Cited by 118Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

When rewards reflect competence: A qualification of the overjustification effect.

Rosenfield, David, Folger, Robert, Adelman, Harold F.·1980·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.368

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenfield, D., Folger, R., & Adelman, H. F.
Affiliations
Southern Methodist University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1980-09
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
368-376
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2086974944
Cited by
118
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
54.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
overjustification effect, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic rewards, competence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review