including POM localization, pore size and pore structure, as well as particle size effects are described for technologically important catalytic processes. In addition to thermal catalysis, we discuss the use of POM@MOF composites for electro- and photocatalysis with an emphasis on energy conversion systems. Finally, we provide an outlook on emerging areas where POM@MOF composites could lead to new catalytic reactivity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.9b03439

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Samaniyan, M., Mirzaei, M., Khajavian, R., Eshtiagh-Hosseini, H., & Streb, C.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2019-09-27
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
10174-10191
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2976584667
Cited by
389
References
92
FWCI
14.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.