Cited by 1,000Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesMemory Processes and InfluencesOnline and Blended Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning.

Mayer, Richard E., Anderson, Richard B.·1992·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

In 2 experiments, students studied an animation depicting the operation of a bicycle tire pump or an automobile braking system, along with concurrent oral narration of the steps in the process (concurrent group), successive presentation of animation and narration (by 4 different methods), animation alone, narration alone, or no instruction (control group). On retention tests, the control group performed more poorly than each of the other groups, which did not differ from one another. On problem-solving tests, the concurrent group performed better than each of the other groups, which did not differ from one another. These results are consistent with a dual-coding model in which retention requires the construction of representational connections and problem solving requires the construction of representational and referential connections. An instructional implication is that pictures and words are most effective when they occur contig-uously in time or space. Imagine an electronic encyclopedia in which a user sits in front of a screen and keyboard. The user simply types in a term (or selects it from a list), such as pump. Then a multi-media presentation begins, involving stereo sound and high-resolution color graphics, with which the user interacts. In this context, words are presented orally and animations are presented visually. The technology for implementing this scenario exists today

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.444

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1992-12
Volume
84
Issue
4
Pages
444-452
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2126797747
Cited by
1,000
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 45
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
educational animation, multimedia learning, dual coding theory, retention, problem solving, successive presentation, vehicle braking systems, online encyclopedias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review