Cited by 2,309Education, Achievement, and GiftednessGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation.

Multon, Karen D., Brown, Steven D., Lent, Robert W.·1991·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multon and Brown found that the overall effect size of self-efficacy on performance was .38, accounting for about 14% of variance in academic performance.

    “They found that the overall effect size of self-efficacy on performance was .38,thus students' self-efficacy beliefs accounted for about 14% of the variance in their academic performance.”
  • Multon and Brown found that the effect size of self-efficacy on persistence was .34, accounting for approximately 12% of variance in students' persistence.

    “Similarly, the effect size of self-efficacy on persistence was found to be .34,thus accounting for approximately 12% of the variance in students' persistence.”
  • Multon and Brown's meta-analysis found that self-efficacy accounted for approximately 14% of the variance in mathematical achievement and hypothesized that self-efficacy and performance accomplishments possessed a reciprocal relationship, with each positively affecting the other.

    “Multon and Brown's (1991) metaanalysis found that self-efficacy accounted for approximately 14% or the variance in mathematical achievement and hypothesized that self-efficacy and performance accomplishments possessed a reciprocal relationship, with each positively affecting the other (Schunk et al., 2008).”
  • Robust self-efficacy promotes active learning strategies, intrinsic motivation, and deep engagement that produce achievement gains.

    “Robust self-efficacy promotes active learning strategies, intrinsic motivation, and deep engagement that produce achievement gains (Cleary & Zimmerman, 2006;Multon et al., 1991;Richardson et al., 2012).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Multon, K. D., Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
1991-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
30-38
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2039840987
Cited by
2,309
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 104 · 2021: 101 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 112 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 157 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 110 · 2013: 120 · 2012: 130
FWCI
13.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
self-efficacy, educational outcomes, academic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review