The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex Differences in Intrinsic Aptitude for Mathematics and Science?: A Critical Review.
Abstract
This article considers 3 claims that cognitive sex differences account for the differential representation of men and women in high-level careers in mathematics and science: (a) males are more focused on objects from the beginning of life and therefore are predisposed to better learning about mechanical systems; (b) males have a profile of spatial and numerical abilities producing greater aptitude for mathematics; and (c) males are more variable in their cognitive abilities and therefore predominate at the upper reaches of mathematical talent. Research on cognitive development in human infants, preschool children, and students at all levels fails to support these claims. Instead, it provides evidence that mathematical and scientific reasoning develop from a set of biologically based cognitive capacities that males and females share. These capacities lead men and women to develop equal talent for mathematics and science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis
Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/bf00287729 · Cited by 545
Cited by
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109 · Cited by 3,150
Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018053 · Cited by 1,630
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259
Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014412 · Cited by 957
Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610377342 · Cited by 878
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001 · Cited by 837
“grammed to show more interest in people, while male infants are more object-focused, citing methodological limitations and contradictory findings (Spelke, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialMathematics anxiety: what have we learned in 60 years?
Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508 · Cited by 811
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049 · Cited by 646
Brain plasticity through the life span: Learning to learn and action video games
Bavelier, D., Green, C. S., Pouget, A., & Schrater, P. (2012) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-152832 · Cited by 541
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057988 · Cited by 398
The changing career trajectories of new parents in STEM
Cech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1810862116 · Cited by 387
The relationship between math anxiety and math performance: a meta-analytic investigation
Zhang, J., Zhao, N., & Kong, Q. P. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613 · Cited by 347
Problems in the pipeline: stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004 · Cited by 343
Twenty Years of Stereotype Threat Research: A Review of Psychological Mediators
Pennington, C. R., Heim, D., Levy, A. R., & Larkin, D. T. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146487 · Cited by 324
Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention
Martin, A. J. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003 · Cited by 293
Sex Differences in Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Carter, A. S., Black, D. O., Tewani, S., Connolly, C. E., Kadlec, M. B., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2007) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0331-7 · Cited by 262
Smith, J. L., Lewis, K. L., Hawthorne, L., & Hodges, S. D. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212468332 · Cited by 256
Barres, B. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/442133a · Cited by 241
Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000012 · Cited by 209
Sex Differences in Spatial Cognition: Advancing the Conversation
Levine, S. C., Foley, A., Lourenco, S., Ehrlich, S., & Ratliff, K. (2016) · WIREs Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1380 · Cited by 209
Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2013) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797613478618 · Cited by 178
“…for increasingly less variation in psychological outcomes as children develop, and variation in environmental experiences will account for increasingly more of the variation in psychological outcomes (e.g., see Fryer & Levitt, 2006; Spelke, 2005; cf. McGue, Bouchard, Iacono, & Lykken, 1993).”
London, B., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2011.614166 · Cited by 154
Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done?
Stewart-Williams, S., & Halsey, L. G. (2021) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/0890207020962326 · Cited by 117
Do the maths: An analysis of the gender gap in mathematics in Africa
Dickerson, A., McIntosh, S., & Valente, C. (2015) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.02.005 · Cited by 89
Ausubel’s meaningful learning re-visited
Bryce, T. G. K., & Blown, E. J. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04440-4 · Cited by 84
Considerations Relating to the Study of Group Differences in Intelligence
Hunt, E., & Carlson, J. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00037.x · Cited by 64
The Role of Social and Ability Belonging in Men’s and Women’s pSTEM Persistence
Banchefsky, S., Lewis, K. L., & Ito, T. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02386 · Cited by 64
Maternal depression and sex differences shape the infants’ trajectories of cognitive development
Azak, S. (2012) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.017 · Cited by 48
Hausdorf, P. A., & Robie, C. (2018) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12226 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Spelke, E. S.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 950-958
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2088645057
- Cited by
- 751
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
