Cited by 24Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Threat vs. Threat: Attention to Fear-Related Animals and Threatening Faces

Open access
Berdica, Elisa, Gerdes, Antje B. M., Bublatzky, Florian, White, Andrew J., Alpers, Georg W.·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

It is generally thought to be adaptive that fear relevant stimuli in the environment can capture and hold our attention; and in psychopathology attentional allocation is thought to be cue-specific. Such hypervigilance toward threatening cues or difficulty to disengage attention from threat has been demonstrated for a variety of stimuli, for example, toward evolutionary prepared animals or toward socially relevant facial expressions. Usually, specific stimuli have been examined in individuals with particular fears (e.g., animals in animal fearful and faces in socially fearful participants). However, different kinds of stimuli are rarely examined in one study. Thus, it is unknown how different categories of threatening stimuli compete for attention and how specific kinds of fears modulate these attentional processes. In this study, we used a free viewing paradigm: pairs of pictures with threat-related content (spiders or angry faces) or neutral content (butterflies or neutral faces) were presented side by side (i.e., spiders and angry faces, angry and neutral faces, spiders and butterflies, butterflies and neutral faces). Eye-movements were recorded while spider fearful, socially anxious, or non-anxious participants viewed the picture pairs. Results generally replicate the finding that unpleasant pictures more effectively capture attention in the beginning of a trial compared to neutral pictures. This effect was more pronounced in spider fearful participants: the higher the fear the quicker they were in looking at spiders. This was not the case for high socially anxious participants and pictures of angry faces. Interestingly, when presented next to each other, there was no preference in initial orientation for either spiders or angry faces. However, neutral faces were looked at more quickly than butterflies. Regarding sustained attention, we found no general preference for unpleasant pictures compared to neutral pictures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01154

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In specific phobia, eye-tracking studies have revealed that individuals with phobia present a hypervigilance-avoidance pattern characterised by accelerated detection of the feared stimulus, followed by rapid and sustained avoidance of it.

    “In the case of SP, thanks to the use of eye-tracking technology, some studies have revealed that individuals with phobia present a hypervigilance–avoidance pattern characterised by accelerated detection of the feared stimulus, followed by rapid and sustained avoidance of it.23 25 26”

    From Effectiveness of a projection-based augmented reality exposure system in treating cockroach phobia: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that spider-fearful participants looked at spiders more quickly as their fear increased, supporting accelerated detection. But the Discussion (page unavailable) reports no sustained-attention difference for spiders and does not establish the claimed rapid and sustained avoidance. The paper therefore supports the early hypervigilance component, not the full hypervigilance–avoidance pattern attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies that evaluated ocular movements during a free exploration task found the hypervigilance-avoidance pattern typically associated with patients with phobia.

    “Specifically, in the small animal phobia research field, studies that evaluated ocular movements during a free exploration task found the hypervigilance–avoidance pattern typically associated with patients with phobia.23 25 26”

    From Effectiveness of a projection-based augmented reality exposure system in treating cockroach phobia: Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Methods and Results describe eye movements during free viewing and show faster initial attention to spiders among more spider-fearful participants. But the Discussion reports no sustained-attention difference between threatening and neutral pictures, so this study does not establish the claimed hypervigilance–avoidance pattern. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berdica, E., Gerdes, A. B. M., Bublatzky, F., White, A. J., & Alpers, G. W.
Affiliations
University of Mannheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Alpers, Georg W.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-07-23
Volume
9
Pages
1154-1154
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2808688438
Cited by
24
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universität Mannheim
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
attentional capture, threat-related stimuli, spider phobia, social anxiety, angry faces, eye movements, sustained attention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review