Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 733

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Universal Pre-K on Cognitive Development.

Gormley, William T., Gayer, Ted, Phillips, Deborah, Dawson, Brittany·2005·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

In this study of Oklahoma's universal pre-K program, the authors relied on a strict birthday eligibility criterion to compare "young" kindergarten children who just completed pre-K to "old" pre-K children just beginning pre-K. This regression-discontinuity design reduces the threat of selection bias. Their sample consisted of 1,567 pre-K children and 1,461 kindergarten children who had just completed pre-K. The authors estimated the impact of the pre-K treatment on Woodcock-Johnson Achievement test scores. The authors found test impacts of 3.00 points (0.79 of the standard deviation for the control group) for the Letter-Word Identification score, 1.86 points (0.64 of the standard deviation of the control group) for the Spelling score, and 1.94 points (0.38 of the standard deviation of the control group) for the Applied Problems score. Hispanic, Black, White, and Native American children all benefit from the program, as do children in diverse income brackets, as measured by school lunch eligibility status. The authors conclude that Oklahoma's universal pre-K program has succeeded in enhancing the school readiness of a diverse group of children.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.872

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1207/S15327671ESPR0802_2 · DOI
  2. Barnett, 2004, The state of preschool: 2004 state preschool yearbook.
  3. 10.2307/1602366 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barnett, 1998, Long-term effects on cognitive development and school success., 11
  5. 10.2307/1131410 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.1076921 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cook, 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings.
  8. Currie, 1995, Does Head Start make a difference?, The American Economic Review, 85, 341
  9. 10.1257/00028280260344560 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gilliam, 2004, What can be learned from state-funded preschool initiatives?: A data-based approach to the Head Start devolution debate., 477
  11. 10.1016/S0885-2006(01)00073-4 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Goodson, 1992, Analysis report: Predicting quality of early childhood classrooms. Observational Study of Early Childhood Programs.
  13. Gormley, 2005, Promoting school readiness in Oklahoma: An evaluation of Tulsa's pre-K program., The Journal of Human Resources, 40, 533, 10.3368/jhr.XL.3.533 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00092.x · DOI
  15. Henry, 2003, Report of the findings from the Early Childhood Study: 2001-02.
  16. Henry, 2001, Pre-K Longitudinal Study: Findings from the 1999-2000 School Year.
  17. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00653.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Love, (in press). Early Head Start and early development.
  19. Love, 2002, Making a difference in the lives of infants and toddlers and their families: The impacts of early Head Start (Report prepared for the Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services).
  20. Magnuson, 2004, Does prekindergarten improve school preparation and performance?, 10.3386/w10452 · DOI
  21. Mather, 2001, Examiner's manual, "Woodcock-Johnson Achievement Test-III.
  22. 10.1001/jama.277.2.126 · doi:10.1001/jama.277.2.126 · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/1467-8624.00617 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 1999, Child outcomes when child care center classes meet recommended standards for quality., American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1072, 10.2105/AJPH.89.7.1072 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/1467-9280.00438 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/1467-8624.00364 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2307/1131397 · DOI
  28. Pianta, (in press). The social ecology of the transition to school: Classrooms, families, and children.
  29. Ramey, 1992, Infant Health and Development Program for low birth weight, premature infants: Program elements, family participation, and child intelligence., Pediatrics, 89, 454, 10.1542/peds.89.3.454 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1207/S1532480XADS0401_1 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Schweinhart, 1993, The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 27., Vol. 10
  32. 2004, Prekindergarten: Four selected states expanded access by relying on schools and existing providers of early education and care to provide services.
  33. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00670.x · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gormley, W. T., Gayer, T., Phillips, D., & Dawson, B.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2005
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
872-884
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2121410521
Cited by
733
References
4
FWCI
159.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Universal Pre-K on Cognitive Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.872
The paper
Gormley, W. T., Gayer, T., Phillips, D., & Dawson, B. (2005). The Effects of Universal Pre-K on Cognitive Development. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.872

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.