Cited by 45Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Relation between cognitive and behavioral strategies and future change in common mental health problems across 18 years.

Open access
Zainal, Nur Hani, Newman, Michelle G.·2019·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and panic disorder (PD), constitute common mental disorders that may have chronic and disabling courses. Cognitive and behavioral theories posit that lack of engagement in certain strategies (goal persistence, self-mastery, positive reappraisal) increases vulnerability toward these disorders. Further, scar effect theories assert that experiencing more of these disorders may diminish engagement in such strategies within individuals across time. However, dynamic longitudinal associations between cognitive-behavioral strategies (CBS) and disorder counts across adulthood are not well understood. Using bivariate latent difference score models, this study aimed to test the dynamic trajectories between disorder counts and each CBS across 18 years. Participants were 3,294 community-dwelling adults ages 45.62 years (SD = 11.41, range = 20-74; 54.61% female) who took part in 3 waves of measurement spaced 9 years apart. Self-mastery, disorder counts, and their change were not significantly related. However, higher within-subject increase in goal persistence (but not self-mastery or positive reappraisal) led to greater future decline in disorder counts, but not vice versa. Last, within individuals, greater prior levels of goal persistence and positive reappraisal predicted larger subsequent reduction in disorder counts, and vice versa. The reciprocal, bidirectional associations between specific CBS (goal persistence, positive reappraisal) and disorder counts support both vulnerability and scar models of depression and anxiety. Treatments for MDD, GAD, and PD should attempt to enhance perseverance and optimism. Theoretical and clinical implications are further discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000428

Cites

93 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Barlow DH (Ed.). (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  2. Browne MW, & Cudeck R (1993). Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen KA & Long JS (Eds.), Testing equation models (pp. 136– 162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  3. Grimm KJ, Ram N, & Estabrook R (2017). Chapter 17: Multivariate latent change score models. In Grimm KJ, Ram N & Estabrook R (Eds.), Growth modeling: structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches (pp. 422– 444). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  4. Kline RB (2016a). Chapter 12: Global fit testing. In Kline RB (Ed.), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (pp. 262– 299). New York: The Guilford Press.
  5. Kline RB (2016b). Chapter 11: Estimation and local fit testing. In Kline RB (Ed.), Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (pp. 231– 261). New York: The Guilford Press.
  6. Rosseel Y (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of statistical software, 48, 1– 36.
  7. Ryff C, Almeida DM, Ayanian J, Carr DS, Cleary PD, Coe C, … Williams D (2017). Midlife in the United States (MIDUS 2), 2004–2006. ICPSR04652-v7 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2017–11-20. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR04652.v7 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zainal, N. H., & Newman, M. G.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2019-05
Volume
128
Issue
4
Pages
295-304
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2942625682
Cited by
45
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 18
FWCI
8.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Research Network
  • National Institute on Aging (P01-AG020166, U19-AG051426)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
cognitive-behavioral techniques, goal persistence, positive reappraisal, self-control, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, common mental disorders, vulnerability model, bidirectional relationship, longitudinal trajectories, middle-aged and older adults, optimism
MeSH terms
Optimism, Self-Management, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Goals, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Panic Disorder, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review