Cited by 267

Cognitive–behavioral treatment of anxiety disorders in children: Long-term (6-year) follow-up.

Barrett, Paula M., Duffy, Amanda L., Dadds, Mark R., Rapee, Ronald M.·2001·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Authors evaluated the long-term effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for childhood anxiety disorders. Fifty-two clients (aged 14 to 21 years) who had completed treatment an average of 6.17 years earlier were reassessed using diagnostic interviews, clinician ratings, and self- and parent-report measures. Results indicated that 85.7% no longer fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for any anxiety disorder. On a majority of other measures, gains made at 12-month follow-up were maintained. Furthermore, CBT and CBT plus family management were equally effective at long-term follow-up. These findings support the long-term clinical utility of CBT in treating children and adolescents suffering from anxiety disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.69.1.135

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is an absence of data indicating whether sequencing of treatment impacts treatment satisfaction, well-being, peer relationships, parent and family functioning, school functioning, or comorbid psychiatric symptoms.

    “Complicating the selection of initial treatment is the absence of data indicating whether sequencing of treatment impacts treatment satisfaction, well-being, peer relationships, parent and family functioning, school functioning, or comorbid psychiatric symptoms [5, 42–44].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, P. M., Duffy, A. L., Dadds, M. R., & Rapee, R. M.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2001
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
135-141
ISSN
  • 1939-2117
  • 0022-006X
Cited by
267
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review