Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reducing Playground Bullying and Supporting Beliefs: An Experimental Trial of the Steps to Respect Program.

Frey, Karin S., Hirschstein, Miriam K., Snell, Jennie L., Edstrom, Leihua Van Schoiack, MacKenzie, Elizabeth P., Broderick, Carole J.·2005·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Six schools were randomly assigned to a multilevel bullying intervention or a control condition. Children in Grades 3-6 (N=1,023) completed pre- and posttest surveys of behaviors and beliefs and were rated by teachers. Observers coded playground behavior of a random subsample (n=544). Hierarchical analyses of changes in playground behavior revealed declines in bullying and argumentative behavior among intervention-group children relative to control-group children, increases in agreeable interactions, and a trend toward reduced destructive bystander behavior. Those in the intervention group reported enhanced bystander responsibility, greater perceived adult responsiveness, and less acceptance of bullying/aggression than those in the control group. Self-reported aggression did not differ between the groups. Implications for future research on the development and prevention of bullying are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.479

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1080/140438501317205538 · DOI
  3. 10.1006/jado.1999.0240 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cohen, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  5. Coie, 1998, The development of aggression and antisocial behavior., Vol. 3, 779
  6. 2001, Steps to Respect: A bullying prevention program.
  7. Connolly. Dating experiences of bullies in early adolescence. Child Maltreatment 5 299 2000 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Craig, 2000, Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom, School Psychology International, 21, 22, 10.1177/0143034300211002 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dietsch, 2000, Beliefs and Behaviors Survey.
  10. 10.2307/1130743 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dodge, 1990, On the development of aggressive dyadic relationships in boys' peer groups., Human Development, 33, 260, 10.1159/000276523 · doi:10.1159/000276523
  12. 10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.996 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.996
  13. Eisenberg, 1998, Prosocial development., Vol. 3, 701
  14. Endresen, 2001, Self-reported empathy in Norwegian adolescents: Sex differences, age trends, and relationship to bullying., 147, 10.1037/10433-007 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/1467-9507.00070 · DOI
  16. Eslea, 1998, The long-term effectiveness of anti-bullying work in primary schools., Educational Research, 40, 203, 10.1080/0013188980400208 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Espelage, 2003, Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here?, School Psychology Review, 32, 365, 10.1080/02796015.2003.12086206 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Espelage, 2001, Short-term stability and change of bullying in middle school students: An examination of demographic, psychosocial, and environmental correlates., Violence and Victims, 16, 411, 10.1891/0886-6708.16.4.411 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/1467-8624.00531 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.611 · DOI
  21. 10.1001/jama.277.20.1605 · doi:10.1001/jama.277.20.1605 · Paper page
  22. 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2005.00288.x · DOI
  23. 10.1017/S0021963099005545 · doi:10.1017/s0021963099005545 · Paper page
  24. 10.1111/1467-9507.00178 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.757 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hirschstein, (in press). Promoting behaviors and beliefs that reduce bullying: The Steps to Respect program.
  27. Hoover, 1992, Bullying: Perceptions of adolescent victims in the Midwestern USA., School Psychology International, 13, 5, 10.1177/0143034392131001 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.268 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.268 · Paper page
  29. 10.1037/0022-3514.72.2.408 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.2307/1130599 · doi:10.2307/1130599 · Paper page
  31. 10.1111/1467-9450.00295 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1017/S0954579497001065 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1111/1467-8624.00611 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Leff, 2003, Assessing the climate of the playground and lunchroom: Implications for bullying prevention programming., School Psychology Review, 32, 418, 10.1080/02796015.2003.12086209 · DOI
  35. 10.1001/jama.285.16.2094 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1006/jado.1999.0238 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Olweus, 1999, Sweden, Norway., 7
  38. Owens, 2000, It hurts a hell of a lot...": The effects of indirect aggression on teenage girls., School Psychology International, 21, 359, 10.1177/0143034300214002 · DOI
  39. Patterson, 1982, Coercive family process.
  40. 10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.360 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.360 · Paper page
  41. 10.1348/026151002166442 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.548 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.548 · Paper page
  43. Pepler, 1999, Understanding bullying from a dynamic systems perspective., 440
  44. Perry, 2001, Determinants of chronic victimization by peers: A review and new model of family influence., 73
  45. Rahey, 2002, Evaluation of an ecological program to reduce bullying in schools., Canadian Journal of Counselling, 36, 281
  46. 10.1023/A:1022181111368 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Rigby, 2002, A meta-evaluation of methods and approaches to reducing bullying in pre-schools and in early primary school in Australia.
  48. Rigby, 1991, Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes toward victims., The Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 615, 10.1080/00224545.1991.9924646 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:1<135::AID-AB11>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  50. 10.1006/jado.1999.0239 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1348/026151002166451 · DOI
  52. Schaie, 1977, On sequential strategies in developmental research: Description or explanation., Human Development, 18, 384, 10.1159/000271498 · DOI
  53. 10.1023/A:1005174831561 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.2307/1131467 · DOI
  55. 10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.580 · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.4.580 · Paper page
  56. 10.1023/A:1022991804210 · DOI
  57. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Smith, 1994, Tackling bullying in your school: A practical handbook for teachers., 10.4324/9780203425497 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Snell, 2000, Playground aggressors, targets and bystanders (PATAB). Unpublished training manual
  60. Snell, 2002, Bullying prevention in elementary schools: The importance of adult leadership, peer group support, and student social-emotional skills., 351
  61. 10.1006/jado.1999.0296 · DOI
  62. 10.1111/1467-9507.00083 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Tabachnick, 1996, Using multivariate statistics
  64. 10.1002/ab.80009 · DOI
  65. Walker, 1995, Walker-McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustment: Elementary version.
  66. Whitney, 1994, The Sheffield project: Methodology and findings., 20

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Edstrom, L. V. S., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2005
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
479-490
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2169035875
Cited by
306
References
6
FWCI
14.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reducing Playground Bullying and Supporting Beliefs: An Experimental Trial of the Steps to Respect Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.479
The paper
Frey, K. S., Hirschstein, M. K., Snell, J. L., Edstrom, L. V. S., MacKenzie, E. P., & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing Playground Bullying and Supporting Beliefs: An Experimental Trial of the Steps to Respect Program. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.479

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.