Cited by 636biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesBlock Copolymer Self-AssemblyAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable

Hillmyer, Marc A., Tolman, William B.·2014·Accounts of Chemical Research

Abstract

Nearly all polymers are derived from nonrenewable fossil resources, and their disposal at their end of use presents significant environmental problems. Nonetheless, polymers are ubiquitous, key components in myriad technologies and are simply indispensible for modern society. An important overarching goal in contemporary polymer research is to develop sustainable alternatives to "petro-polymers" that have competitive performance properties and price, are derived from renewable resources, and may be easily and safely recycled or degraded. Aliphatic polyesters are particularly attractive targets that may be prepared in highly controlled fashion by ring-opening polymerization of bioderived lactones. However, property profiles of polyesters derived from single monomers (homopolymers) can limit their applications, thus demanding alternative strategies. One such strategy is to link distinct polymeric segments in an A-B-A fashion, with A and B chosen to be thermodynamically incompatible so that they can self-organize on a nanometer-length scale and adopt morphologies that endow them with tunable properties. For example, such triblock copolymers can be useful as thermoplastic elastomers, in pressure sensitive adhesive formulations, and as toughening modifiers. Inspired by the tremendous utility of petroleum-derived styrenic triblock copolymers, we aimed to develop syntheses and understand the structure-property profiles of sustainable alternatives, focusing on all renewable and all r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ar500121d

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hillmyer, M. A., & Tolman, W. B.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hillmyer, Marc A.
  • Tolman, William B.
Venue
Accounts of Chemical Research
Published
2014-05-22
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
2390-2396
ISSN
  • 0001-4842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4898
OpenAlex
W2071862021
Cited by
635
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 4
FWCI
14.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accounts of Chemical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSF Office of the Director (CHE-1136607)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Keywords
triblock copolymers, polylactic acid, menthol, ε-caprolactone, lactide, ring-opening polymerization, thermoplastic elastomers, microphase separation, hydrolytic degradation, pressure-sensitive adhesives, nucleating agents, α-methylene-γ-butyrolactones, polycaprolactone, polyhydroxybutyrate, biodegradable polymers, bio-based polymers, structure-property relationships, crystallization kinetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review